REG 8 Flashcards
(167 cards)
A shareholder’s basis in the stock of an S corporation is increased by the shareholder’s pro rata share of income from
Tax-exempt interest
Taxable interest
Income for an S corporation includes taxable and tax-exempt interest. All income of an S corporation is passed through to the shareholder and results in an increase in the shareholder’s basis in the stock of the corporation. The shareholder is responsible for any taxes that may or may not apply to the S corporation’s income.
L Corporation, an S electing corporation, pays single coverage health insurance premiums of $4,000 per year and family coverage premiums of $7,000 per year (the $7,000 includes single and family coverage). SH owns 10 percent of L stock and L pays SH’s family coverage under the health insurance plan. What amount of insurance premium is included in SH’s gross income?
The entire premium payment must be included in income since SH owns 2% or more of the L’s stock. If SH owned less than 2% of the stock, the entire premium payment could be excluded from income..
Carson owned 40% of the outstanding stock of a C corporation. During a tax year, the corporation reported $400,000 in taxable income and distributed a total of $70,000 in cash dividends to its shareholders. Carson accurately reported $28,000 in gross income on Carson’s individual tax return. If the corporation had been an S corporation and the distributions to the owners had been proportionate, how much income would Carson have reported on Carson’s individual return?
The distributive share to Carson would be $400,000 × 40% = $160,000.
Bern Corp., an S corporation, had an ordinary loss of $36,500 for the year ended December 31, 2014. At January 1, 2014, Meyer owned 50% of Bern’s stock. Meyer held the stock for 40 days in 2014 before selling the entire 50% interest to an unrelated third party. Meyer’s basis for the stock was $10,000. Meyer was a full-time employee of Bern until the stock was sold. Meyer’s share of Bern’s 2014 loss was
Meyer’s share of Bern Corp.’s 2014 loss should be Meyer’s pro rata share of the corporation’s income.
Since Meyer owned 50 percent of Bern Corp. for the first 40 days of Bern Corp.’s tax year, Meyer’s portion of the loss would be $2,000 (= 50 percent ownership* (40 days/365 days) * $36,500 ordinary loss). Meyer’s share of the corporation’s loss is dependent on his/her ownership percentage, It is unaffected by Meyer’s being an employee of the corporation.
Absent an election to close the books, the allocation of nonseparately stated income or loss for an S corporation shareholder that changed his ownership interest during the year is computed based on which of the following ownership percentages?
A. Ownership percentage at the end of the S corporation year.
B. Ownership percentage computed on a per-share per-day basis.
C. Ownership percentage at the beginning of the S corporation year.
D. Ownership percentage determined as an average of the beginning and ending ownership percentages.
The ownership percentage that a partner has for a given day of the tax year is multiplied by the income allocated to that day to determine allocations.
As of January 1, 2014, Kane owned all the 100 issued shares of Manning Corp., a calendar year S corporation. On the 40th day of 2014, Kane sold 25 of the Manning shares to Rodgers. For the year ended December 31, 2014 (a 365-day calendar year), Manning had $73,000 in nonseparately stated income and made no distributions to its shareholders.
What amount of nonseparately stated income from Manning should be reported on Kane’s 2014 tax return?
The amount of the nonseparately stated income from Manning Corp. that should be reported on Kane’s 2014 tax return should be Kane’s pro rata share of the corporation’s income.
Since Kane owned 100 percent of Manning and sold a 25 percent share on the 40th day of Manning’s tax year, Kane’s portion of the income would be calculated with respect to 100 percent ownership for the first 40 days of the corporation’s tax year and 75 percent ownership for the remainder of the tax year.
Kane’s share of Manning’s income from the first 40 days of the corporation’s tax year would be $8,000 = 100 percent ownership × (40 days/365 days) × $73,000 in income. Kane’s share of the corporation’s income for the remainder of the year would be $48,750 = 75 percent ownership × (325 days/365 days) × $73,000 in income).
