Quote Analysis Flashcards
(68 cards)
“That a surgeon must possess direct knowledge of the complexions of the body and its parts, and of medicines, is demonstrated in this way through a concrete case (experimentum). Suppose that two men of identical age are wounded at the same moment and in the same location—say, pierced through the middle of the arm by a sword or a similar blade. However, one of them is of a hot and humid [i.e. sanguine] complexion and the other is cold and dry [i.e. bilious]. The practice and prevailing view of laymen concludes that both can be treated in the same way, but the science of complexion, which is confirmed rationally by the practice of surgery, teaches us that both cannot be cured in one and the same way” (Lanfranc of Milan, 239).
Surgery is guided by Scientia: theory and practice are mutually supportive
“a disputed question is a regular form of teaching, apprenticeship and research, presided over by a master, characterized by a dialectical method which consists of bringing forward and examining arguments based on reason and authority which oppose one another on a given theoretical or practical problem and which are furnished by participants, and where the master must come to a doctrinal solution by an act of determination which confirms him in his function as master” (Bazán, 1985, 40).
•One of the distinctive forms in which contested issues were debated in the university classroom was the ‘disputation question’.
“In sum, correct operation having its principles in the art, and following the way of demonstration, depends on a twofold habit, namely what is knowable and teachable, which is in the intellective mind and from experimental habit, that is, acquired through the exercise of the art upon particular cases. This habit is teachable, but [as something] to which one can become accustomed, as we said, and then the practitioner is made perfect” (228).
Lafranc’s observation about the integrated nature of theory and practice, is elaborated in the 14th century by Gentile of Foligno (University of Bologna), in his influential commentary on the Canon of Avicenna.
Foligno employs the method of disputation to consider whether medicine is a science (Scientia) or an art (ars)—in the sense of a merely mechanical art. His answer, having weighed both alternatives, is that it bridges this divide:
“On the one hand, there is a demonstration of His separateness, may He be exalted, from the world and of His being free from it; and on the other hand, there is a demonstration that the influence of His governance and providence . . . exists” (178).
The rationality and interconnectedness of the cosmos require a stable, governing force (the fifth body), else the elements would never maintain order and mixture; in turn, the heavens must be moved by an intelligence, which confers on them the power to move and ensoul natural beings (through emanation). That intelligence is Deity. But in order for Deity to ground the eternal procession of the heavens, through endless time, it must stand outside of time and contingency—it must be meta-physical.
“So by observing such things and connecting them to the appropriate heavenly beings, the ancient wise men brought divine powers into the region of mortals, attracting them through likeness” (p.138).
‘As above, so below’: Visible analogies and resemblances disclose occult connections between earthly beings and celestial principles.
“He [Dhu’l Nun] professed the art of alchemy and belongs to the same class as Jabir ibn Hayyan. He devoted himself to the science of esoterics (ilm u’l batin) and became proficient in many branches of philosophy. He used to frequent the ruined temple (barba) in Akhmim . . . And it is said that knowledge of the mysteries therein was revealed to him by the way of saintship; and he wrought miracles” (Al-Qifti, History of the Philosophers, trans. Nicholson, “A Historical Enquiry Concerning the Origin and Development of Sufism” (p.311,1906)).
The association of alchemy with the secret meanings of the hieroglyphs can be traced back to the writings of Zosimos. It has been suggested that a more or less continuous tradition of Egyptian alchemy may have persisted in Akhmim (Panopolis) into Islamic times. Dhu’l Nun seems to have been an important tributary bridging the pagan and Islamic traditions.
“All things pray according to their own order and sing hymns, either intellectually or rationally, or naturally and sensibly, to heads of entire chains. And since the heliotrope is also moved toward that to which it readily opens, if anyone hears it striking the air as it moves about, he perceives in the sound that it offers the king the kind of hymn that a plant can sing” (138).
“In as much as the fifth body as a whole is engaged perpetually in a circular motion, it thus engenders forced motion in the elements because of which they leave their places . . . In consequence a mixture of the elements comes about . . . changes occur in the mixture so that . . . the various species of minerals, then all the species of plants, then many species of living beings in accordance with what is determined by the composition of the mixture” (171).
