Psychopathology Flashcards

1
Q

What is localisation of function in the brain?

A

Localisation is the belief that certain areas of the brain are responsible for specific processes and behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the motor area?

A
  • found in both frontal lobes - regulates and coordinates movements.
  • damage to the motor cortex causes the sufferer to lose muscle function/paralysis on the opposite side of the impairment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the auditory area?

A
  • in the temporal lobe
  • responsible for processing auditory information and speech.
  • Damage results in hearing loss.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the visual area?

A
  • in the occipital lobe
  • responsible for processing visual information by sending information from right visual field to left and vice versa.
  • Damage to left hemisphere results in blindness to both right visual fields of the eyes (damage to opposite hemispheres).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the somatosensory area?

A
  • in the parietal lobe

- processes sensory information eg. touch, heat, pressure and limb position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Wernicke’s area?

A

Wernicke found patients with no problem producing language but couldn’t understand it.

  • speech produced was fluent but meaningless.
  • because of damage to ‘Wernicke’s area’
  • in the left temporal lobe
  • responsible for language comprehension/understanding.
  • Damage results in Wernicke’s aphasia, characterised by nonsensical words ‘neologisms’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Broca’s area?

A
  • in the left frontal lobe responsible for the production of speech.
  • Damage causes Broca’s aphasia, characterised by speech problems affecting sentence formation but not understanding.
  • they can only talk in short meaningful sentences which lack fluency
  • have difficulty with certain words helping sentence function (e.g. ‘it’ and ‘the’).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EVALUATION of localisation of function?

A

Gender Bias - Broca and Wernicke only studied male patients.
There is evidence to suggest that that women may have larger language centres, thus, a larger use of language.

Communication between areas - communication between areas of the brain is more important than localisation of function. Evidence suggests that complex behaviour like language and movement involve a stimulus traveling through several brain regions before a response is made. This is a weakness because it means that the theory is an oversimplification, failing to mention the importance of communication between brain regions.

Broca’s area - Dronkers re-examined Broca’s patients with MRI scans and found that they also had damage to the surrounding areas, which may also be involved in speech production.

Wider Application - Localisation of function has positive real-life applications to understand brain damage in stroke sufferers. The loss of particular functions indicates where the stroke occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Hemispheric Lateralisation?

A
  • idea that each hemisphere is functionally different.
  • hemispheres control the opposite side of the body.
  • left side is dominant for language production and comprehension, and right side for visuospatial tasks.
  • contradicts holistic theory suggesting brain functions are global using whole brain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Consequences of damage to the motor area?

A
  • sufferer loses muscle function/paralysis on the opposite side of the impairment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consequences of damage to the auditory area?

A

hearing loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Consequences of damage to the visual area?

A

Damage to opposite hemisphere results in blindness to both opposite visual fields on both eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What surrounds brain hemispheres?

A

-covered by a cortex of ‘grey matter’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outline Split-Brain Research into Hemispheric Lateralisation.

A

A: Sperry aimed to demonstrate that hemispheres have different functions/abilities

  • natural experiment investigating hemispheric lateralisation
  • 11 male split-brain patients who had their corpus callosum cut, separating the two hemispheres.

P: pps had one eye covered and stared at a point on a screen

  1. In the describe task an image/word was presented to the patient’s left visual field for 1/10th of a second (processed by right hemisphere) or right visual field (processed by left hemisphere).
    - pp had to say what they saw.
    - corpus callosum relays information between hemispheres giving a complete picture.
    - in split-brain patients, information isn’t relayed.

F: If the stimulus was exposed to right visual field, they could say the word

  • because it was processed by opposite (L) hemisphere, containing ‘language centres’, allowing speech.
  • if stimulus was exposed to the Left visual field, patient couldn’t say the word
  • because it was processed by opposite (R) hemisphere with no language centres.
  1. In the tactile test, an object was placed in the patient’s left or right hand behind a screen. They selected a matching object from behind the screen either verbally or visually (by touch).

F: In the right hand, pps could describe the object in speech and writing
In left hand, pps unaware of the object and couldn’t verbally identify it. However, they could point/select the object visually and by touch
- Because left hemisphere produces language
- Right hemisphere cannot produce language so although it can identify stimuli, it can’t verbalise this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conclusions of Sperry’s research?

A

The findings of Sperry’s research highlights key differences between the two hemispheres.
Left hemisphere is dominant in speech and language
Right hemisphere is dominant in visual-motor tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline the 2 conditions of Sperry’s research.

A

Describe task: image/word was presented to the patient’s left visual field for 1/10th of a second (processed by right hemisphere) or right visual field (processed by left hemisphere). The pp had to say what they saw.

In a normal brain, the corpus callosum relays information between hemispheres giving a complete picture. However, in split-brain patients, information isn’t relayed.

