Quiz 1 Flashcards
(27 cards)
Philosophy
the rational attempt to formulate, understand, and answer fundamental questions
Fundamental questions
“basic” questions; has to do with what is primary; radical and abstract questions
- Based on definition
- Based on model
To problematize what we think we know
Take our knowledge and not just accept it, but find an alternative story (critical approach)
-Critiquing and rethinking what we think we know
Speculative approach to philosophy
more traditional; to generate knowledge
4 main branches of Philosophy (Western)
- Metaphysics
- Epistemology
- Axiology
- Logic
Metaphysics
- purpose: to develop a theory of reality or a theory of what is genuinely real
- Distinction between appearance and reality
- “Why is there something rather than nothing?”
Epistemology
- study of knowledge and truth
- Distinction between knowledge and opinion
- Look for a definition of truth and wonder and how we can distinguish truth from error
- True for everyone? Or is truth subjective? Only to some communities?
Axiology (Value Theory)
study of value and distinction between value and fact
- Ethics
- Aesthetics
Ethics
-questions about how to lead a morally good life
-Rules or standards vs. human virtues (qualities)
-Applied ethics
Attempts to decide what values and principles we should use to judge human action as morally right or wrong
Aesthetics
- deals with values we associate with art and beauty
- Different aesthetic judgements and vocab
Logic
- the study of principles of correct reasoning
- Principles to guide the reasoning process
Rationality
has to do with the way we proceed to investigate matters, settle disputes, evaluate evidence, and assess peoples’ behaviors, practices, and beliefs
Rationalists
get knowledge through exercising reason
-claim that foundational principles of rationality amount to “clear and distinct ideas” that are innate in the human mind or can be discovered by a careful and critical analysis of our beliefs
Foundationalism
there are standards we can appeal to in order to determine if a belief, view or action is rational
Standards are:
1. Objective
2. Universal
3. Infallible
4. Self-evident
-There is only ONE set of correct standards (only one form of rationality)
Rationalist Foundationalists
believe the standards are certain forms/ structures of reasoning (logical laws and rules of inference) and/or a privileged set of ideas (standards come from reasoning)
- Laws of Logic: Law of noncontradiction, Law of excluded middle, Law of identity
- Rules of Inference
- Clear and distinct ideas: ideas that are so evident that all grounds for doubt are excluded
Laws of Logic
Law of noncontradiction
Law of excluded middle
Law of identity
Law of noncontradiction
no statement can be both true and false
Law of excluded middle
every statement is either true or it is false; there is no third position
Law of identity
A=A. A thing is what it is and is identical with itself. It is not another thing.
Rules of Inference
rules about how we infer things from previous things
If a, then b
(If santa is believed to be jolly, then santa exists
Santa is believed to be jolly, therefore santa exists)
Empiricist Foundationalists
- believe the standards are sense impressions
- “Seeing is believing”
- Making observations through the senses → sense data
- Empiricism is an epistemological position
Constructivism
-there are no standards that are not conditioned in important ways by culture, history, language, community, etc., so there are no objective and universal standards.
-Can take the form of relativism
Rationality is a social construction
Relativism
holds the standards of rationality (cognitive relativism) and/or ethics (ethical relativism) are relative to a community, culture, language group, etc.
-Consistent relativist can accept that from some (relative) point of view, the theory is false, irrational
Pluralism
- there may be more than one set of standards and/or truths
- Convinced that we can learn from one another and that it’s good to try to discover common ground among different sets of standards
- Willing to appeal to a variety of standards in order to reach a conclusion, but does not assume that all standards are equally valuable
- Accepts fallibility, and admits that we cannot reach a clear answer
- Underlying value: understanding one another