Psychopathology Flashcards
(82 cards)
State 4 definitions of abnormality
- deviation from social norms
- statistical infrequency
-failure to function adequately - deviation from ideal mental health
Define social norms, name 2 types
- norms that are created by society- they are acceptable standards of behaviour set by a social group
- the people who live in this group adhere to and follow these social norms and anyone who doesn’t, who deviates from the social norms, is seen as abnormal
- social norms will vary across cultures, situations, ages uneven gender- So what is acceptable in one of these situations will not be in others. One important consideration is the degree to which a social norm is deviated from and how important society sees that norm as being
- explicit and implicit
Implicit vs explicit social norms
- an explicit social norm is one that is a written rule or law, for example that we do not use our mobile phones when driving. With reference to abnormality somebody who is depressed or agoraphobic may not to leave the house and therefore not attend school- goes against the written rule in UK society that’s all children under the age of 18 should be attending full time education
- an implicit social norm is not a written rule, but one that we tend to follow such as eating dinner with cutlery. With reference to abnormality somebody who is suffering from OCD may perform compulsive behaviour such as having to turn a light switch on and off a high number of times. Goes against the social norm of just turning a light switch off once.
Strengths of deviating from social norms
Practical applications:
- can be used to identify people who need psychiatric help. For example, the behaviour of someone who hears voices differs from the norm, so they would be likely to be diagnosed as schizophrenic, and to receive treatment.
- the key defining characteristics of anti social personality disorder is the failure to conform to culturally acceptable ethical behaviour such as recklessness, aggression, violating the rights of others and deceit fullness- these signs of the disorder are all deviation from social norms
- this is a strength as it shows how the definition can be used to help improve someone’s quality of life- has value in psychiatry
Weaknesses of deviating from social norms
Social norms vary between cultures:
- social norms change between cultures and overtime- consequently, peoples definition of abnormality will not be constant
- for example, homosexuality was regarded as a mental illness until 1973, but not anymore. Cross cultural misunderstandings are common, and may contribute- for example there is a high diagnosis rate of schizophrenia among non-white British people
- hearing voices is normal in some cultures as messages from ancestors, but would be seen as abnormal using UK standards
- weakness as it can’t lead to a universal definition across all cultures and times
Context dependent:
- classification of abnormality is based on the context in which the behaviour occurs
- for example some behaviour might be normal or abnormal in different contacts like undressing in a bathroom or a classroom, or aggressive and deceitful behaviour in the context of family life is more socially unacceptable than in the context of corporate deal-making
- weakness as it means a level of subjective judgement is required- can’t be objective measure of abnormality
Ethical/human rights concerns:
- the definition raises ethical concerns as people who don’t fit into society’s norms are often labelled as abnormal, and may even be institutionalised. For example, young unmarried mothers in the past were often locked up in mental institutions because their behaviour was seen as unacceptable.
- historically this has been the case where diagnosis like nymphomania (womans uncontrollable or excessive sexual desire) have been used to control women, or diagnosis like drapetomania (black slaves running away) where a way to control slaves and avoid debate
- suggests but the definition is linked to issues of social control
Describe failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality, and give two examples
- an individual who is failing to function adequately and unable to continue with their normal everyday activities, such as going to work, washing, or taking part in social activities, would be considered abnormal using this definition
- day to day living is difficult for these people, they may feel as if they cannot go to the shops or to a friends birthday- failing to function adequately is a general sign of having a mental illness and is not specific to a disorder
- agoraphobia- may stop someone from having social interactions normally, may struggle to find a job, may struggle going to the shops, may find it hard to maintain relationships
- depression- may find it hard to get out of bed, have personal hygiene, exercise, socialise etc
- e.g. intellectual disability disorder- would have a statistical infrequency of a very low IQ, however they must also be failing to function adequately before a diagnosis would be given
Who proposed features of failing to function adequately
Rosenhan and Seligman (1989)
Name and explain the features of failing to function adequately that Rosenhan and Seligman proposed
Observer discomfort:
- when a person’s behaviour causes distress and discomfort - for example OCD- having repeated behaviours may distress others
unpredictability:
- we rely on behaviour around us to be predictable, so if a persons behaviour seems unpredictable and uncontrolled it suggests there is something wrong
- e.g. OCD- someone may repeat things or take a long time in certain places in an unpredictable nature
Irrationality:
- we can usually interprets the behaviour of others as being rational, but if the behaviour does not seem to be rational and hard to understand it’s can suggest there is a problem
- e.g, OCD- repeatedly getting compulsions to wash things that are clean, or checking locks that are shut
Maladaptiveness:
- behaviour which is not helpful or adaptive, limits the ability of a person to adjust to a particular situation
- e.g. depression- sleeping too much or staying in bed may stop you from daily tasks
Personal suffering and distress:
- when the inability to cope with everyday life causes personal distress and suffering to the individual themselves
- e.g. depression - suicidal thoughts/ideations
Strengths of failing to function adequately as a definition of abnormality
Takes individual experiences into account:
- this is because we view the disorder from the point of view of the person experiencing it
- this definition has sensitivity as it considers the subjective experience
- this supports the failure to function adequately as if other people are solely responsible for deciding whether someone is abnormal this can be interpreted subjectively depending on the person who is deciding
- therefore the individual may not feel as though they are suffering from a mental illness when someone else says they do- less likely to happen with the failure to function adequately definition
COUNTER- SUBJECTIVE:
- someone has to judge if the patient is distressed or distressing others
- some may say they are distressed but may be judged as not suffering
- there are methods for making judgments such as the global assessment of functioning scale, however the psychiatrist has the right to make a judgement
Easy to judge:
- easy to judge who is considered abnormal according to this definition
- e.g. The DSM V uses the wells health organisation disability assessment schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0) which is a patient self report assessment tool that evaluates the patients ability to perform activities in six domains of functioning over the previous 30 days- each item is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 and the individual is given an overall score out of 180, this school represents global disability- the areas are understanding and communicating, getting around (mobility), South care, getting along with people, life activities and participation in society
- this supports failure to function adequately as if we have an objective judgement of abnormality, we are more likely to have a reliable diagnosis of abnormality
Practical application:
- can be used to identify people who need psychiatric help.