Hence, the amount of the nonseparately stated income from Manning Corp. that should be reported on Kane’s 2014 tax return is $56,750 ? the sum of $8,000 from the first 40 days and $48,750 from the remainder of the tax year.
Beck Corp. has been a calendar year S corporation since its inception on January 2, 2006. On January 1, 2014, Lazur and Lyle each owned 50% of the Beck stock, in which their respective tax bases were $12,000 and $9,000. For the year ended December 31, 2014, Beck had $81,000 in ordinary business income and $10,000 in tax-exempt income. Beck made a $51,000 cash distribution to each shareholder on December 31, 2014. What was Lazur’s tax basis in Beck after the distribution?
$6,500 is correct. His/her portion of income items of the corporation that are separately computed and passed through to shareholder, including tax-exempt income, increases the stock basis of each S corporation shareholder. Basis is calculated as follows:
Beginning Basis $12,000 Plus 50% profits 40.500(81,000x50%) Plus 50% exempt 5,000(10,000x50%) Less distributions (51,000) Ending Basis $ 6,500
Prail Corporation is a C corporation that on February 1, 2014 elected to be taxed as a calendar-year S corporation. On June 15, 2014, Prail sold land with a basis of $100,000 for $200,000 cash. The fair market value of the land on February 1, 2014 was $150,000. Prail had no other income or loss for the year and no carryovers from prior years.
What is Prail’s tax?
A C corporation that makes an S election and has unrealized built-in gains in its assets as of the election day must pay a built-in gains tax on this appreciation if it is recognized within the next 10 years.
When Prail makes the S election it has appreciation in the land of $50,000 ($150,000 - $100,000). Since the land was sold within 10 years of the election day, the first $50,000 of gain is taxed to the corporation at the rate of 35%.
Therefore, Prail must pay a tax of $17,500 ($50,000 * 35%).
A sole proprietorship incorporated on January 1 and elected S corporation status. The owner contributed the following assets to the S corporation:
Basis Fair market value Machinery $ 7,000 $ 8,000 Building 11,000 100,000 Cash 1,000 1,000
Two years later, the corporation sold the machinery for $4,000 and the building for $110,000. The machinery had accumulated depreciation of $2,000, and the building had accumulated depreciation of $1,000. What is the built-in gain recognized on the sale?
The built in gains tax applies only when an existing C corporation makes an S corporation election. The built in gains tax does not apply when a sole proprietorship makes an S election, so the correct answer is $0.
If an S corporation has no accumulated earnings and profits, the amount distributed to a shareholder
A. Must be returned to the S corporation.
B. Increases the shareholder’s basis for the stock.
C. Decreases the shareholder’s basis for the stock.
D. Has no effect on the shareholder’s basis for the stock.
A distribution from an S corporation that has no accumulated earnings and profits reduces the basis of a shareholder’s stock. If the payment exceeds the shareholder’s basis in the stock, it is viewed as a payment in exchange for stock.
Baker, an individual, owned 100% of Alpha, an S corporation. At the beginning of the year, Baker’s basis in Alpha Corp. was $25,000. Alpha realized ordinary income during the year in the amount of $1,000 and a long-term capital loss in the amount of $3,000 for this year. Alpha distributed $30,000 in cash to Baker during the year.
What amount of the $30,000 cash distribution is taxable to Baker?
Calculate basis in an S corporation as follows: The current basis of $25,000 is increased by the $1,000 of income to $26,000, then reduced for the distribution of $30,000 which would reduce the basis to $0 and produce a $4,000 gain. The $3,000 loss is suspended until there is more basis in the future.
If the amount of the distribution exceeds the adjusted basis of the stock, such excess shall be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of property.
Sandy is the sole shareholder of Swallow, an S corporation. Sandy’s adjusted basis in Swallow stock is $60,000 at the beginning of the year. During the year, Swallow reports the following income items:
Ordinary income $30,000
Tax-exempt income 5,000
Capital gains 10,000
In addition, Swallow makes a nontaxable distribution to Sandy of $20,000 during the year. What is Sandy’s adjusted basis in the Swallow stock at the end of the year?
