Reg 8 Flashcards
(240 cards)
Which of the following events will release a noncompensated surety from liability to the creditor?
a.
The principal debtor was involuntarily petitioned into bankruptcy.
b.
The creditor was adjudicated incompetent after the debt arose.
c.
The creditor failed to notify the surety of a partial surrender of the principal debtor’s collateral.
d.
The principal debtor exerted duress to obtain the surety agreement.
Choice “c” is correct. A noncompensated surety will be discharged from liability if the principal debtor and the creditor modify the terms of the contract in any way. A partial surrender of the debtor’s collateral is a modification that will release a noncompensated surety from liability
Which of the following statements is(are) correct regarding debtors' rights? I. State exemption statutes prevent all of a debtor's personal property from being sold to pay a federal tax lien. II. Federal social security benefits received by a debtor are exempt from garnishment by creditors. a. I only. b. Neither I nor II. c. II only. d. Both I and II.
Choice “c” is correct. Federal law does not allow creditors to institute garnishment proceedings with respect to federal social security benefits.
Choice “a” is incorrect. Federal law, nor state law, controls what property is subject to federal tax liens.
Choice “d” is incorrect. Federal law, not state law, controls what property is subject to federal tax liens, and federal law does not allow creditors to institute garnishment proceedings with respect to federal social security benefits.
Choice “b” is incorrect. Federal law does not allow creditors to institute garnishment proceedings with respect to federal social security benefits, and federal law, nor state law, controls what property is subject to federal tax liens.
Which of the following acts always will result in the total release of a compensated surety?
a.
The principal debtor’s performance is tendered.
b.
The principal debtor’s obligation is partially released.
c.
The creditor extends the principal debtor’s time to pay.
d.
The creditor changes the manner of the principal debtor’s payment.
Choice “a” is correct. Tender of performance by the principal debtor completely releases the surety, even a compensated surety.
Choice “d” is incorrect. Changing the manner of payment will release a compensated surety only if the change increases the surety’s risk.
Choice “c” is incorrect. Changing the time of payment will release a compensated surety only if the change increases the surety’s risk.
Choice “b” is incorrect. Partially releasing the principal will only partially release the compensated surety.
When a principal debtor defaults and a surety pays the creditor the entire obligation, which of the following remedies gives the surety the best method of collecting from the debtor? a. Subrogation. b. Attachment. c. Exoneration. d. Contribution.
Choice “a” is correct. Subrogation is the right a surety has by which the surety succeeds to the creditor’s rights against the principal when the surety pays the principal’s obligations.
Choice “c” is incorrect. Exoneration is the right a surety has against the debtor to force the solvent debtor to pay a debt when the debtor refuses to do so.
Choice “d” is incorrect. Contribution is a right one surety has against the surety’s co-sureties to force them to pay their share of the debt.
Choice “b” is incorrect. Attachment is not a right of suretyship, but rather is a remedy with respect to the property of the debtor-principal.
Green was unable to repay a loan from State Bank when due. State refused to renew the loan unless Green provided an acceptable surety. Green asked Royal, a friend, to act as surety on the loan. To induce Royal to agree to become a surety, Green fraudulently represented Green’s financial condition and promised Royal discounts on merchandise sold at Green’s store. Royal agreed to act as surety and the loan was renewed. Later, Green’s obligation to State was discharged in Green’s bankruptcy. State wants to hold Royal liable. Royal may avoid liability:
a.
Because the arrangement was void at the inception.
b.
If Royal was an uncompensated surety.
c.
If Royal can show that State was aware of the fraudulent representations.
d.
Because the discharge in bankruptcy will prevent Royal from having a right of reimbursement.
Choice “c” is correct. Fraud on the surety by the principal debtor is not a defense unless the creditor knew of the fraud.
Choice “b” is incorrect. An uncompensated surety can be bound as long as the surety’s promise is made before consideration passed between the principal debtor and the creditor. Here, State renewed the loan in exchange for obtaining the surety. Thus, there is sufficient consideration to bind Royal.
Choice “d” is incorrect. Discharge in bankruptcy of the principal debtor does not discharge the surety.
Choice “a” is incorrect. Nothing in the facts makes the arrangement here void at the inception.
