Real Propery Flashcards
Buyer purchasers land and takes out a $400,000 mortgage with a bank. After 3 years, the buyer partitions off and sells the land to a neighbor. After 2 years, the buyer sells the remaining land to an investor who takes subject to the mortgage. The bank never receives any further payments. Who can the bank sue?
Buyer only. Bank may foreclose and hold buyer personally liable. Cannot sue the neighbor or investor. Subject to the mortgage the grantee is not liable. If silent, then it is subject to the mortgage.
If one assumes the mortgage, then grantee is liable.
Investor purchases land from owner for $40,000 by general warranty deed. Later the investor finds another person with a claim of adverse possession. Investor sues owner to recover damages. What result?
Investor. Breach of covenant of warranty. Grantor agrees to defend grantee against claims of title by third parties.
Investor purchases land from owner for $40,000 by general warranty deed. Later the investor finds another person with a claim of adverse possession. Investor sues owner to recover damages for a breach of covenant against encumbrances. What result?
Owner. Covenants against encumbrances are against the title and expire at closing. (easements, mortgages, liens).
B and A enter into installment land sale contract in which B will make 100 monthly payments and as part of the agreement that A will promise to convey good and marketable title to B when all the payments are made. After making 12, B learns there is an outstanding mortgage and seeks to rescission. A sues B for breach by not paying. Result.
A, because he had until closing to cure the defect. Installment land contract, the vendor’s duty is to present marketable title at the time of the last payment.
Bank forecloses on property of rancher. At the foreclosure sale, property is sold to a bidder, who took below the market price. After the sale, the rancher comes into a large amount of money and seeks to reacquire the property. What is the rancher’s best argument?
Statutory right of redemption (after foreclosure). Redemption nullifies the foreclosure sale.
B owed land and sought to borrow $40,000 from a bank and B executed a promissory note that was secured by a mortgage on the land. B also executed a warranty deed, in absolute form, to be held by escrow agent. Escrow agreement stated that if B defaults, escrow agent will deliver deed to bank. B defaults, but seeks to re-acquire property prior to a foreclosure sell. Result?
Judgement for B, because escrow agreement and deed absolute should not preclude right to redeem. Mortgagee cannot disguise a mortgage to avoid equitable right of redemption.
Once a mortgage always a mortgage.
Father wills a house to daughter and remaining estate to son. Father dies with $100,000 mortgage on house. Daughter uses money from the father’s estate to pay off the mortgage. Son objects and files suit to prevent daughter from interference with expectancy interest. Result?
Son has no interest, daughter is entitled to take money from estate to paid off mortgage because she is specifically devised in the will (exoneration)
Modern trend may treat son as creditor to cover value of money taken from father’s estate.
A mortgage contains a prepayment clause that says mortgagee is entitled to increase the interest rate and collect 20% on the unpaid balance. Is the clause enforceable?
Yes enforceable. Prepayment clauses are not an lawful restraint against alienation or does not clog the equity of redemption.
There is an uncertain boundary between two pieces of land. One owner asked the other to construct a fence. Both parties agreed to the location of the line. Adverse possession is 15 years. Both parties sell the land after 15 years and the new owners discover the fence was positioned incorrectly. How should court rule?
Fence line controls, because both parties agreed to the fence line. Adverse possession does not matter.
Seller contracted to sell a building to a buyer for $10,000 to close on 10-18. The day before, the seller was injured and unable to attend closing. On 10-24, the seller recovers and seeks to close, but buyer refuses to pay or accept the deed. Seller seeks specific performance. Who prevails?
Seller, because time is not ordinarily of the essence in a real property sales contract. If late party tenders performance within reasonable time, and nonbreaching refuses to perform, then specific performance is available.
Buyer and seller enter into contract regarding a commercial building. The buyer gives a $125,000 deposit and the remainder at closing. Prior to closing, the city rezones the land as residential. Buyer refuses to honor contract and seller seeks specific performance on grounds of equitable conversion. If judgment is for the buyer, it is because?
Seller would be unjustly enriched. Doctrine of equitable conversion shifts risk of loss to buyer, who is the equitable owner of the land. Legal title remains with owner. Not granted when intervening forces would make it unduly harsh on one party.
After a buyer and seller sign a written agreement to transfer land, who bears the risk if the property is destroyed before closing?
Buyer under equitable conversion doctrine. Seller retains legal title.
After a buyer and seller sign a written agreement to transfer land, who is entitled to possession until closing?
Seller. Seller has legal title and possession follows legal title.
After a buyer and seller sign a written agreement to transfer land, the property is destroyed before closing. The seller has causally insurance. Does the buyer have to pay the full contract price?
No, seller must credit insurance proceeds against purchase price in contract. Buyer is the owner of the equitable title and bears the risk.
After a buyer and seller sign a written agreement to transfer land, and the seller dies before closing. Can the buyer demand title at closing from seller’s heirs?
Yes. Doctrine of equitable conversion, seller’s interest is personal property. At death, the legal title passes to heirs but they must transfer to buyer at closing.
After a buyer and seller sign a written agreement to transfer land, and the buyer dies before closing. Can the buyer’s heirs demand conveyance at closing from seller?
Yes. Buyer’s interest passes as real property.
A buyer and seller have a written contract for the sale of land. At closing, buyer discovers that seller has an outstanding mortgage. Seller intends to use proceed of sale to satisfy mortgage. Does this convey marketable title to the buyer?
Yes. Seller has right to satisfy mortgage or lien at closing with the proceeds of the sale.
After closing, is the seller still liable on an implied covenant of marketability?
No. Once closing occurs, the deed transfers hands and seller is no longer liable on implied covenant of marketability.
In a deed there is a description of the property and is signed by grantor. The name of grantee is blank. Is deed valid?
Yes, courts presume person taking delivery has authority to fill in name of grantee.
What is required for a valid inter vivos gift?
1) donative intent
2) delivery
3) acceptance
An owner of land handed an agent a deed conveying the land to his niece and said give it to my niece. The niece was in Africa. Agent recorded deed. Owner died and will transferred land to daughter. In suit to quiet title, if the court rules in favor of the niece it is because?
Delivery of the deed was effective when handled to the agent. Grantor’s intention to make a deed presently effective even though delivery is postponed.
An owner of land handed an agent a deed conveying the land to his niece and with written instructions to give it to my niece upon payment of $50,000. Is parol evidence admissible to show that delivery is conditional?
Yes. Different results if grantor gives the deed directly to grantee.
Owner of land executes deed to son and keeps deed in desk. Owner dies and will specifically devises land to daughter. In an action to quiet title will the son prevail?
No. Grantor executed a deed but failed to delivery during lifetime and no title passes.
An owner of land handed an agent a deed conveying the land to his niece and with written instructions to give it to my niece upon payment of $50,000. Can the owner revoke?
Yes, if the condition is not met and there is no enforceable written contract to convey.