Realist Theories of Crime Flashcards
(46 cards)
REALIST THEORIES
Realists argue that crime is a real problem to be tackled
Realism arose in the 1970s and 80s in the UK and USA as a reaction to significant rises in the crime rate, especially in street crime, burglary and assault
The official crime statistics should be taken seriously because they reflect patterns of crime and the ‘typical criminal’
We should work with governments to come up with practical solutions to crime
Victims centered approach - victims and the public fear of crime are at the centre of theory and policy ideas
Left wing:
Generally linked to Labour party concepts
‘Tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime’
Recognise importance of street crime, white-collar crime and global crime
Blame social injustices, inequalities and relationships between the police, wider society and offenders
Solutions focus on structural changes to tackle social causes of crime
Right wing:
Generally linked to Conservative party concepts
being ‘tougher on the criminals than the causes’
Focus almost exclusively on street crime
Blame the individual offenders
Solutions focus on controlling people (offenders)
Right Realism - Crime is the product of three factors:
Biological differences
Inadequate Socialisation
Individual’s ‘Rational Choice’ to offend
right realism is associated with
Associated with the shift to the right in politics in the 1970s: the right wing neoliberal government of Margaret Thatcher which came to power in 1979 and republican presidency of Ronald Reagan in the USA, starting in 1981
Right Realists reject the Marxist idea that economic or structural factors such as poverty and inequality are the root cause of crime
BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES
Wilson & Herrnstein (1985) put forward a bio-social theory about criminality arguing that crime is caused by a mixture of biological and social factors.
Biological differences make some people more predisposed to committing crime than others. For example, certain hormones and personality traits can lead to increased aggression, impulsivity and risk taking.
Herrnstein and Murray (1994) - argue that one of the main causes of crime is low intelligence levels which are biologically determined.
They attempted to use IQ tests to demonstrate a correlation between lower intelligence and criminality, arguing low IQ is linked with race, class and criminality.
However this evidence has been discredited
INADEQUATE SOCIALISATION
Effective socialisation (from the nuclear family) reduces the risk of criminality, as it ensures transference of norms, values, right and wrong and self control.
Children who are socialised inadequately as a child have more risk of becoming offenders. Murray (1990) argues that crime is increasing because of a growing underclass who are failing to socialise their children properly.
New Right Murray: inadequte socalisation
Led to welfare dependency, causing decline of marriage and growth of lone parent families as well as men not having to take responsibility for their family by working
Murray argues that lone parent families are not adequate socialisers, especially if the man is absent from the child’s life – boys lack a role model and paternal discipline.
They turn to other, often delinquent, role models on the street and gain status through crime
Critisicm of Murrays Inadequate Socilisaion
Tham (1998)’s study found the crime rate increased more in Britain than Sweden, even though welfare provision is greater in Sweden
RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY
A theory that states everyone has free will and the power of reason.
Clarke (1980) argues the decision to commit crime is due to a choice based on a rational calculation of the likely consequences. If it is perceived the rewards outweigh the costs, then someone may turn to crime.
Right realists argue that in society, perceived costs of committing crime are low there is little risk of being caught and punishments are lenient anyway, even if they are.
This is why they thought the crime rate had increased through the 1970s.
Routine activity Theory - Felson (2002)
For a crime to occur there must be three things:
1. Absence of a ‘capable guardian’
2. Motivated offender
3. Suitable target
Offender acts rationally: the presence of a guardian is likely to deter a criminal
EVALUATIONS OF RIGHT REALISM: STRENGTHS
Continues to heavily influence political thinking and policy making in the UK and USA today.
It recognises the importance of community control and community responses.
EVALUATIONS OF RIGHT REALISM: LIMITATIONS
Ignores wider structural causes such as poverty.
It overstates offenders rationality and how far they make cost-benefit calculations before commiting a crime – it may explain utilitarian crime but not violent crimes.
