Receivership Flashcards
(351 cards)
What is the role of a receiver in a debtor’s financial situation?
A receiver is a person appointed to take possession of a debtor’s assets, acting in a fiduciary capacity. The receiver’s role includes securing property and, in some cases, selling it for the benefit of the creditor(s). When the receiver is granted the power to operate the business, they are known as a “receiver-manager” or “receiver-administrator” and can manage the property during restructuring.
Why are receivers typically appointed in a debtor’s financial affairs?
Receivers are appointed due to lender dissatisfaction with the debtor’s financial performance, which can result from issues like operating losses, insufficient asset coverage for loans, or under-capitalization. A breakdown in communication between the debtor and lender can also lead to receiver appointments.
What sequence of events typically leads to the appointment of a receiver?
The sequence leading to a receiver’s appointment involves a corporation conducting business, borrowing money from a lender, and pledging property as security for the debt. If the debtor defaults on its obligations and fails to rectify the default or reach an agreement with the lender, the lender may issue notices demanding repayment and the intention to appoint a receiver. If the debtor doesn’t meet the repayment deadline, a receiver is appointed to take possession of and realize the secured property for the lender’s benefit.
What is the primary purpose of appointing a receiver in a debtor’s financial situation?
The primary purpose of appointing a receiver is to take possession of the property pledged as security and realize its value to satisfy the debt owed to the secured creditor, subject to any prior ranking claims, deemed trusts, and statutory liens.
What are the two primary methods by which a receiver may be appointed?
A receiver may be appointed either privately, as stipulated in a security agreement, or by order of the court, in accordance with legislation or a rule of law allowing such appointments.
In what situations may a court appoint a receiver, and for what purposes?
A court may appoint a receiver for various purposes, including:
- Administering property that is the subject of a dispute, to preserve and protect it during litigation.
- Administering property or a business to prevent oppressive or prejudicial exercise of powers.
- Administering property or a business of a deceased or incapacitated person.
- Taking possession of and administering property for the benefit of creditors in cases of disputes, conflicts among security agreements, or within legal proceedings, such as foreclosure.
How is the term “receiver” defined in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA)?
In the BIA, a “receiver” is defined as a person appointed either by the court, pursuant to a court order under s. 243 of the BIA, by a court order under federal or provincial law, or under a security instrument. This receiver takes possession or control of all or substantially all of the inventory, accounts receivable, or other property of an insolvent person or a bankrupt related to a business carried on by the insolvent person or bankrupt.
Under s. 243 of the BIA, who can be appointed to act as a receiver, and what term is often used to refer to receivers appointed by court order under this section?
According to s. 243 of the BIA, only a trustee may be appointed to act as a receiver, whether court-appointed or privately appointed. Receivers appointed by court order under s. 243 of the BIA are often referred to as “national receivers” because their powers extend over property in each province and territory.
How did the 2009 amendments to the BIA impact the appointment of receivers in Quebec, and what provisions in Quebec law are relevant to the appointment of receivers?
The 2009 amendments to the BIA made it possible to appoint a receiver in Quebec by a court order issued under the BIA, the CBCA (Canada Business Corporations Act), or the Quebec Business Corporations Act. Additionally, provisions in the CBCA and the Quebec Business Corporations Act also provide for the appointment of a receiver. Agents privately appointed by secured creditors in Quebec often qualify as receivers within the meaning of the BIA.
What is the role of an interim receiver under the BIA, and when is an interim receiver typically appointed?
An interim receiver, as appointed under the BIA, serves to protect the estate of a debtor and the interests of a creditor or creditors during specific periods. They are appointed either between the filing of an application for a bankruptcy order and before the bankruptcy order is made or within the context of a proposal or a notice of intention to make a proposal. An interim receiver may also be appointed when a secured creditor has sent, or is about to send, a notice of their intention to appoint a receiver.
What is a judicial receiver, and in what circumstances might one be appointed?
A judicial receiver may be appointed by a court, particularly in the province of Quebec, in situations involving litigation between two parties or two secured creditors related to a specific property or asset. The primary purpose of appointing a judicial receiver is to preserve and safeguard assets while legal proceedings are ongoing, with the goal of protecting the property until the litigation’s outcome. Unlike other receivers, a judicial receiver does not typically handle the realization or sale of assets. It’s essential to note that, despite the title, a judicial receiver may not necessarily align with the traditional understanding of a receiver, although they could fulfill that role as defined in section 243 of the BIA.
Who can be appointed as a receiver under the BIA, and what are the conditions for such an appointment?
