PV Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

Objectives of health products regulation group

A

Safeguard Public Health
► Ensure appropriate technical standards are met
► Facilitate recalls, product withdrawals

• Facilitate
► Access to safe, good quality, and
efficacious health products
► Support development of a high quality healthcare system

• Assure
► Instill trust, confidence & credibility of products at home & abroad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Practolol caused

A

Occulomucocutaneous reaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rofecoxib (vioxx) caused

A

MI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Medicines are licensed today on the basis of______

A

Medicines are licensed today on the basis of efficacy, safety & quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Clinical Trials designed to:

  • Test efficacy
  • Detect common ADRs (1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000)

By the time a drug is marketed:
- Usually 1,500 – 3,000 patients are exposed (ICH E1) (larger numbers for vaccine trials)

Short duration:
- 1-3 years

A

Clinical Trials designed to:

  • Test efficacy
  • Detect common ADRs (1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000)

By the time a drug is marketed:
- Usually 1,500 – 3,000 patients are exposed (ICH E1) (larger numbers for vaccine trials)

Short duration:
- 1-3 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Required sample size for detecting a rare ADR

A

Incidence
Sample size

1 in 100
300

1 in 200
600

1 in 1,000
3,000

1 in 2,000
6,000

1 in 10,000
30,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PV frame work

A

1) signal/risk detection
- monitoring ADRs to detect risks and change in R/B profile

2) risk assessment
- assessing risk-benefit profile

3) risk minimization
- minimizing risk by appropriate regulatory actions

4) risk communication
- communicating information to optimize safe and effective use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Source of signal

A

Source of a Signal: **ADR reports, a literature report, a new epidemiological study, a randomised trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Serious reports within ___ days

A

15days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Advantages of ADR reporting

A

Advantages of ADR Reporting
• Operates for all drugs given to patients
• Operates throughout the whole of the drug’s life
• Relatively inexpensive to operate
• Accessible to all physicians/dentists/pharmacists
• Can provide rapid identification of newly identified adverse drug reactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Disadvantage of adr reporting

A

• Low level of reporting
- estimated that 2-4% of all ADRs & <10% of
serious ones are reported
• Scheme requires HCPs to recognise ADRs; recognition is complicated by the many ADRs mimick naturally-occurring illnesses
• Data collected relate to suspected associations only
• Unable to provide incidence rates because of lack of denominator data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Risk minimization and management

A

Re-evaluate Approval Decisions

  1. Package Insert Amendments
  2. RestrictedAccess
  3. PostmarketStudies,Registries
  4. Suspension or Withdrawal of a Product (eg Prepulsid®, Lipobay®)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Risk communication aim

A

Aim:
• To minimise risk & enhance safe use of drugs
• Update and inform intended audience of safety issues in a timely, transparent and unbiased manner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

National policy on PV

A
  • Responsibility of governments to ensure provision of good quality, safe and effective drugs and their appropriate use
  • Requires establishment of:
  • A national drug regulatory agency; and
  • A special centre for ADR study, and maintenance of their activities

• Multidisciplinary collaboration involving different departments of the Ministry of Health and other stakeholders, such as pharmaceutical industry, universities, non-governmental organizations and professional associations for education on rational use of drugs and pharmacotherapy monitoring is of great importance

Important activities include:
• Establishment of national pharmacovigilance systems, including
national pharmacovigilance centres
• Development of necessary legislation/regulation for drug monitoring
• Development of national policy and plans of action (including costing, budgeting and financing)
• Undergraduate and continuing education of healthcare providers on safe and effective pharmacotherapy
• Continuously providing information on ADR to professionals and consumers
• Monitoring of the impact through process indicators and outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Very common =

A

> = 1/10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Common (frequent)

A

> = 1/100 AND <1/10

17
Q

Uncommon (infrequent)

A

> = 1/1000 AND <1/100

18
Q

Rare

A

> = 1/10000 AND <1/1000

19
Q

Very rare

20
Q

Criteria for Causality classes

Certain =

A

Certain:
- AE pharmacologically clear and plausible
- Chronologically well fitting challenge/dechallenge, possibly even
rechallenge
- Timing within half hour
- Lab data specifically implicating that drug

