Quiz 4 Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

One or more groups of subjects exposed to one or more levels of the independent variable

A

Group Design (Quantitative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can include multiple subjects but not analyzed as a group. Individual behavior.

A

Single Subject Design (Quantitative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Young vs Old subjects with various levels of noise added to speech recognition task

This is an example of what type of research design?

A

Group design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Look at effects of various types of phonemic training in a child or children with reading issues

This is an example of what type of research design?

A

Single Subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Different groups of subjects are exposed to different levels of the independent variable(s)

A

Between subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Same subjects are exposed to different levels of the independent variable(s)

A

Within-subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What group design needs to account for group equivalence?

A

Between subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What group design needs to account for a sequencing effect?

A

Within-subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are two strategies to help with group equivalence in between subject designs?

A

Subject randomization and subject matching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How to counterbalance the potential sequencing effect in within-subject designs?

A

Sequence randomization and counter balancing (ABCD, BCDA, CDAB, DABC, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the test validity measures?

A

Face
Content
Predictive
Concurrent
Convergent
Discriminant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does it look and sound like it accurately measures the construct?

A

Face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the test measure the relevant domains of the construct?

A

Content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does the test predict things it should be able to predict?

A

Predictive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does the test discriminate between relevant groups?

A

Concurrent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does the test get similar scores/results to other tests measuring the same thing?

17
Q

Does the test get different results than other tests measuring different constructs?

18
Q

The extent to which an experiment accurately measures what it intended to measure

A

Internal experimental validity

19
Q

The extent to which the results of an experiment can be generalized to a larger context

A

External experimental validity

20
Q

What are the threats to internal experimental variability?

A

History
Maturation
Reactive Pretest
Instrumentation
Statistical regression
Differential subject selection
Attrition
Interaction of factors
Crediability

21
Q

What are the threats to external experimental variability?

A

Subject selection
Interactive pretest
Reactive arrangements (Hawthorne Effect)
Multiple treatment interference

22
Q

Every member has an equal chance of being picked

A

Simple random sampling

23
Q

Population divided into subgroups with random samples taken from each

A

Stratified random sampling

24
Q

extraneous events that occur between the first
measurement and subsequent measurements

25
changes that might naturally occur over time which happen during the course of a study
Maturation
26
Additional treatment received during the study Is an example of what type of threat to internal validity?
History
27
Effect of treatment in acute aphasia vs effect of spontaneous recovery Is an example of what type of threat to internal validity?
Maturation
28
taking a test once may affect subsequent administrations of that test
Reactive prestest
29
changes in measurement due to calibration issues, or changes in observers/scorers, etc
Instrumentation
30
When subjects are selected based on atypical scores (good or poor), there is likely some variability in how far from average they scored – in subsequent tests they may score closer to average
Statistical regression
31
failure to balance extraneous factors across groups leading to existing differences in the dependent variable at baseline
Differential subject selection *need to control during studies
32
When subjects drop out of a study, there may be something systematic about who leaves, that will affect interpretation of results
Attrition
33
combination of other validity threats (e.g. differential selection and maturation)
Interaction of factors
34
making alternative hypotheses implausible -Can be affected by researcher bias or researcher reactivity
Credibility