- for example, if someone could not get up for work, or feed themselves, they would be diagnosed as depressive using this definition and would get treatment
- can help improve peoples quality of life
Represents a threshold for help:
- one strength of the failure to function criterion is that it’s represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help.
- most of us have symptoms of mental disorder to some degree at some time- according to the UK mental health charity mind, around 25% of people in the UK will experience a mental health problem in any given year
- however, many people press on in the face of fairly severe symptoms- tends to be at the points that we cease to function adequately that people seek professional help or unnoticed under refers to help by others
- this criterion means that treatment on services can be targeted to those who need them the most
Weaknesses of failing to function adequately as a definition of abnormality
Relative to culture:
- definition is culture specific
- ideas on adequate functioning are related to a cultures idea of how life should be led- if these ideas are used to judge a person from another culture or subculture, problems arise
- Escobar (2012)- has pointed out that white psychiatrists may tend to over interpret the symptoms of black people during diagnosis- such factors as cultural differences in language and mannerisms
- weakness as limited definition as can’t lead to universal definition of abnormality applicable to all cultures
Behaviours can be normal but maladaptive/ threatening to ones self:
- for example adrenaline sports, smoking, drinking alcohol and skipping classes
- shows the factors can’t offer a complete definition of abnormality
Not reliable definition:
- Star Wars the definition isn’t reliable as not all abnormal or disorders people will feel personal distress
- for example, people with anti social personality disorder/ psychopaths do not feel guilt and therefore can harm or kill others without it causing them distress as in the case of Harold Shipman
- suggests that the definition can’t be generalised to all areas of abnormality
Discrimination and social control:
- it is easy to label non standard lifestyle choices as abnormal
- in practise it can be very hard to say when someone is really failing to function and when they have simply chosen to deviate from social norms- for example not having a job or permanent address might seem like failing to function, and for some people it would be. However, people with alternative lifestyles choose to live off grades. Simply those who favour high risk leisure activities or unusual spiritual practises could be classed, unreasonably, as irrational and perhaps a danger to self
- means that people who make unusual choices are at risk of being labelled abnormal and their freedom of choice may be restricted
failure to function may not be abnormal:
- there are some circumstances in which most of us failed to cope for a time for example bereavements
- it may be unfair to give someone a label that may cause them future problems just because they react to difficult circumstances
- HOWEVER, the failure to function is no less real just because the cause is clear comma also some people need professional help to adjust to circumstances like bereavement
Describe statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality
- defines abnormality as behaviour that deviates from the average, thus the less often the behaviour occurs (statistically), the more likely it is to be abnormal. Therefore the majority of people are normal and a minority are abnormal
- the concept of normal distribution is used to decide which behaviour is statistically normal and which is statistically abnormal
- this explanation only refers to characteristics that are normally distributed, which the ‘big five’ personality characteristics are- and mental illness is thought to be extremes of these traits.
The big 5 personality characteristics: - Openness (curious, creative, open to new ideas)
- Conscientiousness (organised, achievement orientated)
- extraversion (outgoing)
- agreeableness (sensitive/ trusting)
- neuroticism (anxious/ irritable)
What measure is used in statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality,describe this, graph
- Standard deviation- a measure of dispersion which shows how far spread out the data is from the mean
- the majority of characteristics cluster around the mean and approximately 68% fall within one SD of the mean
- approximately 95% of people fall within 2 SD of the mean
- this leaves 5% of the population who fall 3 SD from the mean- it is these 5% that are considered statistically abnormal
- applying this to mental health, as long as the mean and the scores are known for any measurable characteristic you can then calculate the standard deviation. Any scored two SD or more away from the mean denotes an abnormality. All you need to be able to do is objectively measure mental health.