Tactile test: object placed in the patient’s left or right hand behind a screen. They selected a matching object behind the screen either verbally or visually (by touch).

17
Q

Describe the findings of Sperry’s split-brain research for:

- the describe task

A
  • image/word was presented to the patient’s left visual field for 1/10th of a second (processed by right hemisphere) or right visual field (processed by left hemisphere). The pp had to say what they saw.
  • In a normal brain, corpus callosum relays information between hemispheres giving a complete picture.
  • in split-brain patients, information isn’t relayed.

F: If the stimulus was exposed to right visual field, they could say the word

  • because it was processed by the left hemisphere, containing the ‘language centres’, allowing speech.
  • However, if exposed to the left visual field the patient couldn’t say the word because it was processed by the right hemisphere which contains no language centres.
18
Q

Describe the findings of Sperry’s split-brain research for:

- the tactile task

A
  • object was placed in the patient’s left or right hand behind a screen. They selected a matching object from behind the screen either verbally or visually (by touch).

F: In the right hand, pps could describe the object in speech and writing

  • In left hand, pps unaware of the object and couldn’t verbally identify it.
  • they could point/select the object visually and by touch
  • Because only left hemisphere produces language
  • Right hemisphere cannot produce language so although it can identify stimuli, it can’t verbalise this
19
Q

Positives of Sperry’s split-brain research?

A
  • Clearly demonstrates lateralisation, opposing holistic theory of whole brain being involved in tasks.
  • left hemisphere dominant for language tasks and right for visuo-spatial tasks.
  • suggests left hemisphere is the analyser and right is the synthesiser- with individual and specific functions.
  • standardised procedures (1/10th of a second to look at pictures) Thus, high control enables the procedure to be regarded as replicable to assess reliability.
20
Q

Negatives of Sperry’s split-brain research?

A
  • Findings cannot be be generalised to NORMAL brains as sample size of only 11 pps with epilepsy is not representative of the rest of the population and may only reflect epileptic brains.
  • Lack of control over extraneous variables as some patients had more disconnection of hemispheres as part of the surgical procedure than others. This may have affected the degree that information was relayed between hemispheres.
  • Furthermore, some patients received drug therapy for longer than others, affecting their ability to recognise objects due to biological neuronal changes.
  • These confounding variables were not controlled, meaning that lateralised functions may be unreliable as causal conclusions were drawn.
  • data was artificially produced as the mundane task of identifying objects is unreflective of the everyday and, in real life, a severed callosum can be compensated for by the use of two eyes (not covered).
  • Gender-biased all-male sample may not demonstrate differences between the sexes, so we cannot generalize results to women who may have eg. larger visual fields.
21
Q

Discuss how hemispheric lateralisation/language centres have helped us understand the brain.

A
  • systematic research from Wernicke and Broca demonstrated that language centres are lateralised to the left hemisphere
  • Wernicke’s area is responsible for the interpretation of speech and Broca’s for the production of speech
  • Damage leads to Wernicke’s + Broca’s aphasia, characterised by inability to understand or produce speech
  • As language centres are lateralised, they are not impaired by damage to the right hemisphere.
  • The left hemisphere controls muscles on the right side of the body
  • thus, damage to the left hemisphere causes impaired language and right-sided paralysis of body muscles
22
Q

What is plasticity?

A

Plasticity is the brain’s ability to physically and functionally adapt and change through a person’s life

  • as a result of new learning, experiences and trauma.
  • creates new neural pathways and alters existing ones.
  • frequently used connections are strengthened
  • rarely-used connections are removed in a process called synaptic pruning to increase the efficiency of neuronal transmissions.
23
Q

Research support for brain plasticity?

A

Maguire’s study of the brains of London taxi drivers:

  • MRI scans found a larger volume of grey matter in the hippocampi of their brains than control group
  • and positive correlation between increasing grey matter volume and the longer the individuals had been taxi drivers.
  • Researchers concluded that grey matter in the hippocampus facilitates navigation because it is associated with spatial awareness; an ability which taxi drivers must have when they complete The Knowledge test.
  • shows that the structure of the brain can be altered by plasticity due to increased demands for specific skills.
24
Q

What is functional recovery?

A
  • A form of plasticity that occurs after trauma, where the brain transfers functions of damaged areas to healthy parts of the brain
  • adapting to compensate for damage quickly after trauma in spontaneous recovery to allow normal functioning.
25
Q

Outline functional recovery in the brain.

A
  • brain rewires itself by forming new synaptic connections between damaged and healthy areas near the trauma.
  • Secondary neural pathways near the area are activated and unmasked to attempt to recover the lost function
  • New neural pathways are formed through axonal sprouting (growing new nerve endings)
  • Re-formation of blood vessels serving the brain.
  • Recruitment of homologous (similar) areas on the opposite side of the brain to perform specific tasks
26
Q

Evaluate plasticity.

