Relations between branches Flashcards
when was the supreme court established?
2005 constitutional reform act
was first opened in 2009.
what is the supreme court?
serves as the final court of appeal in the UK
what was the aim of the establishment of the supreme court?
increase the independence of the judiciary from the government- previously the highest court of appeal in the UK was the law lords who were senior judges and also members of the HoL
what was the role of the Lord Chancellor?
a government position was also amended by the Act. Previously, the Lord Chancellor was a cabinet minister (justice secretary), but also the head of the judiciary responsible for appointing judges. This second role was removed from the Lord Chancellor in __2005
what does the supreme court do?
It hears appeals on points of law and matters of legal and constitutional importance. It can make decisions relating to whether government institutions have acted within their powers, including devolved bodies, and can use judicial review to assess whether the government has acted in accordance with existing law.
Gina Miller case?
An example of a case heard by the Supreme Court was in 2016-17, when Gina Miller, a businesswoman, argued that the Prime Minister did not have the right to trigger Article 50 (the formal notice of Britain’s exit from the EU) without the consultation of Parliament. The Court found in Miller’s favour, and Parliament voted to trigger Article 50 in 2017.
Magistrates?
deals with criminal cases mostly
County?
deals with civil cases (eg. landlord/tenant disputes)
Crown?
deals with more serious criminal cases
High Court?
deals with more complicated civil cases (e.g. adoption, large compensation claims)
Court of Appeal?
hears appeals from civil and criminal cases
Supreme?
hears appeals from Court of Appeal
European Court of Justice?
hears cases involving EU laws which may have been broken
European Court of Human Rights?
deals specifically with human rights issues
how many members is the supreme court made of?
12, cases are usually heard by 5-9 judges (always odd so majority verdict can be reached)
How are appointments to the Supreme Court made?
Appointments to the Supreme Court are made by an independent selection commission, who recommend a candidate who is then approved or rejected by the Lord Chancellor, who cannot indefinitely reject candidates.
what is judicial neutrality?
refers to the absence of any form of partisanship or politically biased judgements- a refusal to ‘take sides’ in cases.
How far is judicial neutrality upheld?
In reality, it is impossible to be politically ‘neutral’- so judges must not let their views and beliefs affect their professional behaviour. In the Supreme Court, judges cannot sit in cases involving an associate or family member, and must avoid open political activity.
what is the demographic background of Supreme Court judges?
Due to their narrow background (white, male, privately-educated) judges have been argued to have a conservative bias, and possibly a bias against women, ethnic minorities and poorer people, as they are less likely to consider their needs and empathise with them. I
what did Lady Hale point out in 2015?
In 2015, Lady Hale (the only female judge) pointed out that since her appointment, 13 judges had been appointed, who were all male, all white, all bar two privately educated, and all bar two Oxbridge-educated
what is judicial activism?
there has been a rise in judicial activism, especially relating to human rights and civil liberties case, where judges openly criticise the actions of government.
what is judicial independance?
this is the principle that the actions and decisions of judges should not be influenced by pressure from other branches of government.
How is judicial independence upheld?
Judges are chosen by an independent commission, and only ‘signed off’ by the Lord Chancellor
Once appointed, judges can’t be sacked unless they break the law, so they can’t be threatened with removal for making the ‘wrong’ decision
Judges’ pay is decided by an independent pay review body, without interference from ministers
The Supreme Court is physically separate from the government and legislature (unlike the previous Law Lords)
Criticisms to the extent the supreme court is judicially independent of political pressure?
Concerns were raised by Lord Phillips in __2011 __about the possible effects of spending cuts on the court system as part of wider ‘austerity’ policies. In addition, the court was heavily criticised by some ministers (backed up by the right-wing press) following the ruling that Article 50 must be triggered by Parliament and not the government, possibly putting pressure on future decisions of the court. However, it remains to be seen whether public criticism of judge’s decisions will have much of an effect.