Psychopathology Flashcards
(138 cards)
How might people define ‘Being Normal’
Acting in a way that society defines as acceptable and natural (socially acceptable manner)
Fits in with with society’s expectations
Seen as being desirable
How might people define ‘Abnormality’
Goes gassing societal norms and expectations
Quite rare/less frequently seen
Generally considered as undesirable
Statistical Infrequency
One way to define anything as ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’ is to consider and count how often we see it
Any behaviour that is relatively com on is seen as normal
Any behaviour that is rare is seen as abnormal
E.G: - schizophrenia has a 1% prevalence rate
- bipolar disorder has 2.8% prevalence rate
- bpd has a 0.1-2% prevalence rate
- 5% of people have an IQ either under 70 and more than 130
These are all rare and therefore seen as abnormal
Statistical Infrequency Strength
One strength of this definition is that is has real world application
For example, it is used in clinical practise to help assess and diagnose individuals
Fern example, in order to be diagnosed with an intellectual disability you need to be in the bottom 2% of IQ scores (an IQ below 70)
Or to be considered to have severe depression you would need to have a score in the top 5% on the Beck Depression Inventory (a score 30 or above)
This is a strength because ‘abnormal’ diagnosis can benefit individuals because they can then access relevant support services or therapies
Statical Infrequency Limitations
One limitation is that a rare characteristic can also be a positive and seen as desirable
For example, according to this definition, people with a high IQ (which is seen as desirable) are labelled as ‘abnormal’
This is a limitation because ‘abnormal’ implies undesirability and a high IQ is actually desirable
Another limitation is that mental illness is not that rare, but mental illness is considered as abnormal. 1 in 4 people will experience a mental health problem of some kind each year in England, which isn’t rare
Deviation from Social Norms
Most of us notice when people behave in a way that deviates from social norms
- i.e. behave in a way that goes against what a group considers to be socially acceptable ways of acting
These social norms are specific to the culture we live in (both across time and culture)
Any characteristic that deviates from the social norm in which the person lives is seen as abnormal
Behaviours that would deviate from British 21st century social norms and therefore considered abnormal according to this definition
Social norms (explicit laws):
Don’t murder
Don’t steal ext
Implicit (implied):
Showing respect
Behaving appropriately for the occasion (e.g. don’t wear swim wear to college)
Mental Disorder Considered as Deviation
One example of a behaviour that would be considered abnormal under this definition is antisocial personality disorder (psychopathy)
Personality traits of this include:
- manipulativeness
- deceitfulness
- callousness
- hostility
Deviation from Social Norms Strengths
This definition takes into account whether the behaviour shown is desirable or not
For example, people with high IQs do not end up as being labelled abnormal according to this definition as they are not breaking social norms with their intelligence
This is a strength because is it a better definition than statical infrequency because bit takes into account the desirability of the behaviour.
This increases the validity of the definition as it makes it more accurate
Deviation from Social Norms Limitations
Social norms, values, attitudes and morals change over time and consequently so do ideas about what is normal and abnormal
For example, ideas about homosexuality gave changed over the years. In the past in Britain, it was illegal to be gay. People who were gay were considered to deviate from social norms and therefore as abnormal and suffering from mental illness. It wasn’t until 1973 that
homosexuality was removed as a mental illness. However now it is considered very normal.
This is a limitation as it means we never have a definite understanding of abnormality. It makes this definition lack reliability and consistency.
However it can also be seen as strength because it shows that the definitions of abnormality reflect current knowledge and understanding of human behaviour
Deviation from Social Norms Strength 2
It is the case that many people who are clinically abnormal do behave in a way that breaks social norms.
For example, people who have antisocial personality disorder will steal from or hurt other people - 2 behaviours that break social norms
People with anxiety also sometimes display behaviours that would be considered abnormal, just not to the same extreme. For example they may:
- avoid eye contact
- doesn’t make conversation
- not speaking up when expected
This is a strength because it suggests the definition has validity
- i.e. it actually measures what it claims to measure (abnormality)
Deviation from Social Norms Limitation 2
This definition can lead to people who are non-conformists and/or eccentric to being labelled ‘psychologically’ abnormal
Fo example people with multitalented extreme piercings or those involved in subcultures like goths do in always differ from implicit social norms at Tim’s, but aren’t actually psychologically abnormal
This is a limitation because it shows the definition cannot always accurately identify abnormality
Failure to Function Adequately
Any characteristic or behaviour that prevents a person from coping and managing with day to day demands is seen as abnormal
Some day to day demands that this might be impacted by a failure to function adequately are:
Holding down a job
Getting an education
Basic self-care
Holding down romantic and platonic relationship
Going shopping
Getting a bus
Measuring How Well an Individual Functions
The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) is a method of measuring how well individuals function in everyday life based upon the following criteria:
1 unpredictability
2 maladaptive behaviour
3 personal distress
4 irrationality
5 observer discomfort
6 occupational dysfunction
The more of these criteria met, the less likely you are to be able to function adequately
Based off the DSM-5 criteria for depression, why might someone with depression be considered abnormal under the failure to function definition?
