Pubic Law Autumn Flashcards
(50 cards)
What is a constitution?
- A constitution is a set of fundamental principles, rules, and conventions that establish the framework for government, distribute powers between different institutions, and define the rights of citizens.
- It regulates the relationship between the state and individuals and among the various branches of government.
What are the main types of constitutions?
- Written Constitution: A single, formal document (e.g., USA 1787) clearly setting out constitutional rules.
- Unwritten Constitution: Not found in a single document; based on statutes, conventions, judicial decisions, and authoritative works (e.g., UK).
- Rigid Constitution: Difficult to amend; requires a special process (e.g., US Constitution needs supermajorities).
- Flexible Constitution: Can be amended through ordinary legislative processes (e.g., UK Constitution).
What are the 4 main characteristics of the UK constitution?
- Unwritten: No single document — based on statutes (e.g., Human Rights Act 1998), common law, conventions (e.g., Prime Ministerial appointments), and authoritative texts (e.g., Dicey).
- Flexible: Can be changed easily by a simple Act of Parliament.
- Unitary: Sovereignty rests with the central government, though devolution has granted powers to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland (as opposed to federal like the US, where power is divided between states)
- Parliamentary Sovereignty: Parliament can make or unmake any law.
What are the advantages of a written constitution over an unwritten constitution?
- Clarity and accessibility: Citizens can easily know their rights and governmental structure.
- Entrenchment: Harder to amend, providing stability and protecting fundamental rights.
- Judicial review: Courts can strike down laws inconsistent with the constitution.
- Democratic legitimacy: A codified document can be ratified by the people, enhancing its authority.
Why is Barber against a written constitution?
Nick Barber argues that:
- A written constitution would freeze political arrangements that need to remain flexible.
- The current system’s adaptability is a strength, allowing the UK to evolve without crisis.
- Codification risks judicial overreach, transferring too much power from elected politicians to unelected judges.
- Political and social consensus necessary for a codified constitution is lacking.
Is it possible for the UK to adopt a written constitution? Is it likely in the near future?
Possible:
- Parliament could legislate for a constitutional convention or create a written constitution.
- Would require broad political and public consensus.
Unlikely in the near future due to:
- Lack of political will.
- Deep disagreement on key constitutional issues (e.g., role of monarchy, devolution).
- UK has a tradition of gradual, pragmatic change rather than revolutionary shifts.
What are some arguments in favour of the UK adopting a written constitution?
- Enhances clarity, certainty, and public understanding.
- Protects rights more robustly (e.g., entrenching Human Rights Act).
- Limits executive power; prevents ‘elective dictatorship.’
- Offers symbolic renewal after constitutional crises (e.g., Brexit, prorogation row 2019).
What are some arguments against the UK adopting a written constitution?
Current system is flexible and adaptable.
No public consensus; risks political division.
Entrenched constitution may lead to rigidity and judicial activism.
Practical difficulties of drafting and ratifying.
What are the key sources of the UK Constitution? (with examples)
Sources of the UK constitution include:
- Acts of Parliament: Parliament can create or change constitutional rules.
- Common Law (Judicial Decisions): Judges develop constitutional principles through cases.
- Constitutional Conventions: Unwritten rules based on political practice.
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): Incorporated into UK law through the Human Rights Act 1998; courts interpret legislation to comply with Convention rights where possible (s.3 HRA).
What are the 6 basic constitutional principles of the UK Constitution?
The basic constitutional principles include:
- Parliamentary Sovereignty: Parliament is the supreme legal authority.
- Rule of Law: Everyone is subject to the law, including government.
- Separation of Powers: Functions of government divided among Parliament (legislature), Government (executive), and Courts (judiciary).
- Constitutional Monarchy: Monarch acts on the advice of ministers.
- Democracy: Authority derives from the consent of the governed.
- Respect for Human Rights: Growing importance post-HRA 1998.
What are constitutional conventions? Are they enforceable in court?
- Constitutional conventions are political rules or practices regarded as binding but are not legally enforceable in court.
For example, the Prime Minister must command the confidence of the House of Commons.
- Courts recognise conventions but do not enforce them legally.
Can constitutional conventions be ‘created’?
- New conventions can emerge as political practices change.
- For example, the convention that Parliament must approve major military action (Iraq vote 2003) developed over time.
Creation Process:
- Practice must be consistently followed.