Wright cosigned King’s loan from Ace Bank. Which of the following events would release Wright from the obligation to pay the loan?
a.
King is adjudicated mentally incompetent.
b.
Ace is paid in full by King’s spouse.
c.
Ace seeking payment of the loan only from Wright.
d.
King is granted a discharge in bankruptcy.
Choice “b” is correct. Assuming that this is a suretyship situation and that Wright’s only obligation is as a surety, full payment of the underlying obligation discharges the surety.
Choice “c” is incorrect. Because nothing in the facts states that Wright signed only as a guarantor or guarantor of collection, Ace had no duty to first seek payment from King; so, Ace’s failure to first seek payment from King does not result in Wright’s discharge.
Choice “d” is incorrect. Discharge of the principal debtor for bankruptcy does not discharge a cosigner of a loan.
Choice “a” is incorrect. Incompetency of the principal debtor does not discharge a cosigner of a loan.
Under the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which of the following would a collection service using improper debt collection practices be subject to?
a.
Criminal prosecution for violating the Act.
b.
Abolishment of the debt.
c.
Civil lawsuit for damages for violating the Act.
d.
Reduction of the debt.
Choice “c” is correct. The FDCPA gives parties injured by unfair collection practices the right to sue for damages. 15 USC 1692k(a)(1)
Choice “b” is incorrect. The FDCPA gives parties injured by unfair collection practices the right to sue for damages. It does not provide for abolishment of the debt.
Choice “d” is incorrect. The FDCPA gives parties injured by unfair collection practices the right to sue for damages. It does not provide for a reduction of the debt.
Choice “a” is incorrect. The FDCPA gives parties injured by unfair collection practices the right to sue for damages. It does not provide criminal penalties.
Ingot Corp. lent Flange $50,000. At Ingot’s request, Flange entered into an agreement with Quill and West for them to act as compensated co-sureties on the loan in the amount of $100,000 each. Ingot released West without Quill’s or Flange’s consent, and Flange later defaulted on the loan. Which of the following statements is correct?
a.
Quill will be liable for the entire loan balance.
b.
Flange will be released for 50% of the loan balance.
c.
Quill will be liable for 50% of the loan balance.
d.
Ingot’s release of West will have no effect on Flange’s and Quill’s liability to Ingot.
Choice “c” is correct. Release of a co-surety is treated the same as release of security. The release discharges the other co-sureties to the extent of the impairment of their rights. Had West not been released, Quill would have had a right of contribution against West for half of the debt. Thus, Quill is discharged to that extent.
Which of the following methods will allow a creditor to collect money from a debtor's wages? a. Arrest. b. Writ of garnishment. c. Mechanic's lien. d. Order of receivership.
Choice “b” is correct. A writ of garnishment will allow a creditor to collect money from a debtor’s wages.
Choices “a” and “d” are incorrect. Neither the arrest of the debtor nor an order of receivership will allow a creditor to collect money from a debtor’s wages.
Choice “c” is incorrect. A mechanic’s lien is placed on property such as an automobile and will prevent the owner from transferring “clean” title without paying the mechanic’s lien. A mechanic’s lien does not, by itself, allow the creditor to collect money from a debtor’s wages.
A party contracts to guarantee the collection of the debts of another. As a result of the guaranty, which of the following statements is correct?
a.
The creditor may proceed against the guarantor without attempting to collect from the debtor.
b.
The guaranty must be in writing.
c.
The creditor must be notified of the debtor’s default by the guarantor.
d.
The guarantor may use any defenses available to the debtor.
Choice “b” is correct. The Statute of Frauds requires promises to pay the debts of another to be evidenced by a writing containing the material terms.
Choice “a” is incorrect. Before seeking payment from a guarantor of collection, a creditor must first attempt to collect from the principal debtor.
Choice “d” is incorrect. The guarantor may use some, but not all, of the debtor’s defenses. For example, the debtor’s minority or bankruptcy is not a defense to the guarantor.
Choice “c” is incorrect. A surety generally has no right to be notified of the debtor’s default.
Which of the following events will release a noncompensated surety from liability?
a.
Insanity of the principal debtor at the time the contract was entered into with the creditor.
b.
Filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy against the principal debtor.
c.
Modification by the principal debtor and creditor of their contract that materially increases the surety’s risk of loss.
d.
