R7 & R8 - Biz Law Flashcards
(186 cards)
What is required to form an agency relationship?
All you need to form an agency relationship is a principle with consent and capacity.
The agent need not have capacity (could be a minor)
A writing is generally not necessary, unless the agency cannot be performed within one year, or has to do with land (MYLEGS)
What is a power of attorney?
A written authorization of agency (normally limited to specific transactions)
Who is required to sign a POA for it to be enforceable?
Only the principal (agent generally not required to sign)
What are the duties that an agent has to a principal?
LORA
- ) Loyalty (no self-dealing/competing)
- ) Obedience (must obey)
- ) Reasonable Care (don’t be negligent)
- ) Account (don’t commingle principal property with agent property)
What is a tort?
Wrongful act (could be intentional or unintentional)
What is the difference between the “power” to terminate an agency relationship and the “right” to terminate?
Power = technically, everyone has free will and can always walk away
Right = contract in place may not allow you to walk away without breaching
*possible to have the power, but not the right
Is there ever a situation when the principal does not have the right to terminate an agency relationship?
If the agency is coupled with an interest, the principal does not have the power or the right to terminate.
For example, if a principal promises something to an agent, they can’t turn around later and take away the promise.
An agent has the power to contractually bind a principal to 3rd parties. What are the ways an agent can bind a principle?
- ) Actual authority (power & right)
- ) Apparent authority (power only)
- ) Ratification (power only)
What is the difference between implied and expressed authority?
Expressed is in either oral or written form.
Implied usually comes from the nature of the agency relationship. If someone is hired as a business manager (fancy title), they have implied authority of doing everything to run that business
What happens if a principal losses capacity?
The agency relationship is automatically terminated by operation of law
What is apparent authority? Please explain how it differs from actual authority.
Apparent authority is based on the third party’s reasonable belief that the agent has the power to bind the principal.
Actual authority is based on the agents reasonable belief that the agent has the power to bind the principal.
How should a principal protect themselves from a parent using apparent authority to bind them to 3rd parties?
Give notice to 3rd parties of the limitations of the agency relationship
Let’s say a principal fires an agent, what steps does the agent need to take to eliminate apparent authority of the old agent?
- ) Direct notice to old 3rd parties
2. ) Constructive notice to any potential new 3rd parties (newspaper ad, etc)
The third way a principal can be bound to 3rd parties by an agent is called ratification, what is that?
Ratification is when the agent had apparent authority but not actual authority, but the principal is actually fond of the bind to the 3rd party, so they grant actual authority and therefore ratify the apparent authority.
Essentially, it allows a principal to choose to be bound by a previously unauthorized act of his agent.
*in order to ratify, agent must have had apparent authority (not actual)
Can a principal ratify one piece of a bind and not the entire deal?
No, principal must ratify entire transaction
When is a principal liable to 3rd parties?
Only if the agent had actual authority, or if the principal ratifies successfully.
*if agent only had apparent authority, principle would need to ratify in order to be liable
When is an agent liable to 3rd parties?
Only if the agent has an undisclosed principal (partially disclosed or fully undisclosed).
*if the agent had actual authority, does not matter if the principal was disclosed or not - principal is liable
Who is the 3rd party liable to?
Generally, only liable to principal. (even if undisclosed)
Exception for when a principal’s identity was fraudulently concealed, then 3rd party isn’t liable to anyone
Are principal’s generally liable for torts committed by their agents?
In general no.
However, there is an exception for employer/employee relationships. An employer CAN be held liable for torts committed by their employee as long as the tort occurred during the scope of the employment.
This does not relieve the agent from their liability. The damaged person may sue both the employer and employee (agent)
- employers usually not liable for torts committed by independent contractors
- employer is ONLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE, not responsible for intentional torts committed by agents
If an employer has a signed agreement with an employee (agent) to not commit a particular tort, and then the agent commits, is the employer off the hook?
No, an agreement between employer & agent DOES NOT prevent a 3rd party from holding the employer liable
What is the difference between a unilateral contract and a bilateral contract?
Unilateral = 1 promise, 1 performance to fulfill the agreement. A contract is not complete until performance is completed (John will pay Dan $10 if Dan will wash John’s car)
Bilateral = 2 promises (agreement before performance) (John promises to pay Dan $10 if Dan promises to wash John’s car - two way promise)
What are the two different sources of contract law and how are they applied?
- ) Common Law = RISE (real estate, insurance, services, employment)
- ) UCC (uniform commercial code) = Goods (movable things)
What are the elements of a legally enforceable contract?
- ) Agreement
- ) Exchange of consideration (legal value, doesn’t have to be dollars)
- ) No defenses
*does not have to be in writing (MYLEGS)
Does an advertisement meet the definition of an offer?
No, just an invitation seeking an offer.
*an ad does qualify as an offer if a reward is offered (first 30 pple get a free soda)