“Yet, nevertheless, every one holds, and I believe, that they (the heavens), and not the earth, are so moved, for “God created the orb of the earth, which will not be moved” (Ps. 92:1), notwithstanding the arguments to the contrary. [This is] because they are ‘persuasions’ which do not make the conclusions evident . . . Thus, that which I have said by way of diversion in this manner can be valuable to refute and check those who would impugn our faith by argument” (Oresme, 261).
If scientific theories are not metaphysical absolutes, how do we choose between them?
Reason cannot ultimately determine any general principle of physics (e.g. whether the universe is created or eternal). Thus when faced with competing alternatives we should either accept the simplest theory consistent with the facts (Ockham’s razor), or where the authority of scripture is unambiguous, we should follow the teachings of the faith.
•Though the principle of parsimony is a useful heuristic device, its force is merely “persuasive” and rhetorical; it doesn’t satisfy the demands of certainty:
“the immaterial and immortal part of the human soul, the ‘intellective soul,’ is not individual or personal but a unitary intellect shared by all humans” (Lindberg, 290).
•Averroes was followed in this teaching by Siger de Brabant, a prominent & influential lecturer in the faculty of arts at Paris. Averroism was officially condemned as heresy in 1270.
Yet the magus, who possessed the special gift of being able to “see” nature’s secrets, could manipulate them to produce wonders beyond the abilities of ordinary humans (Eamon, 135)
•Through initiation the adept became one with the Hidden Divinity behind the cosmos and was able to “see into” the secret forms and patterns of reality. This gnosis was not just a theoretical knowledge, but a transformation of the very being of the adept to a god-like state in which they not only saw like God but acted like God:
“Know that . . . the forces that come from heaven to this world are four: [1] the force that necessitates the mixture . . . this force suffices to engender the minerals; [2] the force that gives to each plant a vegetal soul; [3] the force that gives to each animal an animal soul; [4] the force that gives to every rational being a rational faculty” (172).
Preface, “Thessalos the Philosopher on the Virtues of Herbs”
(1st-2nd century CE)

•The pilgrim discovers a secret book of alien wisdom, which points him beyond the limits of conventional or accepted knowledge—but he struggles to decode the book;
“The influence of the moon is also seen in the things that are beneath it and is particularly evident in wet things, so that it is seen in the flow and ebb of the sea, and in the regular flow of menstruation, and in the growth and diminution of brains and bone marrow” (242).
The Summary on Crises and Critical Days (anonymous, 13th century)
“The Law has given us a knowledge of a matter the grasp of which is not within our power, and the miracle attests to the correctness of our claims . . . Know that with a belief in the creation of the world in time, all the miracles become possible and the Law becomes possible, and all questions that may be asked on this subject, vanish. Thus it may be said: Why did God give prophetic revelation to this one and not to that?” (181).
God’s providence is inscrutable
“Aristotle regarded the deity, the Prime Mover, as eternally unchanging and therefore incapable of intervening in the operation of the cosmos; the cosmic machinery thus runs inevitably and unchangeably onward, initiating a chain of causes and effects that descend into and pervade the sub-lunar realm. The danger here is that within the Aristotelian framework no room can be found for miracles” (196).
“some people, in choosing the time for bloodletting, insist on diligent attention to the state of the heavens. And, of these, some are particularly attentive to the quarters of the moon, because the moon exerts power over the moist parts of the body and because it is the planet closest to us . . . But Galen . . . the Prince [Avicenna] and Averroes pay little heed to this. This is because the heavens are the most remote cause of human dispositions and it is enough for the doctor to understand their more immediate causes. It is also because the judgments of astrology are for the most part uncertain, unstable, ambiguous and often deceptive . . . due to the diversity of intermediate causes and circumstances and of countless different things that often impede and check the influence of the heavens” (245).
Do the stars control only the regular cycles of nature (the seasons), or do they determine the idiosyncrasies of human destiny? Can a person’s fate be predicted based on the condition of the stars and planets at their time of birth?
Critics of astrology, like Jacques Despar (University of Paris, 15th cen.), argued that the planets are not as directly impactful on the course of a person’s life and health as medical astrologers claimed:
“When magicians do what holy men do, they do it for a different end and by a different right. The former do it for their own glory: the latter, for the glory of God: the former by certain private compacts: the latter by the evident assistance and command of God, to whom every creature is subject” (Aquinas, quoting Augustine, Summa theologica).