Someone with depression will find it hard to go to work or college due to fatigue and/or due to their reduced or diminished concentration. They will also find it hard to maintain high levels of self-care (e.g. not eating properly). They will find it difficult to hold down relationships due to feelings of worthlessness. So people with depression are likely to score high on the GAF. Their behaviour is maladaptive, it causes personal distress and it results in occupational disfunction too
Failure to Failure Adequately Strengths
The definition as validity - it is the case that the majority of people with a diagnosed mental health illness do fail to function adequately e.g. depression, schizophrenia, agoraphobia
It can be a good indication that someone might need help if they suddenly stop being able to function adequately
It does acknowledge how the person themselves feel. The GAF considers personal distress when measuring the extent to which someone is failing to function
Failure to Function Adequately Limitations
Some abnormal behaviours can actually help a person to function e.g. OCD rituals will reduce anxiety in the short term and help you cope
Not all people with a mental illness fail to function adequately e.g. some addicts can hold won a job, have a normal family, have a nice house and so on. They do appear to functioning adequately, however they are still struggling greatly
At some points in our lives, most of us will fail to function adequately e.g. at a time of bereavement
- it can become difficult to judge when someone’s grief moves from being normal grief levels to abnormal grief levels
Deviation from Ideal Mental Health
Any individual who does not meet the criteria of being ‘normal’ is seen as abnormal
Ideal mental health may look like:
- being happy
- having self-confidence
- good self esteem
- willing to give new things a go
- having good relationships with others
- having good coping strategies
Ideal Mental Health Criteria
The psychologist Maria Jahoda was one of the early pioneers to focus more on mental health than mental illness
In the 1950s, she said that ideal mental health consists of having:
- no symptoms or distress
- a positive attitude towards oneself
- the opportunity to self-actualise
- the ability to resist stress
- personal autonomy
- an accurate perception of reality
- the ability to adapt to one’s environment
Deviation from Ideal Mental Health Strength
A strength is that this definition allows for an individual who is struggling to have targeted intervention is their behaviour is not seen as ‘normal’
For example, a lack of self-esteem could be addressed to help their behaviour becoming normal. This could involve visiting a counsellor who will help them providing unconditional positive regard, warmth and empathy
This is a strength because it allows for clear goals to be set focused upon achieving ideal mental health, and, in Johoda’s opinion, achieve normality
Deviation from Ideal Mental Health Limitation
The criteria outlined by Jahoda makes ideal mental health (normality) practically impossible to achieve
For example, at times, we all struggle to adapt to change (e.g. bereavement our when we are faced with stress or with our self esteem)
This is at limitation because it means that to be ‘mentally healthy’ (i.e. normal) os very hard to achieve, so we are likely to all be diagnosed as ‘abnormal’; according to this definition
Deviation from Ideal Mental Health Limitation 2
The definition can be seen as culture-bound to western, individualistic cultures
(Individualistic ‘what is in it for me’. Non-western collectivist ‘how well my actions impact on others)
For example, the criteria of autonomy makes the collectivist cultures, where the greater good hand helping/relying on others is encouraged, seem abnormal. As most western cultures are individualistic, the criteria outlined by Jahoda seem a reasonable fit, but non-western cultures cannot relate yo the criteria she outlines
This is a limitation because it mans that this definition lacks population validity i.e. it is not true for all people
DSM-5 Categories of Phobias
Phobias are an excessive fear and anxiety triggered by an object or a situation
Separate from specific phobias, the DSM-5 recognised the categories social phobia
- phobia of a social situation such as public speaking
They also recognise agoraphobia
- phobia of being outside
Characteristics of Phobias
Regardless of the type of phobia, they are characterised by the same behavioural, environmental and cognitive responses
- i.e. how we act, feel and think in the presence of the phobic stimulus