- Political actors must believe they are bound by it (obligation felt, not merely convenience).
- Example: Development of ministerial responsibility conventions in 19th and 20th centuries.
What is the importance of Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd (1976)?
- This case shows that while conventions are politically binding, the courts will only intervene to protect associated legal interests (e.g., national security, public interest).
What is A.V. Dicey’s definition of Parliamentary Sovereignty?
Dicey defines Parliamentary Sovereignty as meaning:
- Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatsoever.
- No person or body has the right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.
- Parliament is supreme in both legal theory and practice.
- Parliament cannot bind its successors.
Is Dicey’s view of Parliamentary Sovereignty correct today?
Dicey’s theory is a classic starting point, but modern constitutional practice shows some qualifications:
- Human Rights Act 1998 requires courts to interpret legislation compatibly with human rights.
- Devolution Acts (e.g., Scotland Act 1998) limit Westminster’s powers politically (not legally).
- European Union Membership (pre-Brexit) showed Parliament accepted limits on its sovereignty voluntarily (Factortame case).
- Courts in Jackson hinted that there might be fundamental limits to Parliament’s power.
What did the Bill of Rights 1688 ensure?
What is the basis of sovereignty in the UK constitution?
The Bill of Rights 1688:
- Asserted parliamentary supremacy over the monarch.
- Prevented the monarch from suspending laws or levying taxes without Parliament’s consent.
Basis of Sovereignty:
- Rooted in the Glorious Revolution settlement.
- Parliament became the primary legal authority- sovereignty is based on historical constitutional development and political practice rather than a codified constitution.
Is there a difference between acting illegally and unconstitutionally?
- Illegality: Breaching a specific law or statute — enforceable in court.
- Unconstitutionality: Breaching conventions or broader constitutional principles — not always legally enforceable.
- For example: acting without lawful authority is illegal, but ignoring ministerial conventions is unconstitutional but not necessarily illegal.
What is the enrolled bill rule?
- The enrolled bill rule is the principle that once a bill has been passed by both Houses and receives royal assent, the courts cannot question how it was passed.
- The focus is only on the existence of the Act, not on any procedural defects during its passage.
What is meant by ‘manner and form’?
- ‘Manner and form’ refers to Parliament being able to bind future Parliaments regarding how legislation is passed, rather than substantively limiting them.
- For example, Parliament might state that no future law changing voting rights can be passed unless it is approved by a two-thirds majority in the House of Commons. Future parliaments can still change the law of voting rights as long as they follow procedure.
- Parliament, however, cannot say that future parliaments are not allowed to change voting rights whatsoever.
What are the issues in R (Jackson) v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56?
Issue:
- Whether the Hunting Act 2004, passed using the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 procedures (bypassing House of Lords), was valid.
Court’s Decision:
- Parliament can change the law using modified legislative processes.
- The Parliament Acts were lawful ways of legislating.
- Some judges suggested there may be fundamental constitutional principles that even Parliament cannot override (early challenge to Dicey).
How does implied repeal operate?
Implied repeal is when a later Act of Parliament conflicts - with an earlier one, the later Act impliedly repeals the earlier Act.
- There are no special formalities needed; later legislation automatically prevails.
- Based on the idea that Parliament cannot bind its successors (A.V. Dicey’s view).
What are ‘constitutional statutes’?
How did the case study R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3 (known as the HS2 case) emphasise these?
Statutes that:
- Condition the relationship between citizen and state.
- Fundamental to the constitutional framework.
For example: Examples: Magna Carta, Bill of Rights 1688, Human Rights Act 1998, Scotland Act 1998.
The HS2 case:
- Court said certain constitutional instruments have special status and form part of the UK’s constitutional order.
- Constitutional statutes (e.g., Bill of Rights 1688) cannot be overridden casually by legislation.
- The courts may interpret statutes in ways that protect fundamental constitutional principles.
What is meant by the Crown in UK constitutional law?
- The Crown represents the legal embodiment of the State.
- It encompasses both the Monarch personally and the government acting in the Monarch’s name.
- Today, ‘the Crown’ mainly refers to executive authority, exercised by Ministers on behalf of the Monarch.
What are prerogative powers? What are some examples of these?
- Historical powers originally held by the Monarch alone. Now mostly exercised by Ministers. Exist outside statute unless overridden or replaced by legislation.
- For example, foreign affairs, war powers, issuing passports.