According to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), only a trustee can be appointed as a receiver within the meaning of the BIA, as defined in section 243. However, it’s important to note that a person may be appointed as a receiver without necessarily fitting the BIA’s definition of a receiver. Several conditions must be met for such an appointment, including the insolvency of the debtor and the property subject to receivership consisting of all or substantially all of the debtor’s property used in its business. If these conditions are not met, the BIA does not apply.
Why is the debtor’s cooperation important in a receivership engagement?
The debtor’s cooperation is crucial in a receivership engagement because it allows for tasks like locating inventory, updating accounting information, identifying potential purchasers, and collecting accounts receivable. This cooperation reduces the risk of litigation and helps secure creditors achieve a better recovery.
How does debtor cooperation impact the outcome for secured creditors?
Debtor cooperation positively impacts secured creditors by optimizing results, which is more important than merely maximizing value. This optimization is measured by the difference between the gross realizable value of encumbered property and realization costs, leading to better recovery for secured creditors.
Who are the third parties related to the debtor and why might they cooperate with the receiver?
Third parties related to the debtor can include shareholders, directors, or other stakeholders who may have granted personal guarantees on loans. They have an interest in helping the receiver optimize the secured creditor’s net recovery and may cooperate to protect their interests.
Why is reviewing the debtor’s business before appointing a receiver preferable?
Reviewing the debtor’s business before appointing a receiver can help the debtor understand why restructuring may not be an option, potentially reducing the risk of litigation and improving cooperation. It also allows the secured creditor and receiver to gain valuable knowledge about the debtor’s business for better decision-making during realization.
What is one of the principal objectives of the BIA, and why is it important for insolvency professionals to be aware of it?
One of the principal objectives of the BIA is to promote the restructuring or reorganization of insolvent companies. Insolvency professionals should be aware of this objective to explore alternatives to receivership, as restructuring may be a viable option that could lead to the satisfaction of all parties involved.
What are forbearance agreements in the context of financial arrangements?
Forbearance agreements are negotiated between parties in a financial arrangement to allow for the continuation of existing terms or modifications as needed. Typically, lenders request borrowers to have their operations monitored by an insolvency professional for a specified period. The professional provides regular reports to both the borrower and lender to assess if agreed-upon targets, such as specific revenue or sales goals, are being met.
Are restructuring and receivership mutually exclusive concepts?
Restructuring and receivership are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Receivership can be a tool to achieve the restructuring of a business or ensure its continuation in a different corporate framework. Restructuring primarily focuses on the economic activity of the business rather than the legal entity, allowing for more effective financial recovery.
Is receivership an alternative to bankruptcy?
Receivership is not an alternative to bankruptcy, and they can coexist. Receivership is used by secured creditors to realize specific property encumbered by security to repay secured loans. Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a remedy for the benefit of all creditors, allowing for equitable distribution of the debtor’s property, investigations of financial affairs, and the realignment of priorities as per the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Unsecured creditors typically use bankruptcy proceedings when the debtor commits an act of bankruptcy.
Can bankruptcy and receivership occur simultaneously or alternatively?
Yes, bankruptcy and receivership can occur simultaneously or alternatively. The decision to use one or both procedures is strategic and depends on factors such as cost considerations, the desire to utilize the trustee’s investigative powers, the possibility of benefiting from specific remedies, and the potential for a change in the order of priorities among creditors due to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) provisions.
What is the concept of a dual mandate in insolvency proceedings?
A dual mandate refers to a situation where an insolvency professional serves in both the capacity of a receiver and as a trustee in a bankruptcy. Depending on which engagement begins first, there are specific requirements and limitations. Section 13.4 of the BIA mandates that before accepting a receiver assignment, the trustee must obtain a legal opinion confirming the validity of the secured creditor’s security interest from a lawyer not representing the secured creditor. Section 13.3 of the BIA states that a receiver acting for a debtor’s property cannot accept the position as trustee in a bankruptcy for the same debtor without disclosing the potential conflict of interest. CAIRP’s Rules of Professional Conduct also require full disclosure and consent to avoid impairing professional judgment or objectivity.
What risks do insolvency professionals face during a receivership?
Insolvency professionals conducting receiverships encounter several risks:
- Risk of litigation if the receivership plan falls short.
- Potential blame from creditors, debtors, or lenders afterward.
- Hindsight criticism for not choosing a better alternative.
- Litigation risk exists in any process.
Insolvency professionals can reduce these risks by:
- Thoroughly exploring restructuring alternatives.
- Carefully analyzing and documenting their decisions.
- Adhering to Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP) Rules of Professional Conduct, especially Rules 1 and 2.
- Maintaining professionalism and independence.
- Upholding transparency and ethical standards to minimize blame or litigation risk.