Release of the principal debtor’s obligation by the creditor but with the reservation of the creditor’s rights against the surety.
Choice “c” is correct. Any variation on an uncompensated surety’s risk releases the surety.
Choice “d” is incorrect. If the release includes a reservation of rights against the surety, the surety is not discharged.
Choice “b” is incorrect. The fact that the principal debtor is bankrupt is not a defense to the surety.
Choice “a” is incorrect. The fact that the principal debtor was incompetent at the time the contract was made is not a defense available to the surety.
Nash, Owen, and Polk are co-sureties with maximum liabilities of $40,000, $60,000 and $80,000, respectively. The amount of the loan on which they have agreed to act as co-sureties is $180,000. The debtor defaulted at a time when the loan balance was $180,000. Nash paid the lender $36,000 in full settlement of all claims against Nash, Owen, and Polk. The total amount that Nash may recover from Owen and Polk is: a. $0 b. $24,000 c. $140,000 d. $28,000
Choice “d” is correct. A co-surety has a right of contribution from co-sureties. Where the debt has been reduced, each co-surety remains liable for the lesser of: (i) the reduced amount of debt or (ii) the original amount for which the co-surety has agreed to be responsible. However, the right of contribution allows each co-surety to recover from the other co-sureties their pro rata share of the payment. Here, Nash satisfied the debt by paying $36,000. Proportionally, Nash was liable for 40/180 (or 2/9) of the original debt, Owen was responsible for 3/9, and Polk was responsible for 4/9. Nash’s pro rata share of the $36,000 is $8,000; Owen’s share is $12,000; and Polk’s share is $16,000. Thus, Nash may recover $28,000.
The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prohibits a debt collector from engaging in unfair practices. Under the Act, a debt collector generally can be prevented from:
a.
Communicating with a debtor who is represented by an attorney.
b.
Contacting a third party to ascertain a debtor’s location.
c.
Commencing a lawsuit to collect a debt.
d.
Continuing to collect a debt.
Choice “a” is correct. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prohibits contacting the debtor directly if an attorney represents the debtor.
Choice “b” is incorrect because a collection agency can contact a third party to discover a debtor’s whereabouts.
Choice “d” is incorrect because the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is designed to curb abuses in the collection process. The Act is not designed to eliminate the debt.
Choice “c” is incorrect because all creditors have the right to sue debtors to collect debts.
Which of the following bonds are an obligation of a surety? a. Municipal bonds. b. Debenture bonds. c. Convertible bonds. d. Official bonds.
Choice “d” is correct. An official bond is a type of surety bond. Many states require public officials to obtain bonds from a surety for faithful performance of their duties. Such bonds obligate a surety for all losses that the public official causes by negligence or nonperformance of required duties.
Choice “c” is incorrect. A convertible bond is a corporate bond that may be converted into stock. A convertible bond has nothing to do with the obligations of a surety.
Choice “b” is incorrect. A debenture bond is simply an unsecured corporate bond. A debenture bond has nothing to do with the obligations of a surety.
Choice “a” is incorrect. A municipal bond is a bond issued by a city or other local government. A municipal bond has nothing to do with the obligations of a surety.
Sorus and Ace have agreed, in writing, to act as guarantors of collection on a debt owed by Pepper to Towns, Inc. The debt is evidenced by a promissory note. If Pepper defaults, Towns will be entitled to recover from Sorus and Ace unless:
a.
Sorus and Ace are in the process of exercising their rights against Pepper.
b.
Towns has not attempted to enforce the promissory note against Pepper.
c.
Sorus and Ace prove that Pepper was insolvent at the time the note was signed.
d.
Pepper dies before the note is due.
Choice “b” is correct. Sorus and Ace have agreed to be guarantors of collection. Thus, Towns, the creditor, must pursue the debtor, Pepper, before Towns is entitled to recover from Sorus and/or Ace.
Choice “a” is incorrect. Towns, the creditor, will be entitled to recover from Sorus and Ace, the sureties, even if the sureties are in the process of exercising their rights against the debtor (i.e., “right of exoneration”).
Choice “c” is incorrect. Insolvency of the debtor, either at the time the note was signed, or at the time of default, is not a defense of a surety.
Choice “d” is incorrect. Death of the debtor is not a defense of a surety.
