Quiz 1 Flashcards

(55 cards)

1
Q

Language used to motivate, inspire, inform, or persuade readers and/ or listeners; used in argument

A

Rhetoric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Figures of speech and other literary devices used in rhetoric

A

Rhetorical Devices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

List Parts of an Argument and their meanings

A

Claim: your position
Support: data, references, facts, statistics
Warrant: connection between support + claim
Logic: how well was connection between claim + support
Think about the Audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List the 3 Types of Claims and their meanings

A

Fact: factual + data
Value: Judgement
Policy: Should or should nots

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

7List the 2 Types of Support

A

Factual: data and studies
Expert Opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

List the parts of Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle

A

Logos: Logic; the arguments you are making
Pathos: Empathy; the emotion you elicit from your audience
Ethos: your credibility; does speaker use sound logic, good sources, and honest presentation of topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The concept of assumption that ties data to your thesis; the point you are trying to make about the thesis; reasons/ reasoning; logic

A

Warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What to look for when evaluating Evidence

A

is it current, sufficient, relevant, representative, consistent with audience’s experience, does it stray from credible sources, is it clearly defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Another word for Inductive Logic

A

Informal Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Take smaller premise to come to a large conclusion; conclusion is built on lower/ smaller observations

A

Inductive Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The jump from premises to conclusions

A

Inductive Leap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Begin with major, all-encompassing premise first; have a second smaller one that depends on the first premise; first relationship between premises must be sound for conclusion to be sound

A

Deductive Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

System of reasoning involving three proposition

A

Syllogism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The parts of syllogism

A

Major Premise
Minor Premise
Conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Specific errors in reasoning that arise in the flow of inductive and deductive logic; problematic jump in your conclusion

A

Logical Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defects that weaken an argument

A

Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Meaning of ad populum

A

to the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Arguer takes advantage of the desire most people have to be liked and to fit in with others and uses that desire to get the audience to accept their argument

A

Ad Populum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Common type of Ad Populum

A

Bandwagon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Arguer tries to convince audience to do. believe something because everyone else supposedly does

A

Bandwagon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Arguer sets up situation so it looks like only two choices then eliminates one choice so it seems that there is only one option; this option is what arguer wanted you to originally pick

A

False Dichotomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Making assumptions on a group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate; usually it is atypical or just too small

A

Hasty Generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Applies an assumption to all cases without recognizing any possible exceptions

A

Sweeping Generalization

24
Q

What does post hoc, ergo proptor hoc

A

after this, therefore because of this

25
What is post hoc also known as
False Cause
26
Assuming that because b comes after a, a must have caused b
Post Hoc/ False Cause
27
Relying on an analogy between 2 or more objects, ideas, or situations; if 2 things being compared aren't alike in their relevant respects, analogy is a weak one causing logical fallacy
Weak Analogy
28
We add strength to argument by referring to respected sources/ authority and explaining their position on issue being discussed
Appeal to Authority
29
Takes place when arguer tries to get people to accept a conclusion by making them feel sorry for someone
Appeal to Pity
30
Logical fallacy based on time
Appeal to Chronology
31
Based on age; something is good or better because it is older and proven
Appeal to Tradition
32
Something is somehow better solely because it is new; newness is evidence of truth
Appeal to Novelty
33
Ad Hominem meaning
Against the person
34
Tu quoque meaning
And you too!
35
Conclusion usually is that you shouldn't believe another's argument; attacking the person themself rather than their argument
Ad Hominem
36
Arguer claims that a sort of chain reaction, usually ending in a dire consequence, will take place, but there isn't enough evidence for the assumption; inevitable consequences
Slippery Slope
37
Asks the reader to simply accept the conclusion without real evidence; relies on premise (says same thing as conclusion) or ignore an important (but questionable) assumption that the argument rests on
Begging the Question/ Circular Logic
38
Partway between argument, arguer goes off on tangent, raising side issue that distracts audience from what's really at stake; arguer never returns to the original issue
Red Herring
39
When a speaker/ writer addresses an opposing view or speaker and attacks their argument or character
Attack
40
The presentation of only one side of an issue or viewpoint and is used subjectively to influence an audience
Bias
41
Using the ideas or feelings that a certain word invokes to create certain emotional responses in an audience
Connotation
42
Using an exact or precise meaning of a word, not an implies idea
Denotation
43
Establishes authority and reliability and is used to gain the confidence and trust of the audience
Ethos
44
The representation of something as greater than is the case and is used to grab the attention of the audience and emphasize certain points
Exaggeration
45
Uses facts or information that indicate whether a view is true or valid and is used to give weight to an argument or belief
Evidence
46
Creates imagery and express things non-literally; can help make an idea more emotive, vivid and convincing
Figurative Language
47
Infers that a claim is true for most people and is used to speak to prevailing beliefs or prejudices of an audience
Generalization
48
Special words or expressions used by a profession or certain groups; used to signal expertise and establish credibility
Jargon
49
Language like we or us to get a reader to agree with a claim
Inclusive Language
50
Words charged with an underlying meaning or implication and are used to produce emotion in an audience
Loaded Words
51
Involved thinking and forming judgements logically; used to appeal to the rationality of an audience
Logos
52
Includes feelings accentuated by experiencing love, hate, fear, etc.; an appeal to emotion is used to engage with an audience and create an emotional response
Pathos
53
The recurrence of certain words or phrases and is used to emphasize certain ideas making them more memorable
Repetition
54
Statements which are voiced as questions but are not expected to be answered; used to imply certain answers and draw audiences to certain conclusions
Rhetorical Questions
55
Uses groups of three adjectives or phrases to make an idea memorable
Rule of Three