RCT Flashcards

1
Q

What are RCT used to evaluate?

A

Treatment effectiveness

They inform guidelines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define the components of internal validity of a study

A

A causal relationship between the two variables must be properly demonstrated.

  • Observation
  • Explanation of the observation

Eliminate:

1) Bias - the way you assess the outcome could influence the outcome
2) Confounding - another factor in the trial affects it
3) Chance - could it happen by chance/fluke

If not: hypothesis is correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is external validity?

A

Is it applicable to my patient population? Generalisability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Should you treat? Four considerations

A
  • Benefit worth harm?
  • Resource costs - ?better use of resources
  • Patient preferences
  • Ethics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name three types of intervention studies

A

1) Before and after intervention - assess the group before treatment and after
2) Intervention groups compared to control - assess before and after but compare to non-intervention group
3) RCT - groups allocated at random and compare to control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is regression to the mean?

A

When you observe an extreme value this is partially due to chance. The next observation is likely to be closer to the mean -> can give the appearance of improvement.

Get a control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What issues do ‘before and after studies’ have?

A

Assess a group of pts before and after - bus
bias - expectations things would be better
confounding - disease may get better on its own anyway
chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What issues to intervention and control studies have?

A

They compare effectiveness with the control group which is good! but…
bias - pt or researcher beliefs can affect outcome measure
confounding - differences between the start groups?, were they treated differently?
chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define double-blinded

A

Participants and assessors do not know what group they’re in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is randomisation?

A

Use chance allocation - any differences are allocated by chance.
Confounders are distributed by chance (both known and unknown)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What outcome measures are used in RCTs?

A

Clinical effectiveness - cure/recovery

Patient experience - QoL, pain score

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the ethical considerations for RCTs?

A

Are pts being disadvantaged by being in the control or the intervention group?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is clinical equipoise?

A

If you think one treatment is better (placebo or intervention) you cannot ethically randomise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the choices for control?

A

Usual care
Placebo
Nothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is contamination in an RCT (crossover)?

A

Pts randomised to the control may accidentally receive the intervention or visa versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can contamination be managed in an RCT?

A

1) Analyse according to treatment received (but this causes allocation bias
2) Analyse according to intention to treat - preferred but may underestimate effect
Difficult in information studies
Can reduce by cluster randomisation

17
Q

What is relative risk, how do you calculate it?

A

probability of the event in the treatment arm/probability of event in the control arm

18
Q

What does a relative risk of 0.88 mean?

A

The risk is less in the treatment arm. The intervention reduces the risk of the measured outcome by 12%

19
Q

How do you calculate the probability of an event in the treatment arm?

A

events/total number of people in treatment arm

20
Q

How do you calculate absolute risk (risk difference)?

A

probability of an event in the treatment arm - probability of event in the control group

21
Q

What does an absolute risk (difference) of -0.017 mean?

A

You are 1.7% less likely to die (experience outcome) on the intervention

22
Q

What does a number needed to treat of 41 mean?

A

Treating 41 people would save 1 person from outcome

23
Q

How do you calculate NNT?

A

1/absolute risk (ignore the negative sign)

24
Q

What causes bias in assessing outcome?

A

pt, researcher and analysts expectations - ideally blind them
Can conceal allocation

25
Q

When are losses to follow up an issue?

A

If treatment allocation (to intervention) and outcomes cause drop out - everyone who gets treatment dies!

26
Q

When might you need a large sample size?

A

Measured effect is small - need a large sample size
Measured imprecisely
Consider the significance level