Edwards Corp. lent Lark $200,000. At Edwards’ request, Lark entered into an agreement with Owen and Ward for them to act as compensated co-sureties on the loan in the amount of $200,000 each. If Edwards releases Ward without Owen’s or Lark’s consent, and Lark later defaults, which of the following statements is correct?
a.
Owen will be liable for 50% of the loan balance.
b.
Edwards’ release of Ward will have no effect on Lark’s and Owen’s liability to Edwards.
c.
Owen will be liable for the entire loan balance.
d.
Lark will be released for 50% of the loan balance.
Choice “a” is correct. Owen will be liable for 50% of the loan balance. The release of one co-surety (Ward) without the consent of the other co-surety (Owen) discharges the remaining co-surety’s (Owen) right of contribution from the released co-surety (Ward) and discharges the remaining co-surety to the extent the released party was liable. Owen and Ward were equally liable on the debt. Thus, Ward’s release will release Owen from 50% of Owen’s liability.
Mane Bank lent Eller $120,000 and received securities valued at $30,000 as collateral. At Mane's request, Salem and Rey agreed to act as uncompensated co-sureties on the loan. The agreement provided that Salem's and Rey's maximum liability would be $120,000 each. Mane released Rey without Salem's consent. Eller later defaulted when the collateral held by Mane was worthless and the loan balance was $90,000. Salem's maximum liability is: a. $45,000 b. $90,000 c. $30,000 d. $60,000
Choice “a” is correct. $45,000.
A release of a co-surety without the other co-surety’s consent and without “reservation of rights” against the other co-surety results in the remaining co-surety’s losing the right of contribution against the released co-surety. Thus, the remaining surety is discharged to the extent that the remaining surety could have recovered from the released surety. Here the sureties were liable for the debt equally. Thus, Salem is now liable for only $45,000, which is half of the $90,000 debt.
On June 1, Year 1, Decker orally guaranteed the payment of a $5,000 note Decker’s cousin owed Baker. Decker’s agreement with Baker provided that Decker’s guaranty would terminate in 18 months. On June 3, Year 2, Baker wrote Decker confirming Decker’s guaranty. Decker did not object to the confirmation. On August 23, Year 2, Decker’s cousin defaulted on the note and Baker demanded that Decker honor the guaranty. Decker refused. Which of the following statements is correct?
a.
Decker is liable under the oral guaranty because Baker demanded payment within one year of the date the guaranty was given.
b.
Decker is not liable under the oral guaranty because it expired more than one year after June 1.
c.
Decker is liable under the oral guaranty because Decker did not object to Baker’s June 3 letter.
d.
Decker is not liable under the oral guaranty because Decker’s promise was not in writing.
Choice “d” is correct. Under the Statute of Frauds a promise to pay the debt or default of another (a “surety” contract) must be evidenced by a writing signed by the surety (the party to be charged). Decker orally guaranteed the debt owed by Decker’s cousin. Thus, Decker’s promise is not enforceable. Baker’s confirmation is irrelevant.
A distinction between a surety and a co-surety is that only a co-surety is entitled to: a. Exoneration. b. Subrogation. c. Reimbursement (Indemnification). d. Contribution.
Choice “d” is correct. Only a co-surety has the right of contribution against other co-sureties. Contribution results in the sharing of liability on a pro-rata basis among co-sureties.
Choice “c” is incorrect, because reimbursement or indemnification is the right of both a surety and co-sureties to be repaid by the debtor for the surety’s or co-sureties’ payment to the creditor.
Choice “b” is incorrect, because subrogation is the right of both a surety and of the co-sureties, which have paid the creditor, to “stand in the shoes of the creditor” and sue the debtor for payment.
Choice “a” is incorrect, because exoneration is both: (i) the right of a surety (and the right of co-sureties) to bring an action against a debtor who has assets but has failed to pay the creditor and (ii) the right of a co-surety to bring a lawsuit to require the other co-sureties to pay their pro-rata share of the principal’s debt.
Which of the following defenses would a surety be able to assert successfully to limit the surety’s liability to a creditor?
a.
The incapacity of the surety.
b.
A personal defense the principal debtor has against the creditor.
c.
A discharge in bankruptcy of the principal debtor.
d.
