Quaternary Flashcards
(70 cards)
How did Pleistocene climate affect mammal distribution
typified by high levels of climatic fluctuations- many mammals show fluctuations in ranges according to advancing and retreating of different vegetation types eg. cold-adapted pikas and steppe woolly rhinos
Due to niche tracking or contractions in range due to local extinction? Unsure
North American mammal families through Eocene to Pleistocene suggest that niche conservationism is ubiquitous through deep time, and that range expansions and contractions are typical (DeSantis et al., 2012)
eg. Range of Panthera leo appears to have contracted with a southwards shift, but is due to extinction of cave lion, Pathera leo spelaean
Some probably due to migration- modern elephants migrate long distances (Purdon et al., 2018), and it’s thought megafaunal migrations even more frequent in past (Harris et al., 2009)
Climatic contributions to end Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions
Increased precipitation during interstadials caused a rise in dense vegetation, decreasing the quantity of forbs, much of many megafaunal diets (Willerslev et al., 2014)?
Eurasia, woolly rhino, Coelodonta antiquiatis, extinct due to increased precipitation ~13.9ka BP, herbaceous vegetation replaced by shrubs and trees (Stuart and Lister, 2012)
Repeated interstadial warming events used to explain staggered extinction patterns in Eurasia (Cooper et al., 2015)
Due to increase in stability at end of epoch? Megafauna favoured b y variable conditions of Pleistocene due to increased metabolic efficiency, starvation resistance, ability to migrate (Mann et al., 2019)
Change to climatic stability disadvantageous, leading to extinction
Human contributions to end Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions
Likely no single cause and that each species’ extinction different (Lorenzen et al., 2011)- use species distribution models and aDNA to demonstrate each had own response to climatic shifts and human arrival- most cases due to combo, esp. in Holarctic
However, almost certain human role (Sandom et al., 2014)
Pattern of overlap between humans and the mammals that went extinct preclude a Blitzkreig model, of arrival and then immediate extinction- actual interaction much more complicated.
In N. America, due to top-down effects of the addition of another top predator into a predator-limited system, causing predator competition (Ripple & Van Valkenburgh, 2010)
Humans= dominant super predators, kill adult prey at higher trophic levels (Darimont et al., 2015).
Animals preferentially killed by humans at end of Pleistocene
Large organisms, provide more meat for hunters and had slower reproductive rates (Lyons et al., 2009)
Slowly reproducing organisms regardless of size (those with a slow reproductive rate that survived where arboreal, nocturnal or lived in closed habitats) (Johnson et al., 2002) - ‘bradyfaunal’ extinction
Effects of megafaunal extinctions on ecosystems
Widespread vegetational change
Australia, led to rise of sclerophyllous vegetation (Rule et al., 2012)
Holarctic, woody plants became dominant
Beringia, led to rise of Betula in pollen record (Doughty et al., 2010) which would have caused regional warming of up to 1 degree due to albedo effects.
Megafauna = ecosystem engineers therefore high ecosystem function (Galetti et al., 2018)
Siberia, trampling by megafauna would have exposed soil to the air, allowing it to cool. Since loss, Siberian soil has warmed, pts permafrost at risk of melting (Zimov & Zimov, 2014). Melt would release huge amount of methane, accelerating global warming and biodiversity loss.
Ecometrics
Study of how functional traits interact with the environment over time.
