Psychopathology Flashcards
(98 cards)
4 definitions of abnormality
- Statistical infrequency
- Deviation from social norms
- Failure to function adequately
- Deviation from ideal mental health
Statistical infrequency
Abnormality is when an individual has a less common feature than most of the population.
Uses numbers to define abnormality so it’s an objective measure.
Any individuals that fall outside the normal distribution curve (2 SD points away from the mean) are perceived as being abnormal.
A normal distribution can be drawn to show which proportions of people share the behaviour, most people fall on/near the mean.
Statistical infrequency evaluation - objective way of defining abnormality
This way of deciding who is abnormal could be argued to be objective.
This is because it is uses unbiased statistical data to establish rare behaviours within a population. Therefore, this definition of abnormality avoids the criticism of the other definitions which are based on subjective standards of what is considered normal or abnormal.
This could be considered a strength of this definition as it attempts to define abnormality in a way that is free from human bias.
Statistical infrequency evaluation - some disorders aren’t statistically rare
There are some mental health disorders identified by the diagnostic manuals for mental illness that would not fit within this definition.
For example, depression and anxiety are common mental health disorder however they would not be deemed abnormal according to this definition as they are not statistically rare.
This raises questions over how well statistical infrequency can be used to define abnormality.
Statistical infrequency evaluation - doesn’t account for behaviours that are statistically rare yet desirable
For example, individuals with a very high IQ, which is statistically infrequent, would be deemed abnormal under this definition however this is a very desirable trait therefore it is unlikely to be treated as an
‘abnormality’.
Therefore, using statistical infrequency to define abnormality means that we are unable to distinguish between desirable and undesirable behaviours.
This is problematic because we need to be able to identify infrequent and undesirable behaviours in order for the definition to be useful in helping people with mental health issues.
Deviation from social norms
Abnormal behaviour is that which goes against unwritten rules/expectations in a given society/ culture
It draws a line between desirable and undesirable behaviours and labels individuals behaving undesirably as social deviants.
This is done for both the individual and for society as a whole.
We are making a collective judgement as a society about what is right/correct behaviour.
One important consideration is the degree to which a social norm is deviated from and how important society sees that norm as being.
Norms are specific to the culture that we live in and are likely to be different for different situations and different generations, so there are very few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal.
The definition of abnormality is an example of cultural relativism.
It’s the way in which the function and meaning of a behaviour, value are relative to a specific cultural setting.
Interpretations about the same behaviour may differ between cultures.
Deviation from social norms evaluation - social norms consider age
Judging behaviours as abnormal based on social norms means that factors like age are considered.
For example, a child having a tantrum in a supermarket would no be seen as abnormal however the same undesirable behaviour would be deemed abnormal if displayed by an adult.
Therefore, the social norms definition takes into account important factors when establishing if behaviour is abnormal.
Deviation from social norms evaluation - social norms vary with time
The norms defined by a society vary over time as social attitudes change.
For example, homosexuality was deemed illegal however social norms have changed since then so it is now no longer deemed an ‘abnormal’ behaviour in our society.
Therefore, the social norms definition is limited in its ability to define abnormality because norms are constantly changing.
Deviation from social norms evaluation - social norms vary across cultures
Social norms vary within and across cultures so it is difficult to use this definition to assess abnormal behaviour.
There is no universal agreement over social norms, they are culturally specific which means that a person from one cultural group could be labelled abnormal because they are deviating from the norms of a culture different to their own.
For example, in Western societies hearing voices is a sign of a mental health disorder (schizophrenia) however in other cultures it’s common
This is a problem because using the deviation from social norms definition could lead to people being incorrectly labelled as abnormal.
Failure to function adequately
Abnormal behaviour is judged as inability to cope with everyday life.
E.g. going to work.
Behaviour is also considered abnormal when it causes distress, leading to an inability to function properly.
The definition can be used with others (statistical infrequency).
Someone with a low IQ is unlikely to be diagnosed with intellectual disability disorder (IDD). if the low IQ was a barrier to them functioning adequately, it may ne appropriate to diagnose them to access support.
RoseHan and Seligmam 1989
Suggested possible features of dysfunction.
Maladaptive behaviour : Behaviour stopping individuals from attaining life goals, both socially and occupationally.
Irrationality : Displaying behaviour that cannot be explained in a rational way
Observer discomfort: Displaying behaviour that causes discomfort to others i.e. friends, family members
Unpredictability :Displaying unexpected behaviours.
