QUANTI RESEARCH Flashcards

(71 cards)

1
Q

● It is reliable and objective.
● It uses statistics to generalize a finding.
● It reduces and restructures a complex problem to
a limited number of variables.
● It looks at the connections between variables and
establishes cause-and-effect relationships in
highly controlled circumstances.
● It tests theories or hypotheses.
It assumes that the sample is representative of
the population.
● The subjectivity of its methodology is a secondary
concern.

A

Characteristic of
Quantitative Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Characteristic of
Quantitative Research

A

● It is reliable and objective.
● It uses statistics to generalize a finding.
● It reduces and restructures a complex problem to
a limited number of variables.
● It looks at the connections between variables and
establishes cause-and-effect relationships in
highly controlled circumstances.
● It tests theories or hypotheses.
It assumes that the sample is representative of
the population.
● The subjectivity of its methodology is a secondary
concern.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • It provides statistically sound results.
  • Quantitative data provides a macro
    view
  • Generalizability
  • Evaluation of the multiple data sets
    can be done at once and at a faster
    pace and accurately.
  • It provides systematic and
    standardized comparisons.
  • The manual implementations of ideas
    can be automated completely which
    can save time.
A

Strengths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strengths

A
  • It provides statistically sound results.
  • Quantitative data provides a macro
    view
  • Generalizability
  • Evaluation of the multiple data sets
    can be done at once and at a faster
    pace and accurately.
  • It provides systematic and
    standardized comparisons.
  • The manual implementations of ideas
    can be automated completely which
    can save time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • The context of the study is ignored
  • Spend more resources
  • Results are limited.
  • Less elaboration on human perception
    and experience
  • Fixed alternative answers do not
    reflect true answers of the
    participants.
A

Weaknesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weaknesses

A
  • The context of the study is ignored
  • Spend more resources
  • Results are limited.
  • Less elaboration on human perception
    and experience
  • Fixed alternative answers do not
    reflect true answers of the
    participants.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Research follows a step-by-step process of
investigation that uses a standardized
approach in answering questions or solving
problems

A

(Polit & Beck, 2004).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

▪ Its main purpose is to answer a question or
to solve an issue

A

(Palispis, 2004).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is employed to
identify and obtain
information about the
current condition of
the phenomenon as
they exist (Mertens,
1998; Fox & Bayat,
2007).
▪ It focuses more on
the “what” of the
research subject than
the “why”.
▪ In other words, it
“describes” the
subject of the
research, without
conveying “why” it
happens.

A

Descriptive research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

type of research
design that looks at
the relationships
between two or more
variables (Cherry,
2022).

A

Correlational
Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when both
results or
variables
increase or
decrease.

A

positive correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

one result
or variable
increase while
the other decrease, or vice
versa.

A

negative correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

No rs/ no correlation at all

A

No correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

equires the
application of the
scientific method that
enables the
researcher to
establish cause-
effect relationships
among the variables
of the study and
maintain control over
all factors that may
influence the result of
an experiment
(Neuman & Neuman,
2006; Bernard &
Bernard, 2012;
Punch, 2013).

A

True experimental Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

factors that can be manipulated and
measured.

A

Variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

value” or a numerical
quantity and focus on the question “how
many” or “how much”, these values are
considered quantitative data.

A

Numeric Variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

TYPES OF NUMERIC VARIABLES

A
  1. Continuous
    Variables
  2. Discrete
    Variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

▪ Can potentially take
on an infinite number
of values.
▪ Ex: time, age,
temperature, height,
and weight

A

Continuous
Variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

▪ Variables that can
only assume whole
values within the
limits of the given
variable.
▪ Ex: number of
children in the family,
population of
students, and total
number of faculty
members

A

Discrete
Variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Variables that describe a “quality” or
“characteristic” of a data.

