R13 - Performance Mensurement Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

Steps to performance mensurement (3)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does an effective performance attribution process reflect?

A

100% of the portfolio’s return or risk exposure

This ensures that all aspects of the portfolio’s performance are accounted for.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What aspect of a portfolio manager’s work is included in an effective attribution process?

A

The portfolio manager’s current decision-making process

This helps in understanding how decisions impact performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What type of decisions are accounted for in an effective performance attribution process?

A

Active investment decisions taken by the portfolio manager

These decisions are crucial for analyzing performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An effective performance attribution process provides a full explanation of what?

A

The portfolio’s excess return and risk

This is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of investment strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or False: An effective attribution process can be relied upon for meaningful analysis.

A

False

Attribution that does not account for total risk and return cannot be relied upon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Return attribution

A

Evaluates the impact of the active portifolio managment on overall portifolio return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Risk attribution

A

Active investment decisions on portifolio risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Micro attribution

A

Managers level and intend to verify if pm did what they would and understand drivers portifolio return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Macro attribution

A

Quantifies if the decisions made are align with ssa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the return, holding, transaction based atributions

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

F- Geométric return

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the Brison hood method

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What’s the advancement on Brison Facher Method

A

More popular model
Tips teve difference between interaction effect and the ‘new’ allocation effect is that the delta return is against overall portifolio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Liability based benchmark

A

Usually Focus on cash flow required for pay liabilities.
Used assets include nominal bonds, inflation adj, high quality stocks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe adv/disa of absolute bench

A

Adv
-Easily to compute;
Disa
- Not investable bench

17
Q

Broad market indexes bench adv/disa

A

ADV
- well recognized, Easy to understand, and Widely avaliable
- unambigous
- apropriate if reflects the current inv process of the manager
Disa
- mgt style <> from indexe

18
Q

Style indexes bench adv/disa

A

ADV
-Widely available
- appropriate if reflect managment style
Disa
- overconcetration in certain sec and sectors
- different definitions can produce quite <> bench returns

19
Q

Factor model bench - adv/disa

A

ADV
- can capture insight of factor that produce return
Disa
- not intuitivelly
- no ready avaliable and May be expensive to obtain
-Diferent factor can produce diferent outputs

20
Q

Return based bench adv/disa

A

ADV
- Easy and intuitive
- válid bench
Disa
- style indexes May not reflect managers own
- not applied to managers that change style

21
Q

F- components of portifolio return

A

P=M+S+A
M- market índex
s- style
A- active return
Way to think as a sentence the pm choose style the apropriate índex and try to beat than

22
Q

Apraissal measure objective

A

Assess whether the investment results due to skill or luck

23
Q

F- Treynor ratio

A

Amount of return by systematic risk

24
Q

F- info ratio

A

Amount of return agains bench vs. amount of Tracking risk

25
F- appraisal ratio
Active return for vol residual term Tips Residual term given formula bellow
26
Difference of sortino ratio vs. Sharpe
Sortino ignores ‘good’ vol (positive) by excluding into account.
27
Cumulative drawdown - describe how to calculate
28
Capture ratio explain
Determine the relative performance when market go up or down. When above one in a market that up, the manager performance was better that bench.
29
Sortino Ratio
Only consider the standard deviation of the downside risk. Rt is the target rate return.
30
F-misfit return
Misfit return = normal benchmark - IPS benchmark
31
What's the special atribute to sortino ratio
Assess performance when return distributions are not symmetrical
32
All actual, no fee paying, non discretionary must be included in composite. True or false
False.All actual, fee paying, discretionary must be included in composite.
33
Explain the difference between top down vs. bottow up relative attibutions
1. Top-Down Relative Attribution Approach: Starts at the aggregate (portfolio level) and drills down into sector and security contributions. Focus: Evaluates high-level decisions such as asset allocation and broad investment strategy. Key Components: Asset Allocation Effect: Impact of overweighting or underweighting asset classes or sectors. Selection Effect: Impact of security selection within sectors or asset classes. Interaction Effect (Optional): Measures combined effects of allocation and selection. Use Case: Useful for portfolio managers and CIOs evaluating strategic allocation and sector positioning. 2. Bottom-Up Relative Attribution Approach: Starts at the individual security level and aggregates contributions upward to determine total portfolio attribution. Focus: Evaluates security selection decisions and their contribution to portfolio performance. Key Components: Security Selection Effect: Measures stock-picking skill within each sector or asset class. Sector/Asset Group Aggregation: Aggregates individual security contributions to determine total excess return. Use Case: More relevant for equity analysts and active managers focusing on stock selection. Example: If a manager picks a specific tech stock that significantly outperforms, the Bottom-Up Attribution will allocate the excess return directly to security selection, rather than an overall sector bet.