Psychology Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

References for ‘keeping goals private’ (2)
K & L
W & C

A

Kyllo & Landers 1995
Ward & Carnes 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

References for visual imagery question (4)
H, J, G
W, H
O, P
C, W

A

Hardy, Jones & Gould 1996
White & Hardy 1998, p389
Orlick & Partington 1988
Callow and Waters 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

References for which came first cohesion or performance (3)
C B W
C C W
C

A

Carron, Brawley & Widmeyer (1988, p.213)
Carron, Coleman and Wheeler (2002)
Carron, 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

References for togetherness question
C B W
W D

A

Carron, Brawley & Widmeyer (1988, p.213)
Widmeyer & Ducharme 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

References for transformational leader (5)
N
B
R C
C
S

A

Northouse (2001, p3)
Beauchamp (2014)
Robbins and Coutler (2007)
Charbonneau et al (2001)
Smith et al (2013)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

References for multidimensional model of leadership
C

A

Chelladurai (1990, 1993)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

References for ‘keeping goals private’ (2)

A

Kyllo & Landers 1995
Ward & Carnes 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

References for visual imagery question (4)

A

Hardy, Jones & Gould 1996
White & Hardy 1998, p389
Orlick & Partington 1988
Callow and Waters 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

References for which came first cohesion or performance (3)

A

Carron, Brawley & Widmeyer (1988, p.213)
Carron, Coleman and Wheeler (2002)
Carron, 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

References for togetherness question (2)

A

Carron, Brawley & Widmeyer (1988, p.213)
Widmeyer & Ducharme 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

References for transformational leader (5)

A

Northouse (2001, p3)
Beauchamp (2014)
Robbins and Coutler (2007)
Charbonneau et al (2001)
Smith et al (2013)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

References for multidimensional model of leadership

A

Chelladurai (1990, 1993)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

References for ‘keeping goals private’

A

Kyllo & Landers 1995
Ward & Carnes 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

References for visual imagery question

A

Hardy, Jones & Gould 1996
White & Hardy 1998, p389
Orlick & Partington 1988
Callow and Waters 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

References for which came first cohesion or performance

A

Carron, Brawley & Widmeyer (1988, p.213)
Carron, Coleman and Wheeler (2002)
Carron, 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

References for togetherness question

A

Carron, Brawley & Widmeyer (1988, p.213)
Widmeyer & Ducharme 2008

17
Q

References for transformational leader

A

Northouse (2001, p3)
Beauchamp (2014)
Robbins and Coutler (2007)
Charbonneau et al (2001)
Smith et al (2013)

18
Q

Kyllo & Landers 1995

A

Co-operative: effect size 0.62, participant set 0.49, assigned 0.3
Private goals: 0.06, public: 0.79

19
Q

Ward & Carnes 2002

A

Self-set and public posting of goals in 5 college line-breakers, rapidly improved practice and competitive performance from 70% baseline to 95% post intervention

20
Q

Hardy, Jones & Gould 1996

A

Imagery is a symbolic experience occurring in any sensory mode

21
Q

White & Hardy 1998 p.389

A

Imagery mimics real experiences

22
Q

Orlick & Partington 1988

A

99% of 235 athletes report vivid use of imagery

23
Q

Callow and Waters (2005)

A

High kinesthetic and internal imagery could be a flat-race horse jockey rider

24
Q

Carron, Brawley & Widmeyer (1988, p.213)

A

Group cohesion is a dynamic process of a group sticking together and remain united in pursuit of agreed objectives

25
Carron Coleman Wheeler (2002)
Met-analysis of 46 studies of 9988 athletes and 1044 teams Large effect size of 164 (large relationship between cohesion and sport). No sig difference between direction of relationship or cohesion type by direction (photo) Work together, in a cycle
26
Carron 1988
Counter act social loafing Importance of individual contribution, increases accountability.
27
Widmeyer & Ducharme 2008
Research suggests that goal setting is important in improving team cohesion and team effectiveness
28
Northouse 2001, p.3
Leadership is an individual who influences a group of individual to achieve a common goal
29
Beauchamp (2014)
Transformational leaders go above and beyond to inspire, encourage and stimulate others
30
Robbins and Coutler (2007)
transformational leaders help to achieve extraordinary outcomes
31
Charbonneau et al 2001
Transformational leadership affects intrinsic motivation and therefore sports performance
32
Smith et al (2013)
Transformational leadership affects intra-team communication and therefore group cohesion.
33
PLAN: Critically discuss the multidimensional model of leadership.
Chelladurai's model (1990, 1993) Antecedents: * Situational characteristics: Opposition, weather etc * Leader: Gender, experience, personality * Member: Ability, age, mental toughness Leader behaviour: * Required: What is required by the leader in the situation * Actual: What leader actually does * Preferred: Behaviour that followers would like to see in the leader Consequences: * Performance and satisfaction +ves: * Flexible and adaptive as it recognises different situations * Focus on group satisfaction and performance (productivity) * Promotes self-reflection for leaders (allows for adjustment of leadership style) -ves: * Complexity due to multiple variables * Assumes leaders are capable of identifying the right behaviour * Time intensive * Initial model didn’t show a link between member and required behaviour showing that it was only the preferred behaviour of the members that leaders could use.
34
Antecedants
Situational characteristics: Opposition, weather etc * Leader: Gender, experience, personality * Member: Ability, age, mental toughness
35
Leader behaviour
Required: What is required by the leader in the situation * Actual: What leader actually does * Preferred: Behaviour that followers would like to see in the leader
36
Consequences
* Performance and satisfaction
37
Positives
Flexible and adaptive as it recognises different situations * Focus on group satisfaction and performance (productivity) * Promotes self-reflection for leaders (allows for adjustment of leadership style)
38
Negatives
* Complexity due to multiple variables * Assumes leaders are capable of identifying the right behaviour * Time intensive * Initial model didn’t show a link between member and required behaviour showing that it was only the preferred behaviour of the members that leaders could use.