Psychopathology - abnormality Flashcards
(13 cards)
4 ways to define abnormality
Statistical infrequency, deviation from social norms, failure to function adequately, deviation from ideal mental health
Statistical infrequency
Falls out of the typical/average range
Limitations of statistical infrequency
Inflexible (illogical cut off points - 2.5%)
Behaviour can occur frequently (i.e depression - 25%)
Culture (cultural differences)
Characteristics can be positive (i.e IQ > 130 not considered abnormal when low scores are)
Strength of statistical infrequency
Objective (mathematical nature -> no bias)
Representative (whole picture & population)
Useful (used in clinical practice - formal diagnoses & assessing symptom severity)
Benefits vs problems (benefit from abnormal classification i.e. low IQ -> access support services)
Deviation from social norms
Violation of approved/accepted behaviour
Limitations of DFSN
Change over time (legislation changes norms i.e. homosexuality 70s was a mental illness -> weakens temporal validity)
Cultural differences (variation of behaviours across cultures -> unclear what is abnormal -> cultural relativism)
Strengths of DfSN
Helps society (adherence to norms means society is ordered & predictable)
Practical application (early identification by clinical practice can allow for earlier interventions & support -> useful)
Failure to function adequately
Unable to do everyday things & lead a normal life
Limitations of FtFA
Too focused on individual (not a problem for the individual but for people around them)
Doesn’t stop functioning (focus on how they’re coping leads to missing abnormal behaviour -> may appear fine through fitting into society but have distorted thinking)
Subjectivity (definition is not clear as different people interpret life differently, as well as there is no criteria for adequate functioning)
Strengths of FtFA
Suggests free will (focused on individual’s perspective -> deem themself as abnormal and receive help)
Operationalised (GAF scale measuring -> objective decision about behaviour)
Falsifiable (Can be seen by others -> others can intervene and help the individual)
Practical applications (people seek help when symptoms are most severe -> help in targeting treatments and services)
Deviation from ideal mental health
Absence of factors that indicate psychological well-being (Jahoda 1958)
Limitations of DfIMH
Feasibility (Jahoda’s critera makes normality impossible -> majority of population would be abnormal by this definition)
Ethnocentrism (autonomy criteria makes collectivist cultures appear abnormal, non-western cultures would also appear abnormal by the criteria -> not global)
Subjectivity (vague criteria -> difficult to measure)
Strengths of DfIMH
Positive (focuses on what is helpful & desirable for individual)
Useful (allows for clear goals to be set & focused on to achieve normality)
Comprehensive definition (provides a checklist to compare ourselves against & discuss issues with psychological professionals)