A

categorical variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

TYPES OF CATEGORICAL VARIABLES

A

Ordinal
Nominal
Dichotomous
Polychotomous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Variables can take
a value which can
be logically
arranged, ordered,
or ranked.
▪ Ex: ranked
academic grades,
clothing size,
measures of
attitude “strongly
agree, agree,
neutral and so on”

A

Ordinal Var.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Variables whose
values cannot be
logically arranged
(No order).
▪ Ex: color, kinds of
religion, and
various languages

A

Nominal Var

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Variables that
represent only 2
categories
▪ Ex: sex, answer
(yes or no) and
veracity (true or
false)

A

Dichotomous Var

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Variables that represent many categories. ▪ Ex: educational attainment, breed of dogs
Polychotomous Var
26
Variables whose values are independent of changes in the values of other variables.
Experimental Variables
27
TYPES OF EXPERIMENTAL VARIABLES
1. Independent Variables 2. Dependent Variables 3. Extraneous Variable
28
The variable that is being manipulated in the study
IV
29
The variable that is affected due to the manipulation of the independent variable and these variables are also tested/measured.
DV
30
Also known as “mediating”, “covariate” or “intervening” variables. ▪ These variables are already existing during the conduct of study/experiment and could influence the results of the study.
EV
31
These types of variables are somehow the same as “experimental variables”. ▪ Nonetheless, these variables are utilized in non-experimental studies.
NON EXPERIMENTAL VAR
32
TYPES OF NON-EXPERIMENTAL VARIABLES
Predictor Criterion
33
change the other variable/s in a non- experimental study.
Predictor (IV)
34
These variables are usually influenced by predictor variables.
Criterion (DV)
35
TYPES OF NON-EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES
1. Univariate 2. Bivariate 3. Polyvariate/ Multivariate
36
Only one variable is being studied.
Univariate
37
Two variables are being studied.
Bivariate
38
More than two variables are being studied.
Polyvariate/ Multivariate
39
vital for the pursuit of any study. ▪ It provides a brief yet accurate representation of the study.
RESEARCH TITLE
40
trailed by and enumeration of the specific problems. ▪ The specific problems are usually stated as questions that the researcher seeks to answer.
SOP
41
TYPES OF RESEARCHABLE QUESTIONS
Factor- isolating Questions Factor- relating Questions Situation- producing Questions Situation- relating Questions
42
▪ “What is this?” ▪ These questions isolate, categorize, describe, or name factors and situations.
Factor- isolating Questions
43
“What is happening here?” ▪ These questions aim to determine the relationship among factors that are identified. ▪ These questions are for non-experimental types of research.
Factor- relating Questions
44
▪ “How can I make this happen?” ▪ These questions tend to set goals for actions, develop plans and ideas for these goals, and identify the conditions for these goals to be fulfilled.
Situation- producing Questions
45
What will happen if?” ▪ These questions usually yield hypothesis testing or research which are experimental by design.
Situation- relating Questions
46
Rationalization of the need to research on the problem. ▪ Clarification of the important terminologies for the reader to easily understand what the research is about. ▪ Establishment of the degree of seriousness of the problem which prompted the researcher to look for solutions.
BOTS
47
Included and excluded variables in your study.
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION
48
contribution of study to the body of knowledge.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
49
is formulated from existing theories and serves as the foundation of the study. ▪ The present study can adopt the original model used by the cited theorist. ▪ However, the researcher can modify the variables of the original framework to better suit the study, provided that the whole theory is utilized
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
50
1. Name/s of the authors/s 2. Title/s of their theory/ies 3. Theoretical statement or principles 4. Explanation of the theoretical statement 5. Relationship of the theory to the present study
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
51
is a method, model, or pattern for conducting research. ▪ It is a set of ideas, beliefs, or understandings within which theories and practices can function. ▪ The majority
RESEARCH PARADIGM
52
This model is used when the research attempts to determine or isolate the variable/s that cause a problem, subject, or
IPO MODEL
53
This model is used in experimental studies. The questions raised are usually situation- relating.
IV-DV MODEL
54
This model is used when relating and assessing the influence between two or more variables. Studies that focus on relationships between variables, associations of different factors, differences among concepts, etc. will benefit from this model.
PC MODEL ( NON EXPERIMENTAL)
55
tentative prediction about the relationship among variables in a study.
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
56
formulated for statistical analysis. ▪ It is expressed in a negative statement.
NULL HYPOTHESIS