21
Q

Criteria for causality classes

Probable

A
  • AE pharmacologically plausible
  • Close temporal or spatial correlation (eg skin)
  • Recovery upon drug withdrawal (no therapy)
  • Uncommon clinical phenomenon and reasonable exclusion of other
    factors
22
Q

Criteria for causality classes

Possible

A

Possible:

  • More than 1 drug
  • Time relationship unclear
  • Causality pharmacologically not excludable
  • Chronically fitting challenge/dechallenge
  • Also explainable through alternative causes
  • Information about the AE incomplete or unclear
23
Q

Criteria for causality classes

Unlikely

A
  • Chronological sequence (challenge, dechallenge) hardly fitting
  • Plausible explanation through alternative causes
24
Q

Criteria for causality classes ranking

A
Certain 
Probable 
Possible
Unlikely 
Unclassified / unassessable
25
Cioms/Rucam drug induced liver injury (DILI) | Scoring system
- 0 or lower: Relationship with the drug excluded - 1-2: Unlikely - 3-5: Possible - 6-8: Probable - > 8: Highly probable Based on the following parameters: • History of ingestion of drugs, including complementary medicines, within 12 months of onset of illness ‐ Time of onset of reaction in association with intake of product; and discontinuation of product
26
Diagnosis of DILI • Exclusion of viral serology e.g. anti-HAV IgM, anti-HCV IgM • -ve metabolic screen (autoimmune disorders or diseases that causes liver injury) e.g. Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA), ceruloplasmin, antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) • Daily alcohol intake < 20 g • Absence of biliary or focal liver pathology on ultrasound or CT scan of abdomen
Diagnosis of DILI • Exclusion of viral serology e.g. anti-HAV IgM, anti-HCV IgM • -ve metabolic screen (autoimmune disorders or diseases that causes liver injury) e.g. Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA), ceruloplasmin, antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) • Daily alcohol intake < 20 g • Absence of biliary or focal liver pathology on ultrasound or CT scan of abdomen
27
Clinical safety data management: data elements for transmission of individual case reports
E2B
28
Periodic Benefit Risk Evaluation Report
E2C
29
Post-approval safety data: definition and stds for expedited reporting
E2D
30
PV planning
E2E
31
Mandatory submission of existing RMPs for the following categories of applications:
– New Drug Applications – Biosimilars – On Request from HSA o For example, generic products where existing local RMP is already in place for innovators (e.g. Avandia – restricted access)
32
Risk management methods
1) Educational Materials When there are important safety issues to note – Risks involving identified groups of patients – Serious safety signals that have arisen from clinical studies or post-market experience – Important parameters to monitor on regular basis 2) Letters to Healthcare Professionals • “Letter at Launch” vs Dear Healthcare Professional Letter (DHCPL) • Serious potential side effects that doctors need to be aware of • Special monitoring required • Decoupled from promotional materials • Letters will need to reach all buyers and potential prescribers 3) Sales Data Provide Broad Categories of Buyers - Companies may be required to assist in contacting buyers during investigations or implementing risk mitigation strategies 4) Special Licensing Conditions • Implemented for products with serious potential risks: – Identified in specific groups of patients – Product has important role in therapy – E.g. of products: Clozapine, Revlimid® • Product supply is bound by conditions: – E.g. for patients who have undergone special blood tests, physicians who have undergone special programmes 5) Restricted Access Programme • Implemented for products with serious potential risks : – Identified groups of patients with no suitable therapeutic alternatives – Product still has important role in therapy – Usually a post-market initiative 6) Letter of acknowledgement/undertaking and/or patient consent form: • Clozapine – safety concerns with agranulocytoisis • Natalizumab (Tysabri®, UCB Trading) – safety concern of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) • Strontium ranelate (Protos, Servier) – physician to acknowledge receipt of letter detailing RMP for Singapore • Panitumumab (Vectibix®, Amgen) – physician to acknowledge receipt of notification of inferior progression free survival and overall survival observed when Vectibix is used in combination with oxaliplatin based chemotherapy
33
Occurrence most likely signify a drug association:
Occurrence most likely signify a drug association: - SJS - TEN - Agranulocytosis - Acute dystonias ‐ Drug-induced liver injury (if confounders properly excluded) - Cushing’s syndrome (if endogeneous causes excluded) A diagnosis of an ADR is arrived after excluding all possible causes