An S corporation shareholder increases her basis in the S corporation stock by her share of the corporation’s income (taxable and non-taxable) and expenses (deductible and non-deductible). Distributions also reduce the stock basis. Sandy’s basis is reduced to $40,000 for the distribution ($60,000 - $20,000) and is increased for all three income items for an ending basis of $85,000 ($40,000 + $30,000 + $5,000 + $10,000).
On July 1, 2014, Vega made a transfer by gift in an amount sufficient to require the filing of a gift tax return. Vega was still alive in 2014.
If Vega did not request an extension of time for filing the 2014 gift tax return, the due date for filing was
A. March 15, 2015.
B. April 15, 2015.
C. June 15, 2015.
D. June 30, 2015.
Individual taxpayers making gifts that are not fully excludable due to the $14,000 annual exclusion for each gift are required to file a gift tax return, Form 709, by the April 15th of the year following the year the gifts were given by the donor. The required filing date differs, if the donor died during the year that the gifts were made.
When Jim and Nina became engaged in April 2014, Jim gave Nina a ring that had a fair market value of $50,000. After their wedding in July 2014, Jim gave Nina $75,000 in cash so that Nina could have her own bank account. Both Jim and Nina are U.S. citizens.
What was the amount of Jim’s 2014 marital deduction?
For gift tax purposes, a taxpayer may claim a marital deduction for all gifts given to a spouse provided: 1) the taxpayer and the spouse were married at the date of the gift; 2) the spouse is a U.S. citizen; and 3) the property transferred is not a terminable interest.
As Jim and Nina were not married when Jim gave Nina the engagement ring, Jim may not claim the marital deduction for the fair market value of the ring. However, Jim and Nina were married when Jim gave Nina $75,000 in cash so that Nina could have her own bank account. Therefore, Jim may claim a marital deduction of $75,000, attributable to the cash gift.
In 2014, Sayers, who is single, gave an outright gift of $50,000 to a friend, Johnson, who needed the money to pay medical expenses.
In filing the 2014 gift tax return, Sayers was entitled to a maximum exclusion of
Gift donors may exclude the first $14,000 of gifts made to each donee for each calendar year from the donor’s taxable gifts. Married couples are allowed to elect to treat the gift as made one-half by each spouse.
Sayers is a single taxpayer and, as such, may only exclude the first $14,000 of any gift to a donee. The fact that the gift was to pay medical expenses is irrelevant. Thus, Sayers may exclude $14,000 of the $50,000 gift.
The answer to each of the following questions would be relevant in determining whether a tuition payment made on behalf of another individual is excludible for gift tax purposes, EXCEPT:
A. Was the tuition payment made for tuition or for other expenses?
B. Was the qualifying educational organization located in a foreign country?
C. Was the tuition payment made directly to the educational organization?
D. Was the tuition payment made for a family member?
Tuition payments can potentially be excluded from the gift tax if made for any individual. The exclusion is not limited to just family members so this information is not relevant.
During the current year, Mann, an unmarried U.S. citizen, made a $5,000 cash gift to an only child and also paid $25,000 in tuition expenses directly to a grandchild’s university on the grandchild’s behalf. Mann made no other lifetime transfers. Assume that the gift tax annual exclusion is $14,000. For gift tax purposes, what was Mann’s taxable gift?
Mann can give up to $14,000 to any individual and pay no gift tax since the annual exclusion for the given year is $14,000. There is an unlimited exclusion from the gift tax for education gifts as long as the gift is made directly to the educational institution, as is the case here. Therefore, the $25,000 gift is also not subject to the gift tax.