57
A type of research hypothesis that the researcher expects to be true in his or her study.
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS
58
according to Cresswell (2018)
qualitative research includes a substantially less amount of literature compared to quantitative research.
59
PURPOSE OF A LITERATURE REVIEW
Provide framework for establishing the importance of the study. ▪ Identify areas of research studies that has been studied and explored before to prevent duplication and give credit to other researchers. ▪ Identify need for additional research. ▪ Identify inconsistencies: gaps in research, conflicts in previous studies.
60
STEPS IN WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW THEMATICALLY
Begin by identifying key words (major variables) which is useful in locating materials in a library. 2. Search the key words in the databases. 3. Initially, try to locate two related studies. ▪ The studies are related to the present study when they have the following similarities: 3.1 They use the same variables, sub- variables, concepts or constructs. 3.2 They have the same subject or topic. 4. Read, collect, highlight, and annotate those that are central to your topic. (RRL part of your related study). 5. As you identify useful literature (in step 4), begin designing a literature map. This is a visual picture (or figure) of groupings of the literature on the topic. ▪ Literature map will help you in arranging the content of your related literature in a thematic manner. Begin by identifying key words (major variables) which is useful in locating materials in a library. 2. Search the key words in the databases. 3. Initially, try to locate two related studies. ▪ The studies are related to the present study when they have the following similarities: 3.1 They use the same variables, sub- variables, concepts or constructs. 3.2 They have the same subject or topic. 4. Read, collect, highlight, and annotate those that are central to your topic. (RRL part of your related study). 5. As you identify useful literature (in step 4), begin designing a literature map. This is a visual picture (or figure) of groupings of the literature on the topic. ▪ Literature map will help you in arranging the content of your related literature in a thematic manner.
61
STEPS IN WRITING A STUDY REVIEW CHRONOLOGICALLY
1. Read three related studies. 2. Highlight and take note each of the following: 2.1 The name of the author, date, and the setting of the study 2.2 The title 2.3 The salient findings, which are the most important “ingredients” to include. 3. Write a paragraph containing the author, date, setting, title, and paraphrase salient findings or results. 4. Arrange them according to recency: past to present. Use transitional word to proceed from one study to another. 5. End the review of related studies with a summary of the results.
62
COMBINING RRL & RRS
▪ For Literature: 1. Introduction 1.1 Define the topic which gives a proper background for reviewing the literature. 1.2 Establish researcher’s reasons (point of view) for reviewing the literature. 1.3 Give explanation on the organization of the review (sequence). 1.4 State what literature is included and not included (scope). 2. Body 2.1 Cluster the literature based on common themes. 2.2 Give insight into relationship between central topic and a larger discipline. 2.3 Proceed from the general to wider analysis of the research under review to the specific problem. Conclusion 3.1 Sum up major contributions of literature. 3.2 Evaluate the current “state of the art” literature reviewed. 3.3 Point out any major flaws or gaps in research. 3.4 Outline issues pertinent to future study.
63
FOR STUDIES
1. Introduction 1.1 Explain the scope of the studies review. 2. Body 2.1 Present several research studies with the following parts: (refer to the instruction of the teacher on the number of studies needed to present). 2.2 Name, author, year, and the setting of the study 2.3 The title 2.4 The salient (important) findings, which are the most important ingredients to include since the discussion of the variables and their relationship will be based on them. 3. Conclusion 3.1 Synthesize all the salient findings of the research studies you have presented in the body. 3.2 State the implication to your research studies.
64
is a question or a problem that has not been answered by any of the existing studies or research within your field. Sometimes, a research gap exists when there is a concept or new idea that hasn't been studied at all.
research gap
65
Results from studies allow for conclusions in their own right but are contradictory when examined from a more abstract point of view.
EVIDENCE GAP
66
Desired research findings do not exist.
KNOWLEDGE GAP
67
Professional behavior or practices deviate from research findings or are not covered by research.
Practical- Knowledge Gap
68
A variation of research methods is necessary to generate Bew insights or to avoid destoned findings.
. Methodological Gap
69
Research findings or propositions need to be evaluated or empirically
Empirical Gap
70
Theory should be applied to certain research issues to generate new insights. There is lack of theory thus a gap exists.
Theoretical Gap
71
Research regarding the population that is not adequately represented or under-researched in the evidence base or prior research.
Population Gap