eg. calcaneum gear ratio in carnivores = functional trait correlated with vegetation type
Investigating how gear ratio changes over time shows that the average gear ratio during LGM of Indiana was equivalent to that of 1800AD, whereas by 1900, had changed on average due to arrival of agriculture and extirpation of species (Polly & Head, 2015)
The Island syndrome
shorten limbs
change in body mass (The Island Rule)- small become large and large become small (Foster, 1964)
shortened rostrum
reduced sexual dimorphism
increased tameness- ecological naivete may offer explanation for extinctions (End-Pleistocene? Definitely for some Holocene mammal extinctions eg. warrah killed by Gauchos for fur- extinct in 1876)
coordinated evolution of all these traits at once due to changes in neural crest pathways that affect development early in embryonic history (Sanchez-Villagra et al., 2016). Relaxation of selection pressures on islands, and their lower genetic diversity due to Founder effect means that mutation can drive rapid evolution
Faunal turnover events
episodes of synchronous appearance and disappearance of species from a community, often resulting in a net change in species richness
Locally, determined by relative rates of speciation, extinction, immigration and emigration
Relative turnover = (last appearance + first appearance)/total number of species
Turnover greatest for mammals in Miocene and Pleistocene, compared to other groups
Climatic change in Pleistocene
Alternating environmental change
Through large scale Milankovitch Cycles and smaller events eg. Dansgaard-Oeschger Cycles or Heinrich events
Changes were short and reversible- not really enough time for many genetic changes to accumulate in populations to drive speciation as a result of changing selection regimes— Barnosky (2001) argues that cyclical climate oscillations select against organisms that respond to them by speciation
Sagebrush Vole changes
first lower molar changes from 4 triangular cusps in ancient voles to 5 or 6 currently
evo change associated with warming event during Pleistocene (Barnosky & Bell, 2003)
Adaptations for cold
Fur
woolly mammoth haemoglobin could function over a wider temperature range because had more chloride binding sites, changing amount of heat released during binding
Turnover-Pulse hypothesis
Vrba, 1993
climate change events drive periods of high faunal turnover
often opposed by Red Queen Hypothesis that turnover rate is constant rather than pulsed, and is controlled by biotic interactions (better fit for Pleistocene mammals, speciation rates not high enough to fit T-P hypothesis)
Pleistocene mammal turnover
Higher than normal
up to 50% of divisions between extant sister taxa occurred during Pleistocene (Avise et al., 1998)
as a result of complex interactions between causal factors and responses:
-behavioural accommodation
-distributional shifts
-ecophenotypic modification (non-genetic)
-evolution (anagenesis or cladogenesis)
-extinction
Comparison between Middle to Late Miocene and Quaternary suggests an increased mammalian turnover in Europe, at least partly owing to enhanced levels of speciation and extinction
Fossil record shows that almost all modern mammal species, at least in Europe and Northern Asia are Quaternary in Origin
Climatic oscillations favoured large-bodied organisms because
increased metabolic and locomotary efficiency
starvation resistance
long lifespan
ability to migrate
but have higher orientation and extinction rates than smaller mammals, perhaps because less able to ‘sleep or hide’ in response to threat (Hsiang Liow et al., 2008)
Megafauna definition
Any animal above 44kg
4 potential drivers for Pleistocene extinction
Overkill
Climate Change
Extraterrestrial impact
Hyperdisease
Hyperdisease hypothesis and extraterrestrial impact hypothesis
Inconsistent with preferentially targeting of megafauna
Also inconsistent with asynchronous patterns of extinctions
Generic extinction rates in each continent
Australia - 88% (due to isolation, naivety of native organisms, or taxonomic composition w more marsupials??) S. America - 83% N. America - 72% Eurasia - 36% Africa - 18% Barnosky et al., 2004
Extinctions of megafauna in Africa
Lowest because location of human evolution, therefore megafauna had evolved alongside for longer and less naïve
Mammals here had earlier extinctions during Plio-Pleistocene transition and throughout Early and Middle Pleistocene
Lost its large carnivore functional diversity before 2Ma as a result of competition with human hunters (Werdelin and Lewis, 2013)
megaherbivores lost 4.6Ma before human hunting due to climate change (Faith et al., 2018)
aDNA of sediments
contains plant aDNA- DNA metabarcoding of plant diversity demonstrates decline in forbs coinciding with decline in megafauna
Coprolites suggest megafaunal diets had high forb content
Plaid-stripes model
Holocene is ‘striped world’ with clear latitudinal climatic bands
Pleistocene is ‘plaid world’ with dramatic fluctuations
Climate change from one to other as a driver for megafaunal extinctions?
Blitzerieg model
Martin, 1973
Human hunting of megafauna so quick that there was no time for archaeological evidence to accumulate
Few believe anymore, accurate radiocarbon dating demonstrates that humans and other megafauna coexisted for far too long to drive a near immediate disappearance
Evidence of human hunting
On every continent
eg. killing and butchering site in Pampas of Argentina shows hunting giant ground sloth Megatherium americanum (Politis et al, 2019)
Australia, fungus Sporormiella has been used to show pattern of megafaunal decline matches spread of humans, and in Tasmania arrival of humans was v quickly followed by extirpation (Rule et al., 2012)
Wrangel island
eg. extinction of mammoths, which were driven to refugia like Wrangel Island due to vegetational shifts (between 40,000 and 6000 years ago, the climatic envelope suitable for them decreased by 90%). Wrangel island separated from mainland 12,000 years ago, offered steppic refuge for those isolated with it.
Estimated to be 180cm shoulder height compared to 320cm on mainland
Final pop went extinct quickly at same time as human arrival, 4000 years ago, as demonstrated by autosomal microsatellite markers (Nystrom et al., 2012)
Range contractions increase vulnerability to extinction through decreased and restricted populations, humans finish off