It views criminals as free choosing, which contradicts its claim behaivour is determined by biology and socialisatiion.
Lily et al (2003) state low IQ only accounts for 3% of crimes.
Does not pay attention to white collar or corporate crime.
Right Realist - Two Types of Strategy
Situational Crime Prevention
Environmental Crime Prevention
Situational Crime Prevention
Concerned with making it harder to commit a crime by changing the situation e.g. improving lighting
Environmental Crime Prevention
Concerned with improving the physical environment e.g. cleaning up graffiti
SITUATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION (SCP)
These strategies are based on the theory that most crimes are opportunistic and based on the offender making a rational choice to commit a crime.
The best known example is ‘target hardening’ – making people/buildings/objects a less attractive, ‘easy’, soft target.
exmaples of target hardening
CCTV
Security guards
Home Survellance
Open plan spaces
Alarm systems
Access control
CASE STUDY for SCP
Marcus Felson (1998) The Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York City was poorly designed and provided plentiful deviant opportunities.
E.g. the toilets were used for luggage thefts, drug dealing, rough sleeping etc.
A redesign of the physical environment greatly reduced these activities e.g. large sinks where the homeless would bathe were replaced by small hand basins, toilet cubicles were made bigger so luggage could be taken in
The idea was to ‘design crime out’
SCP Birmingham
Poyner and Webb (1997) used a field experiment and discovered that there was a high rate of theft in the Bullring centre in Birmingham and that thefts occurred in 2 markets which were densely packed. They redesigned the markets and crime fell by 70%.
EVALUATION (AO3) OF SITUATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION
1.Displacement
Critics of this strategy argue that it does not stop crime from happening, but just moves it from one area to another (they displace it). For example, placing CCTV in a shop may stop crime in that shop, but the offender may just go to a different shop instead (a softer target).
It is not dealing with the root cause of why that offender wants to commit a crime in the first place.
E.G Chaiken et al (1974) found that a crackdown on subway-robberies in NY only lead to crime above the surface
- It assumes that ‘rational choice’ is the main cause of crime and ignores other possible causes. What other causes are there? Think about other perspectives…
- Focusses on petty street crime and ignores white-collar crime/corporate crime/state crime which are arguably more costly and harmful - why is this a problem?
- Assumes criminals always act rationally but that doesn’t work for violent crimes and crimes committed under influence of drugs
- Ignores the root causes of crime, such as poverty/unemployment/inequality/racism etc - means it difficult to create long term strategies for crime prevention (links to displacement)
ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME PREVENTION (ECP)
Wilson and Kelling (1982) and their ‘broken windows’ thesis.
They use the analogy of ‘broken windows’ to stand for various signs of disorder in some neighbourhoods. E.g. graffiti, begging, littering, vandalism, excessive noise, prostitution, drunkenness
If there’re broken windows (or graffiti, vandalism etc) that is not repaired then it tells society that no one cares that this is happening.
These neighbourhoods have a lack of formal social control (police presence) as police turn a blind eye to petty nuisance behaviour
They also lack informal social control (the community) as people feels intimidated and powerless to challenge it
The situation will deteriorate tippling the neighbourhood into a spiral of decline where crime increases as it is deemed ‘okay’ here.
Respectable residents move out (if they can) and the area becomes a magnet for deviants.
Applying Right Realism: Broken Windows theory
A Home affairs committee looked into the causes of the London riots and concluded that the single most important reason the riots spread was because media spread the idea that police were unable to control the area.
Wilson & Kelling’s solution is to crack down on any disorder using a 2-part strategy:
**1. Environmental Improvement strategy **
Anything damaged in the environment must be repaired immediately without delay. E.g. broken windows, abandoned cars, otherwise more will follow and the neighbourhood will be on the slide
2. Zero Tolerance Policing strategy
Instead of merely reacting to crime, police must take a proactive approach and tackle the slightest hint of disorder, even if not criminal. This prevents serious crime taking root.