Public health Flashcards
(39 cards)
What are the 3 types of prevention?
- Primary: stopping disease from occurring e.g. vaccines
- Secondary: detecting a disease early e.g. screening
- Stopping disease from progressing e.g. diabetic foot care, stroke rehab
What is the preventative paradox?
A preventative measure which brings much benefit to the population often offers little to each participating individual.
I.e. it’s about screening a large number of people to help a small number of people.
What does sensitivity mean?
the proportion of people with the disease who are correctly identified by the screening test.
What does specificity mean?
the proportion of people without the disease who are correctly excluded by the screening test.
PPV vs NPV?
PPV: the proportion with a positive test result who actually have the disease.
NPV: the proportion with a negative test result who do not have the disease.
What is the wilson + jugner criteria for screening?
- The condition should be an important health problem
- Treatment should be available
- Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available
- There should be a recognisable latent or early symptomatic stage
- There should be a suitable test or examination
- The test should be acceptable to the population
- The natural history of this condition should be understood
- There should be a policy on whom to treat as patients
- Costs of screening should be economically balanced
- Screening should be a continuous project, not just one off
Lead time bias vs length time bias?
Lead time : early detection results in an apparent increase in survival time
Length time: differences in the length of time taken for a condition to progress to severe effects that may affect the apparent efficacy e.g. less aggressive cancers that slowly progress are more likely to be spotted
What are the prospective studies vs retrospective studies?
Prospective: cohort/RCT
Retrospective: Case control/cross-sectional/case series/case report
Incidence vs prevalence?
Incidence – the number of new cases of a disease that develop in a population (e.g. per 100,000) in a given time frame (e.g. per year).
Prevalence – the total number of people in a population found to have a disease at a point in time.
Number of existing cases/population/points in time.
What is absolute risk?
gives a feel for actual numbers involved i.e. it has units.
E.g. deaths/1000 population.
What is relative risk?
ratio of risk of disease in the exposed to the risk in the unexposed i.e. no units.
Incidence in exposed ÷ incidence in unexposed.
Tells us about the strength of association between a risk factor + a disease.
What is attributable risk?
the rate of disease in the exposed that may be attributed to the exposure.
Incidence in exposed – incidence in unexposed
What is relative risk reduction?
the reduction in rate of the outcome in the intervention group relative to the control group.
(Incidence in unexposed – Incidence in exposed) ÷ incidence in unexposed.
What is absolute risk reduction?
the absolute difference in the rates of events between the 2 groups. Gives an indication of the baseline risk + the intervention effect.
Incidence in unexposed – incidence in exposed
What is odds and odds ratio?
The odds of an event is the ratio of the probability of an occurrence compared to the probability of a non-occurrence.
Odds = probability ÷ (1 – probability).
Odds ratio – the ratio of odds for the exposed group to the odds for the non-exposed groups.
What are the 3 types of bias?
- selection
- information
- publication
What is the Bradford-hill criteria for assessing causality?
- Strength - The strength of the association
- Dose-response – does a higher exposure produce higher incidence?
- Consistency – similar results in different studies and populations
- Temporality – does the exposure precede the outcome
- Reversibility – removing exposure reduced risk of disease
- Biological plausibility – does it make sense biologically
- Coherence – logical consistency with lab information e.g. incidence of lung cancer with increased smoking is consistent with lab evidence that tobacco is carcinogenic
- Analogy – similarity with other established cause-effect relationships in the past e.g. thalidomide in pregnancy, not other teratogenic drugs show similar effects
- Specificity – Relationship is specific to the outcome of interest e.g. introducing helmets reduced head injuries specifically, it wasn’t that there has been an overall lower injury rate
Strong dogs can tear really big cats apart sadly
What is health behaviour?
behaviour aimed to prevent disease e.g. eating healthy
What is illness behaviour?
behaviour aimed to seek rememdy e.g. going to a doctor
What is sick role behaviour?
– behaviour aimed at getting well e.g. taking tablets and rest
What 4 things influence perception of risk? (unrealistic optimism)
- Lack of personal experience with the problem
- Belief that the problem is preventable by personal action
- Belief that if its not happened by not, its not likely to
- Believe that the problem is infrequent
no one i know has died from smoking -> ill just sop smoking later -> nothings happen and ive been smoking 20 years -> not many people die from smoking
What is the health belief model?
Perceived barriers have been demonstrated to be the most
important factor in addressing behaviour change in patients
Individuals will change if they:
1. Believe they are susceptible to the condition (perceived susceptibility)
2. Believe that it has serious consequences (perceived severity)
3. Believe that taking action reduced susceptibility (perceived benefits)
4. Believe that the costs of taking action outweigh the benefits (perceived barriers)
What are the pros and cons of the health belief model?
Advantages
1. Can be applied to wide variety of health behaviours.
2. Cues to action are unique component to the model.
3. Long standing model.
Criticism
1. Does not differentiate between first time + repeat behaviour.
2. Does not consider the influence of emotions + behaviour.
3. Cues to action often missing.
4. Alternative factors may predict health behaviour such as self-efficacy or outcome expectancy (whether they feel they will be healthier as a result).
What is the theory of planned behaviour?
Proposes that the best predictor of behaviour is intention to change behaviour.
Intention is determined by
1. Personal attitude to the behaviour
2. Social pressure to change behaviour (social norm)
3. Person’s perceived behavioural control
i think Smoking is bad -> people think smoking is bad -> i believe i can stop smoking