Psychology and Physiology Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

: both variables move together in the same direction

A

Positive Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

one variable increases while another decreases

A

Negative Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Correlational research says…

A

CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION!!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Burn out survey name is…

A

the Maslach Burnout Study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Experimental research

A

-Allows us to look at causal relationships
Manipulation of a variable
Independent variable: the causing variable that is manipulated by the experimenter
Dependent variable: the variable that is expected to be influenced by the experimental manipulation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Study on how humans respond to authority

A

Milgram Shock Study 1963- told them that the experiment was to improve memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is social psychology?

A

Expanded in the 1950s to become a scientific discipline
Energized by researchers who wanted to understand behaviors seen in World War II
Obedience
Conformity
Began to study aggression in the late 1960’s and early 1970s
Started to study group behavior

The study of the dynamic relationship between individuals and people around them.

Believe that human behavior is determined by a person’s characteristics and the social situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Milgram Study Conclusion

A

Related to higher levels of obedience
Authoritarianism – tendency to prefer things to be simple rather than complex and to hold traditional values
Conscientiousness – tendency to be responsible, orderly and dependable
Agreeableness – tendency to be good natured, cooperative and trusting
Related to higher levels of resistance
Moral reasoning – the manner in which one makes ethical judgements
Social intelligence – ability to develop a clear perception of the situation using situational cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Objective was to learn if prison guard brutality was due to sadistic personalities or the guards or the prison environment

A

Stanford Prison Study 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A behavior that is intended to harm another individual who does not wish to be harmed.

A

Aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

aggression that has extreme physical harm, such as injury or death as it’s goal.

A

Violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

aggression that occurs with only a small amount of forethought or intent and that is determined primarily by impulsive emotions.

A

Emotional or Impulsive aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

aggression that is intentional and planned

A

Instrumental or cognitive aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

aggression that involves harming others physically

A

Physical aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

aggression that does not cause physical harm

A

Nonphysical aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

yelling, screaming, swearing, name calling

A

Verbal aggression

17
Q

intentionally harming another person’s social relationships.

A

Relational or social aggression

18
Q

aggression inflicted through the use of computers, cell phones, or other electronic devices

A

Cyberbullying

19
Q

Causes of Aggression

A

Biological
Hormones
Alcohol
Negative Emotions

20
Q

Pre frontal cortex:
center for control of aggression
When more highly activated - able to control impulses and aggression
Cerebral Cortex less active in
Murderers
Death row inmates

21
Q

Testosterone
Associated with increased aggression in animals and humans
Also influential in women
correlational

22
Q

Increases aggression
Involved in the majority of violent crimes
Disrupts executive function
Reduces the ability to inhibit aggression

23
Q

More likely to aggress when experiencing negative emotions

A

Negative Emotions

24
Q

-objective was to learn if prison guard brutality was due to sadistic personalities or the guards or the prison environment

A

Stanford Prison Study 1971

25
Modeling/Observational Learning
Albert BANDURA, December 4, 1925
26
Harlow and his Monkeys studied...
the Attachment Theory John BOLBY studied further.... -studied effects of separation between parents and infants -behaviors infants engage in to avoid separation from their parents and to reconnect are evolutionary mechanisms
27
Attachment Theory Styles
Secure Anxious-Resistant Avoidant Disorganized
28
Adult Attachment Theory Styles
Secure Dismissive-Avoidant Anxious- Pre-occupied Fearful-Avoidant
29
Secure Attachment Style
Infants showed distress upon separation but sought comfort and were easily comforted when parents returned
30
Anxious-Resistant Attachment Style
Smaller portion of infants experienced greater levels of distress and upon reuniting appeared to seek comfort and attempt to “punish” parents for leaving
31
Avoidant Attachment Style
Infants showed no stress or minimal stress when the parents left and either ignored the parents upon reuniting or actively avoided the parents.
32
Disorganized Attachment Style
Added later after further research These children usually fail to develop an organized strategy for coping with separation distress and tend to display aggression, disruptive behaviors, and social isolation. They are more likely to see others as threats than sources of support and may switch between social withdrawal and defensively aggressive behavior.
33
These adults are more likely to be satisfied with their relationships, feeling secure and connected to their partners without feeling the need to be together all the time. Their relationships are more likely to feature honesty, support, independence and deep emotional connections.
Adult Secure Attachment Style
34
People with this attachment style generally keep their distance from others. They may feel they do not need human connection to survive or thrive and insist on maintaining their independence and isolation from others. These individuals are often able to “shut down” emotionally when a potentially hurtful scenario arises, such as a serous argument with a partner or a threat to the continuance of their relationship.
Adult Dismissive-Avoidant Attachment Style
35
Those who form less secure bonds with their partners may feel desperate for love and affection or feel that their partner must “complete” them or fix their problems. While they long for safety and security in their romantic relationships, they may also be acting in ways that push their partner away rather than invite them in. The behavioral manifestations of their fears can include being clingy, demanding, jealous, or easily upset by small issues.
Anxious- Pre-occupied Attachment Style
36
Manifests as ambivalence instead of isolation. These individuals generally try to avoid their feelings because it is easy to get overwhelmed by them. They may suffer from unpredictable or abrupt mood swings and fear of getting hurt by their romantic partner. They are simultaneously drawn to a partner or potential partner and fearful of getting close. This style makes it hard to form and maintain meaningful, healthy relationships with others.
Fearful-Avoidant Attachment Style