- The DASS (depression, anxiety and stress scale) uses a questionnaire to measure depression, anxiety and stress with a very high sore considered abnormal and in need of treatment
Strengths of statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality
Real world application:
- used in clinical practise, both as part of formal diagnosis and as a way to assess the severity of an individual symptoms
- for example a diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder requires an IQ off below 70- bottom 2%
- an example of statistical infrequency used in an assessment tool is the beck depression inventory (BDI)- a score of 30+ (top 5%) is widely interpreted as indicating severe depression
- this shows that the value of the statistical infrequency criterion is useful in diagnostic and assessment processes
gives a quantitative measure which is objective:
- there is a clear cut off point as to what is and is not abnormal
- this means that it is more likely to be reliable so that someone else administering the test would get the same results and draw the same conclusion
- this is important as defining abnormality can be a subjective process
- this is a strength as if it gives an objective measure then it means access to treatment and funding may be easier as it is seen as scientific and rigorous
not affected by culture or contacts like deviation from social norms:
- because no judgments are made by the clinician which depends on how society views behaviour
- the explanation solely relies on statistical information about how frequent the behaviour is
- strength as it reduces any stigma associated with mental illness being wrong or unacceptable, rather it is just less frequent than other behavioural traits
Weaknesses of statistical infrequency as a definition of abnormality
Unusual characteristics can be positive:
- for example IQ scores of higher than 130 are just as unusual as those lower than 70
- wouldn’t think of superintelligence as undesirable or needing treatment- it is infrequent so classed as abnormal but doesn’t need treatment
Wouldn’t think of someone with very low BDI score as abnormal
- these examples show that being unusual or at one end of a psychological spectrum does not necessarily make someone abnormal
- weakness of means it can’t be used to have a diagnosis- can form part of an assessment and diagnostic procedure but is never sufficient as the sole basis for defining abnormality
Problems of labellling:
- not everyone benefits from a label
- some may be fulfilled or happy while still being statistically infrequent- such as someone with a low IQ who isn’t distressed or is coping with their lifestyle
- being labelled as abnormal may have negative consequences and may affect self esteem- there is a social stigma attached to such labels
Not all abnormal behaviours are infrequent:
- for example depression occurs in around 10% of the population at some point during their lives
- according to this definition, these people would not be abnormal because the behaviour is not within 3SD from the average- not statistically abnormal
- weakness as if seen as normal, people may not get diagnosed or help
Describe deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality
- according to this definition we are abnormal if we do not meet the criteria for ideal mental health, thus any deviation from what is considered normal is classed as abnormal
- this definition proposes a set of characteristics of what is required to be normal- Jahoda (1958)- describe six characteristics that individuals should exhibit in order to be seen as normal- an absence of any of these characteristics indicates individuals as being abnormal
- there is some inevitable overlap between what we might school deviation from ideal mental health and what we might call failure to function adequately- for example if someone has an inability to keep a job, it could either be a failure to cope with the pressures of work or as deviation from the ideal of successfully working
Describe the characteristics that are part of deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality
- positive attitude towards oneself- having self respect and a positive self concept
- self actualization- being motivated to fulfil your full potential- experiencing personal growth and development
- autonomy- being independent, self reliant and able to make personal decisions
- resisting stress- having effective coping strategies and being able to cope with everyday anxiety provoking situations
- accurate perception of reality- perceiving the world in a non distorted fashion, with an objective and realistic view of the world
- environmental mastery- being competent in all aspects of life and able to meet the demands of any situation. Having the flexibility to adapt to changing life circumstances.
Strengths of deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality
More positive approach than other definitions:
- its focus is on the positives rather than the negatives of behaviour in terms of looking at what behaviour is ideal rather than what behaviour is abnormal
- this is a strength as it could lead to mental health being seen as less of a stigma in society- in turn may lead to people being more willing to seek help from others
Practical applications:
- ask there are six specific criteria that are deemed to make up ideal mental health, it means that if someone is deviating from one of these characteristics we know exactly what that individual needs support on in order to feel better
- supports the definition ask this allows professionals to create personal goals to work towards for patients in order to facilitate self growth and thus remove the individual of their abnormality
- COUNTER- in practise these practical applications may not be possible. This is because many of the six criteria are based on subjective concepts and are therefore difficult to measure in the way that we can measure physical health. In order to diagnose mental health we use more subjective methods such as interviews, which may not be internally valid as they rely on memory and interpretation. This is an issue because it means that it is likely to be difficult to actually decide if somebody is deviating from the criteria and therefore difficult to easily treat individuals.