The power of the relics was “miraculous,” whereas pagan “magic” (allegedly) worked through demonic agency
When the magician turns to demons (whether he believes them to be demons or not) he enters, knowingly or unknowingly, into a “private compact” with them.
•(b) §§ 3–5: empirical evidence against sky’s rotation
(i) § 3: changes in relative motion alone can be detected: “one can perceive movement only in such a way as one perceives one body to be differently disposed in comparison with another”.
(ii) § 4: the earth’s atmosphere moves with the earth: “if air were enclosed in a moving ship, it would seem to the person situated in this air that it was not moved”.
(iii) § 5: and so does a vertical projectile, which would move with a combination of linear and circular motion, due to the eastward movement of the atmosphere.
“In the poison of the dragon lies the highest medicine: Mercury, properly and chemically precipitated or sublimated, resolved into its proper water, and again coagulated”
Ismaili alchemy introduced the key concept of the al-iksir, which later became the elixir or philosopher’s stone of the European tradition. The volatile mercury, the prime matter of the metals, had to be coagulated by the vapours of sulphur, so that it could be transformed into a stable medicine. This elixir was then projected onto base metals, driving off their earthy impurities. It was crucial that the ‘stone’ was stable enough to resist the fire, but volatile enough to penetrate the molten metal and transform its deep structure.
“All Muslims [including the Asharites!!] accept the principle of allegorical interpretation; they only disagree about the extent of its application” (161).
He argues that Ghazali’s condemnation of the philosophers as unbelievers is based on a spurious literalism to which no Muslims consistently adhere:
“Such a charge cannot be definite, because there has never been a consensus against allegorical interpretation. The Qur’an itself indicates that it has inner meanings which it is the special function of the demonstrative class to understand” (162).
There is no way to avoid the use of rational argument in determining the correct reading of scripture—the boundaries between the literal and figurative dimensions are not self-evident.
Granted that philosophers should be the arbiters of the inner meaning of scripture, what if philosophy cannot arrive at certain or “demonstrative” conclusions, but only plausible conclusions? After all, as Averroes notes, Aristotle and Plato disagreed, one arguing for an eternal cosmos, the other for creation from a pre-existing matter (the ‘receptacle’). Indeed, Averroes argues that the view of the Asharites is similar in crucial respects to the view of Plato—they too acknowledge that past time is finite.
So how are we to decide?
Is this a question that human rationality can decide? Modern cosmologists still debate whether the universe is eternal or whether time had a beginning.
“The introduction of the spirit and of the apprehensive and motive faculties into the semen of animals does not proceed from the natures contained in the qualities of heat, cold, moisture and dryness . . . their existence comes from the First One either without any intermediation or through the intermediation of the angels that are appointed over the things that come to be” (252).
“They hold, however, that the principles from which proceed the things that come to be act by necessity and nature, not by way of deliberation and choice, as, for example, the procession of light from the sun” (253).
“In God’s power there are strange and wondrous things, not all of which we have observed. How is it proper that we should deny their possibility or affirm their impossibility?” (254).
The philosophers agree that all active powers derive from God, but they continue (perversely) to hold to the idea of secondary causes, thus limiting God’s freedom and omnipotence.The philosophers agree that all active powers derive from God, but they continue (perversely) to hold to the idea of secondary causes, thus limiting God’s freedom and omnipotence.
“It picks up the properties of all herbs, save only violets, from their flowers and roots, if they are steeped in it for three hours. The effects of this water are universal in the human body, for it quickly and miraculously cures all the cold afflictions . . . ailments of the brain, the nerves and joints” (Alderotti, 248).
•Some speculated that alcohol might be the prime matter of vegetable life—something more basic than the four elements. This seemed to be confirmed by certain experimental phenomena: essential oils of plants which aren’t soluble in water or oil, are soluble in alcohol:
To the Hellenistic polymaths, the physical world was a spectacle of the uncanny. Mysterious and impenetrable, nature seemed too full of wonder for philosophy to comprehend. In the last analysis, thought many, it could be known only by divine revelation (192)
The Roman polymath Pliny (23-79 CE) in his scientific encyclopedia, Natural History, catalogued much of the ancient lore regarding the marvels of nature.

