Reasoning and Evidence Flashcards
(65 cards)
Propositions
Statements that are true or false
Non-Propositions
Sentences that do not make a claim that can be true or false
Simple-Propositions
Propositions that have no internal logical structure, meaning they are true or false on their own
Complex-Propositions
Propositions that have internal logical structure, meaning they are composed of simple propositions
Premise Indicators
The reasons in an argument
Because, For, Given that, As, Since, As Indicated
Conclusion Indicators
The main claim in an argument.
Therefore, So, It Follows that, Thus, We may conclude that, As a result
What is the common anatomy of arguments?
All arguments are composed of premises and conclusions.
For example, in the argument “Ana is a good candidate because she has relevant experience,” “she has relevant experience” is the premise, and “Ana is a good candidate” is the conclusion.
What is the definition of premise?
The reasons in an argument.
A premise is a proposition that supports a conclusion.
Deductive arguments
(logical structure)
Valid and Sound or unsound
or
Invalid = unsound
Logical Structure
Sound
Unsound
Sound = Good structure and truth
Unsound = is an argument that either is invalid or has at least one false premise.
Inductive Argument
(Assumptive Structure)
Strong, Weak, Cogent, Uncogent
Assumptive
Cogent Argument
Strong and has true premises.
Fallacie
An argument that contains bad reasoning.
Formal Fallacie
(Deductive Reasoning)
Are bad because of their structure. (Deductive reasoning)
Mathematical arguments, logical arguments, arguments from definition
Informal Fallacie
(Inductive reasoning)
Are bad because of their content. (Inductive reasoning)
Analogies, authority, casual inferences, scientific reasoning, extrapolations, etc.
Inference to the best explanation
or
abduction
Arguments where the best available explanation is chosen as the correct explanation.
Can you easily identify bias and sort out facts? What are your guiding questions?
It can be difficult to identify bias and sort out facts at first. To help with this, guiding questions might be, Who wrote this? What website published this? What kind of sources did the writer use? Who funded this?
Can you name a source that calls out when they make mistakes?
A source that calls out when they make mistakes might be local newspapers when they print about past misprints.
How often do you search for sources of funding? Why is that important?
It is important to search for sources of funding because if it is a biased source, like a commercial business, the goal of the post is likely influenced by that and is therefore biased as well.
What are some key phrases that should spark your distrust?
Some key phrases that should spark distrust might be “You won’t hear this anywhere else,” “You can’t trust other sources,” and so on.
What are the implications of and dangers around fake news in general or when viewing a favorite social media site?
Some dangers of fake news might include influencing how people vote. Some implications of fake news might include believing false information and perpetuating it to others.
What was new or a helpful reminder around sources of information?
Some reminders might be to check who hosted the article, check who wrote the article, and look at other parts of the host website.
context collapse,
Danah Boyd came up with this concept
Context collapse means everything on the internet, and particularly on social media, seems to be taking place in [my context] [right now]. However, it could be from years ago or a different state.