Comprehensive definition:
- Jahoda’s concept of ideal mental health includes a range of criteria for distinguishing mental health from mental disorder
- in fact it covers most of the reasons why we might seek or be referred for help with mental health- this in turn means that an individual’s mental health can be discussed meaningfully with a range of professionals who might take different theoretical views- for example in medically trained psychiatrist might focus on symptoms whereas a humanistic counsellor might be more interested in self actualization
- this means that ideal mental health provides a checklist against which we can assess ourselves and discuss psychological issues with a range of professionals
Weaknesses of deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality
May be Culture bound:
- the ideal mental health criterion have elements that are not equally applicable across a range of cultures
- some of Jahodas criteria are firmly located in the context of the US and Europe generally
- in particular the concept of self actualization would probably be dismissed as self indulgent in much of the world- in non western cultures the ideal person puts others before themselves and works for the common good
- even within Europe there is quite a bit of variation in the value placed on personal independence for example it is high in Germany but low in Italy
- furthermore what defines success in our working, social and love lives is very different in different cultures
- means it is difficult to apply the concept of ideal mental health from one culture to another
Extremely high standards:
- very few of us attain all of Jahodas criteria for mental health, and probably none of us achieve all of them at the same time or keep them up for very long
- it’s can be disheartening to see an impossible set of standards to live up to
- it cannot be a true measure of abnormality because no one achieves ideal mental health- most people struggle with at least one of the criteria for ideal mental health- for example most people have negative views about themselves from time to time
- COUNTER- on the other hand having such a comprehensive set of criteria for mental health to work towards might be of practical value to someone wanting to understand and improve their mental health
What are phobias
Characterised by excessive fear and anxiety, triggered by an object, place or situation. The extent of the fear is out of proportion to any real danger presented by the phobic stimulus. The person with the phobia may go to great lengths to avoid the object of the fair and experience great distress if it is encountered. In order to be diagnosed with a phobia under the DSM5, the irrational fears and reactions must result in interference with social and work life.
Categories of phobias
- specific- Fabia of an object, such as an animal or body part, or a situation such as flying or having an injection
- social anxiety- phobia of a social situation such as public speaking or using a public toilet or transport
- agoraphobia- phobia of being outside or in a public place
What are three categories of characteristics of phobias
Behavioural, emotional, cognitive
Describe behavioural characteristics of phobias
Panic:
- a person with a phobia may panic in response to the presence of the phobic stimulus. Panic may involve a range of behaviours including crying, screaming, or running away
- children may act slightly differently, for example by freezing, clinging or having a tantrum
Avoidance:
- unless the person is making a conscious effort to face their fear they tend to go two a lot of effort to prevent coming into contact with the phobic stimulus. This can make it hard to go about daily life.
- for example, someone with a fear of public toilets may have to limit the time they spend outside the home in relation to how long they can last without a toilet- this in turn can interfere with work, education and a social life
Endurance:
- the alternative behavioural response to avoidance is endurance
- this occurs when the person chooses to remain in the presence of the phobic stimulus- for example a person with a fear of spiders- arachnophobia- might choose to remain in a room with a spider on the ceiling and keep a wary eye on it rather than leaving
Describe emotional characteristics of phobias
Anxiety:
- phobias are classed as anxiety disorders
- by definition fan they involve an emotional response of anxiety, an unpleasant state of high arousal
- this prevents a person relaxing and makes it’s very difficult to experience any positive emotion
- anxiety can be long term
Fear:
- although in everyday speech we might use terms anxiety and fear interchangeably they do have distinct meanings- fear is the immediate and extremely unpleasant response we experience when we encounter or think about a phobic stimulus- it is usually more intense but experienced for shorter periods than anxiety
Emotional response is unreasonable:
- the anxiety or fear is much greater than is normal and is disproportionate to any threat posed
Cognitive characteristics of phobias
The cognitive element is concerned with the ways in which people process information- people with phobias process information about phobic stimuli differently from other objects or situations.
Selective attention to the phobic stimulus:
- if a person can see the phobic stimulus it is hard to look away from it
- keeping our attention on something really dangerous is a good thing as it gives us the best chance of reacting quickly to a threat, but this is less useful when the fear is irrational- may find it hard to concentrate on other things
Irrational beliefs:
- a person with a phobia may hold unfounded thoughts in relation to phobic stimuli- they can’t easily be explained and don’t have any basis in reality
- maybe less able to listen to us experts for example someone with a fair of having a heart attack may not listen to their doctor telling them their heart is normal
- disproportionate associations between stimuli, symptoms, or past history- for example a fear of a panic attack happening again after it’s happening once
Cognitive distortions:
- the perceptions of a person with a phobia may be inaccurate and unrealistic- for example an ophidiophobic may see snakes as alien and aggressive looking