A

+ PRACTICAL APPLICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEUROREHABILITATION following injury to the brain. When spontaneous recovery slows over time, physical therapy is needed to maintain improvements in functioning. Electrical stimulation of the brain or movement therapy are employed to help people regain as much function as possible.

+ COGNITIVE RESERVE MAY INCREASE THE RATE OF FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY = Schneider found that the ability of people to adapt to brain injury with a disability-free recovery (DFR) was positively correlated with the time spent in education (cognitive reserve). Recovery of brain-damaged patients found 40% had a disability-free recovery with 16 years or more of education while only 10% of those in education for less than 12 years recovered.
This suggests that individuals who have been in education for a longer time may have developed the ability to form neuronal connections at a high rate, and therefore experience high levels of functional recovery, demonstrating POSITIVE PLASTICITY.

  • PLASTICITY HAS BEEN SHOWN TO DECREASE WITH AGE.
  • NEGATIVE PLASTICITY: The brain’s ability to rewire itself has negative consequences on behaviour.
    Plasticity is responsible for phantom limb disorder due to reorganisation in the somatosensory cortex, which has unpleasant and painful symptoms. Furthermore, prolonged drug use may also influence the development of dementia in later life due to negative synaptic connections.
  • THERE ARE LIMITS TO SPONTANEOUS AND FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY = Although after trauma the brain activates secondary neural pathways to reinstate normal function, the brain can only ‘repair’ itself up to a specific point, after which motor therapy or electrical stimulation is needed to increase recovery rates. This suggests that functional recovery alone cannot reinstate normal function.
27
Q

What is synaptic pruning?

A
  • creates new neural pathways and alters existing ones.
  • frequently used connections are strengthened
  • rarely-used connections are removed
  • to increase the efficiency of neuronal transmissions.
28
Q

What are biological rhythms?

A

Biological rhythms: are distinct changes in body processes in response to cyclical time and environmental changes.

They are controlled by internal body clocks (endogenous pacemakers of the pineal gland, and suprachiasmatic nucleus) which relate endogenous pacemakers to exogenous zeitgebers and influenced by external changes to the environment (exogenous zeitgebers)

There are 3 types of biological rhythms:
Circadian- cycles once every 24 hours - sleep-wake cycle
Infradian- cycles less than once every 24 hours -menstrual cycle
Ultradian- have cycles that occur more than once every 24 hours -stages of sleep

29
Q

What controls biological rhythms?

A

They are controlled by internal body clocks (endogenous pacemakers of the pineal gland/SCN and melatonin) which relate endogenous pacemakers to exogenous zeitgebers and influenced by external changes to the environment (exogenous zeitgebers)
THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY INTERNAL BODY CLOCKS (ENDOGENOUS PACEMAKERS) AND INFLUENCED BY EXTERNAL CUES SUCH AS LIGHT, AN EXOGENOUS ZEITGEBER.

PSYCHOLOGISTS INVESTIGATED THE EFFECT OF LEAVING INTERNAL BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS ‘FREE-RUNNING’ WITH NO EXTERNAL CUES VIA ISOLATION STUDIES

30
Q

Types of biological rhythms?

A

Circadian- cycles once every 24 hours - sleep-wake cycle
Infradian- cycles less than once every 24 hours -menstrual cycle
Ultradian- have cycles that occur more than once every 24 hours -stages of sleep

31
Q

Outline research into circadian biological rhythms.

A

Aschoff and Wever carried out a lab study on a group of students who spent 4 weeks in a WW2 bunker, deprived of exogenous cues of natural light. Found that circadian rhythms varied between 24-25 hours but some reached 29, demonstrating that circadian rhythms are dependent on endogenous pacemakers even without exogenous zeitgebers.

Michel Siffre spent 6 months in a cave without external cues of light/sound so that the only influence was his internal body clock. His sleep-wake cycle increased from 24-hours to 25-48 hours, highlighting the existence of an internal circadian clock and the important influence of exogenous zeitgebers in regulating internal body-clocks.

32
Q

Evaluate research into circadian biological rhythms.

A
  • Due to the novel setting we cannot draw causal conclusions about endogenous body-clocks because the artificial situation may have unnaturally affected the quality/quantity of pp sleep, lacking ecological validity as it is not indicative of real-life sleep behaviour
33
Q

Outline Aschoff and Wever’s research into circadian biological rhythms.

A

Aschoff and Wever carried out a lab study on a group of students who spent 4 weeks in a WW2 bunker, deprived of exogenous cues of natural light. Found that circadian rhythms varied between 24-25 hours but some reached 29, demonstrating that circadian rhythms are dependent on endogenous pacemakers even without exogenous zeitgebers.

  • Due to the novel setting we cannot draw causal conclusions about endogenous body-clocks because the artificial situation may have unnaturally affected the quality/quantity of pp sleep, lacking ecological validity as it is not indicative of real-life sleep behaviour