Failure to function adequately evaluation - focuses on the individual’s experience
This definition recognises the personal experience of the individual.
It acknowledges the importance of considering how the individual feels and how well they are managing to cope unlike other definitions, that simply make judgements on whether the individuals behaviour fits with society’s expectation.
This suggests that this definition is a useful tool for assessing abnormal behaviour as it allows us to view mental disorders from the perspective of the person experiencing it.
Failure to function adequately evaluation - some abnormal behaviours don’t accompany failure to function
There are some behaviours that would be considered ‘abnormal’ but do not stop the person from functioning or cause them distress.
E.g. Harold Shipman was an English doctor who murdered at least 215 patients however he was considered to be a respectable doctor and do not display any of the features of dysfunction.
This demonstrates that many people may not be identified as abnormal according to this definition because they do not suffer from any personal distress and appear to function normally.
Therefore, this definition alone is not sufficient enough to use to determine if a person’s behaviour is abnormal.
Failure to function adequately evaluation - normal abnormality
This definition does not consider situations in which a healthy, psychological response for someone may mean a period of failing to function adequately.
E.g. when a loved one dies it is normal to suffer distress and not be able to cope with everyday demands. Grieving is a natural response to overcoming loss and should not become a factor in defining that person as abnormal.
This is an issue as it means someone’s behaviour may be incorrectly identified as abnormal.
Deviation from ideal mental health :
Abnormality is that which fails to meet prescribed criteria for psychological normality/wellbeing.
It focuses on the absence of ideal mental health to judge abnormality.
Marie Jahoda (1958) suggested the six key features that define ideal mental health.
The more criteria someone fails to meet, the more abnormal they are.
Maria Jahoda 1958 PRAISE
•Positive attitude towards self: high self esteem
Resistance to stress: have effective coping strategies.
• Accurate perception of reality: individuals should have an objective and realistic view of the world.
• Independent (Autonomy): independent and self-reliant and able to make personal decisions.
• Self-actualization: ability to reach full potential .
• Environmental mastery: being competent in all aspects of life + having the flexibility to adapt to changing life circumstances.
Deviation from ideal mental health evaluation - comprehensive criteria for mental health
Unlike other definitions, the deviation from ideal mental health definition of abnormality attempts to define abnormality by looking at the person as a whole, considering a multitude of factors that can affect their mental health and well-being.
It covers a broad range of criteria such as how the person views themselves and how they cope with stressors and the demands of varying situations.
Therefore, this definition of abnormality could be praised for providing comprehensive criteria for mental health.
Deviation from ideal mental health evaluation - criteria too demanding
Most people do not meet all the criteria set out by Jahoda and as a result, under this definition, the majority of people would be classified as abnormal.
E.g. few people achieve self-actualisation and experience personal growth all the time.
The absence of these features is unlikely to indicate that someone is suffering from a mental health disorder.
Therefore, we need to question the usefulness of this definition as a way of classifying abnormal behaviour.
Deviation from ideal mental health evaluation - ethnocentric criteria
This definition reflects Western views of psychological ‘normality’.
Many of the concepts, such as autonomy and self-actualisation, may not be recognised as aspects of ideal mental health in many cultures.
E.g. collectivist cultures emphasise the importance of inter-dependence rather than autonomy.
This is problematic because it could lead to people from non-Western cultures being incorrectly labelled as ‘abnormal’.
Books used by professionals to diagnose + categorise mental disorders :
- DSM : diagnostic statistic manual.
published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA)
5th version DSM-V - ICD : international statistical classifications of diseases
published by WHO
11th version ICD-11
Phobias definition :
Extreme fear of an object/situation which is irrational to the actual danger.
It’s a type of anxiety disorder
phobias behavioural features
- panic : phobic people experience physical panic (fight or flight), which can cause shortness of breath, high heart rates
- avoidance : avoiding any situations where they may come in contact with the phobic stimulus
- endurance : remaining with the phobic stimuli yet experiencing extreme anxiety
phobias emotional features
- fear : immediate response when the phobic stimulus is encountered, showing feelings of terror
- anxiety : feelings of distress in the presence of the phobic stimulus. unpleasant state of high arousal
phobias cognitive features
- cognitive distortions : thoughts about the phobic stimulus are distorted
e.g. arachnophobia people seeing spiders bigger than they really are. - irrational thought process : phobic person doesn’t respond to te evidence
- selective attention : the phobic person will find it hard to look away from the stimulus
a person’s selective attention causes them to become fixated on the object they fear, because of their irrational beliefs about the danger period.