Under the unified rate schedule,
A. Lifetime taxable gifts are taxed on a noncumulative basis.
B. Transfers at death are taxed on a noncumulative basis.
C. Lifetime taxable gifts and transfers at death are taxed on a cumulative basis.
D. The gift tax rates are 5% higher than the estate tax rates.
Under the unified rate schedule, lifetime taxable gifts and transfers at death are taxed on a cumulative basis through reducing the amount of the unified credit by the sum of all amounts credited in preceding periods.
Which of the following payments would require the donor to file a gift tax return?
A.
$30,000 to a university for a spouse’s tuition.
B.
$40,000 to a university for a cousin’s room and board.
C.
$50,000 to a hospital for a parent’s medical expenses.
D.
$80,000 to a physician for a friend’s surgery.
There is an unlimited exclusion for education gifts if the tuition is paid directly to the educational institution. However, this exclusion is limited to tuition and does not apply to room and board. For 2014, $14,000 of the gifts to the cousin can be excluded from the gift tax, so the remaining $26,000 is subject to the gift tax. A gift tax return must be filed to reflect this transaction.
George and Suzanne have been married for 40 years. Suzanne inherited $1,000,000 from her mother. Assume that the annual gift-tax exclusion is $14,000. What amount of the $1,000,000 can Suzanne give to George without incurring a gift-tax liability?
An unlimited exclusion from the gift tax applies for gifts to spouses. Therefore, Suzanne can give the entire $1,000,000 to George and pay no gift tax.
Jan, an unmarried individual, gave the following outright gifts in 2014:
Donee Amount Use by Donee
Jones $15,000 Down payment on house
Craig 14,000 College tuition
Kande 5,000 Vacation trip
Jan’s 2014 exclusions for gift tax purposes should total
For gift tax purposes, donors may exclude the first $14,000 of gifts to each donee for each calendar year from the amount of taxable gifts.
Hence, Jan could exclude $14,000 of her $15,000 gift to Jones and, similarly, $14,000 of her $14,000 gift to Craig. Jan could exclude her entire $5,000 gift to Kande because the gift was less than $14,000. Therefore, Jan’s 2014 exclusions for gift tax purposes should total $33,000.
This response is, therefore, correct.
Bell, a cash basis calendar year taxpayer, died on June 1, 2014. In 2014, prior to her death, Bell incurred $2,000 in medical expenses. The executor of the estate paid the medical expenses, which were a claim against the estate, on July 1, 2014.
If the executor files the appropriate waiver, the medical expenses are deductible on
A. The estate tax return.
B. Bell’s final income tax return.
C. The estate income tax return.
D. The executor’s income tax return.
A decedent’s medical expenses paid by the decedent’s estate are deductible on the decedent’s tax return in the year incurred if:
1) the expenses were paid within a year of the decedent’s death;
2) the expenses are not deducted for federal estate tax purposes; and
3) a waiver stating that no estate tax deduction for the expenses was taken by the estate and that the estate waives its right to the deduction.
Bell’s estate paid the medical expenses a month after Bell’s death, easily within a year. In addition, the appropriate waiver was filed. Thus, assuming that the estate not deducted the expenses for federal estate tax purposes, the medical expenses may be deducted on Bell’s final income tax return.
H and W are married citizens. All of their real and personal property is owned as tenants by the entirety or as joint tenants with right of survivorship. The gross estate of the first spouse to die:
A. Includes only the property acquired by the deceased spouse.
B. Is governed by federal tax provisions rather than community property laws.
C. Includes one third of all real estate as the dower right of the first spouse to die.
D. Includes half of the value of all the property owned regardless of which spouse furnished the original consideration.
For married individuals, half of the value of jointly owned property is always included in the estate of the first spouse to die.
Ordinary and necessary administration expenses of an estate are deductible:
A. Only on the fiduciary income tax return.
B. Only on the estate tax return.
C. On the fiduciary income tax return if the estate tax deduction is waived.
D. On both the fiduciary income tax return and the estate tax return.
Ordinary and necessary administration expenses of an estate are deductible on the fiduciary income tax return if the administrator of the estate waives the deduction on the estate tax return.