The incapacity of the principal debtor.
Choice “a” is correct. A surety may raise his or her own contract defenses to limit his or her liability; thus, the surety’s own incapacity is a defense to the surety promise.
Choice “c” is incorrect. The debtor’s discharge in bankruptcy is not available as a defense to the surety. A debtor’s possibility of going bankrupt is one of the main reasons that creditors require sureties.
Choice “b” is incorrect. A surety generally cannot raise the debtor’s personal defenses against the creditor.
Choice “d” is incorrect. A surety cannot raise the debtor’s incapacity as a defense against the creditor. A debtor’s infancy or mental incapacity is one of the main reasons why a creditor might require a surety.
First State Bank lent Debbie Nepsy $50,000 to purchase securities. Debbie agreed to repay the loan in 20 monthly installments of $2,500. Debbie stopped making payments after paying her first two installments. The bank then began phoning Debbie at all hours of the day and night, asking her to repay the loan, calling her a dead beat, and threatening to have her thrown in jail. Debbie explained that the securities she purchased are now worthless, so she will not repay the loan, and she told the bank to stop calling her. Nevertheless, the bank continued calling. The bank's actions are in violation of: a. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. b. The Clayton Act. c. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934. d. None of the answer choices are correct.
Choice “d” is correct. As will be explained below, the bank’s actions do not appear to violate any of the Acts listed in choices “c”, “a”, or “b”.
Choice “c” is incorrect. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regulates many aspects of securities after they are issued but does not apply to the bank’s collection activities here because it does not appear that the bank was involved in the sale of the securities beyond making the loan to Debbie.
Choice “a” is incorrect. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prohibits debt collection agencies from conducting such activities with respect to consumer debts, but the Act does not apply to a creditor attempting to collect its own debts.
Choice “b” is incorrect. The Clayton Act is applicable to antitrust matters in business, not to collection activities.
Carlos asked Rick and Peter to guarantee Carlos' debt to Gord Motors. Both Rick and Peter agree to act as sureties. The contract that all parties signed provides that Rick's maximum liability is $30,000, and Peter's is $20,000. Carlos owes Gord Motors $20,000 and is in default. Rick pays Gord Motors the entire amount. In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, Rick can recover from Peter: a. $20,000. b. Nothing. c. $12,000. d. $8,000.
Choice “d” is correct. As a general rule each surety is liable to the creditor for the entire amount of the debt. However, with respect to co-sureties, each co-surety can seek contribution from the other co-surety (or co-sureties) to the extent any co-surety pays more than his/her/its pro rata share of the debt. In this case Rick’s pro rata share of the debt is $30,000/($30,000 + $20,000) = 3/5. 3/5 x $20,000 = $12,000. Peter’s pro rata share is $20,000/($30,000 + $20,000) = 2/5. 2/5 x $20,000 = $8,000. Peter owes Rick $8,000 in contribution.
Lee repairs high-speed looms for Sew Corp., a clothing manufacturer. Which of the following circumstances best indicates that Lee is an employee of Sew and not an independent contractor?
a.
Lee is paid weekly by Sew.
b.
Lee’s work is not supervised by Sew personnel.
c.
Lee’s tools are owned by Lee.
d.
Lee’s work requires a high degree of technical skill.
Choice “a” is correct. A clear example of an employee is one who works full time for the employer, uses the employer’s tools, is compensated on a time basis, and is subject to supervision of the employer in the details of the work. A clear example of an independent contractor is one who has a calling of his own, who uses his own tools, is hired for a particular job, is paid a given amount for the job, and follows his own discretion. Thus, payment on a weekly basis is an indication that a person is an employee rather than an independent contractor.
Blue, a used car dealer, appointed Gage as an agent to sell Blue's cars. Gage was authorized by Blue to appoint subagents to assist in the sale of the cars. Vond was appointed as a sub-agent. To whom does Vond owe a fiduciary duty? a. Blue only. b. Gage only. c. Neither Blue nor Gage. d. Both Blue and Gage.
Choice “d” is correct. A subagent is one who assists the agent in the performance of his or her duties. When a subagent is appointed by an agent with authority to appoint a subagent, the subagent owes a duty to both the agent and the principal. Thus, choices “b”, “a”, and “c” are incorrect.