Public policy exam review Flashcards
(30 cards)
Different types of agendas
- Agenda universe - all subjects that are considered to be significant for political discussion
- Public agenda - subjects that are members of a political community collectively considered politically relevant
- Political agenda - selection of subjects from the public agenda
- Decision-making agenda - collection of subjects of which politicians, administrators and policy makers believe they need to be converted into actual policy programs/laws regulations
- POlicy agenda - subjects are being transferred into policy measures
Social classification of target groups (cultural perspective) types and characteristics
- The advantages - group that meets the standards
- Contenders: power but negative image
- dependents: difficult possition - seek help from others
- Deviants: social image and no power
Multiple streams approach
agenda setting as the creation or use of window of opportunity:
a. Problem stream: focusing on events (rationalism, culturalism)
b. Political stream: interests groups, shift in power (political perspective)
c. Policy stream: institutional factors (institutionalism)
Policy entrepreneurs
individuals who invest time, energy, reputation and money to promote a position fro anticipated future gain
Network analysis and network governance
- trying to combine all the different interests of many different actors
- governance brings different frames together to find a solution
Incrementalism (political perspective)
changes are made step by step - small changes instead of big ones
- muddling through: policy is constantly being adapted
Street-level buraucrats according to the perspectives
- Rational - bottom of the hierarchy so they follow orders
- POlitical - policy discretion; they are given a lot of alternatives; they react to the resources they have
- Cultural - based on experience and interpretation through a shared understanding
- Institutional - they have to follow rules and protocols - changes are difficult to make
3 types of bureaucracy
- Street-level: human interference
- Screen-level: bureaucrats operating on screens
- System-level: automatic system - growth in use of ICT
Types of oversight
- Monitoring - keeping track of whether policies are being implemented correctly
- Enforcement - what happens when a policy is violated or not respected - compliance to legal framework
- Supervision - interactions between public bodies with defined roles
Types of supervision
- Repressive (principal-agent problem): Principal tries to assess whether the agent adheres to the agreement through inspection, protocols, and indicators – single-loop learning
- Supportive (stewardship approach): learning takes place through a process of double-loop learning, which allows for a critical reflection of the appropriate policies and supervision criteria
- Polycentric: process of supervision within the broader network of stakeholders – naming and shaming
Dilemmas in monitoring, supervision and enforcement
- Position dilemma: due to different interests
a. Some agents articulate their independent positions and refuse to interact and communicate - Role dilemma: Taking risks, causing moral hazard
a. Role of supervisor:
- Interventionalist: supervise closely - eliminates the problem of moral hazard
- Non-interventionist: more distant - more chances of moral hazard - Attitude: Relation between supervisor and supervisee is based on distrust
a. Supervisee may be inclined to perform the expected behavior
b. Supervisee tries to safeguard himself from the distrust by following extensive procedures
What is systematic evaluation?
o Goals of learning and accountability are achieved systematically and periodically
o Referring to a specific event which needs a systematic evaluation
What is ad hoc evaluation?
o One-time evaluation in response to events
Ex ante and ex post evaluation?
o Ex ante: Evaluation is done before a policy is implemented
o Ex post: Evaluation is done after implementation
Input evaluation?
o Focus on resources put into a policy to achieve its aims
o Quality and quantity of inputs
Goal achievement?
o Focused on whether the policy met its objectives
Effectiveness and efficiency?
o Effectiveness: Focused on the broader outcomes of a policy
o Summative evaluations: whether formal goals were achieved
o Formative evaluations: why the goals have or have not been achieved
o Efficiency: Cost-benefit analysis
o Have the effects been efficiently achieved
Process evaluation?
o Focused on different processes involved in a policy
Internal and external?
o Internal: Performed by organizations involved in the policy
o External: Performed by outside actors
Evaluation criteria in the rational perspective
o Effectiveness, efficiency, and coherence
o Internal consistency – all stakeholders know what is expected from them
o External – one policy does not contradict another
Evaluation criteria in political perspective
o Politics of evaluation o Actors protecting their interests
o Measurement of support – policy is successful if it is supported by a sufficiently broad range of actors
Evaluation criteria in the cultural perspective
o Creation of a shared policy story
o Subjective
- a shared meaning/interpretation of a policy
o Frame of reality
o Effectiveness + efficiency are too subjective
Evaluation criteria in the institutional perspective
• Multi-rationality
o Recognizes multiple rationalities, a combination of the others
• Multiple stakeholder analysis
• Efficient, effective or coherent + feasibility (technically and organizational) of a policy
• Focus on institutional embedding – legitimacy, whether it opposes other previous policies
Six models for evaluation
- Goal-attainment model= were the results produced by the intervention
o Pro: representative of democracy
o Con:
- goals are not enough of a criteria to measure merit due to its obscurity
- unanticipated side effects are not included so a tunnel vision is adapted - Side-effects model= searches for results in the target area
- Relevant model= worth of the policy is assessed
o Similar to goal achievement - Client-oriented model= members of the target group perform the evaluation based on their own merit criteria
o User satisfaction - Stakeholder model= evaluation done by those who have interest in the intervention and its effects
- Collegial model= colleagues use their own professional criteria of standards/quality to evaluate performance of their colleagues
o Peer-review, self-evaluation