Relationships Flashcards
Evolutionary explanations of parented preferences-
Darwin (1871)-
Sexual selection- selection of those characteristics that aid successful reproduction rather than for survival.
Evolutionary explanations of parented preferences-
Trivers (1972)-
Female reproduction requires greater investment, males have a grater opportunity to find another successful mate. So females need to be more careful when choosing a partner
Evolutionary explanations of parented preferences-
Fisher (1930)-
‘Sexy sons hypothesis’- the females offspring will inherit the things they found sexy about their father
Evolutionary explanations of parented preferences-
Clarke and Hatfield (1989)-
Students were asked to approach the opposite gender and ask if they ‘will go to bed either them tonight?’.
75% male students agreed, no female students agreed.
Evolutionary explanations of parented preferences-
Buss and Schmidt (2016)-
Males and females adopt similar mating strategies when looking for long term relationships.
Evolutionary explanations of parented preferences-
David Buss (1989)-
Surveyed 10,000 adults, across 33 countries, found females put more importance on characteristics that signal thief ability to provide resources. Males preferred women who were younger and more attractive.
Evolutionary-
Buss and Schmitt?
Both sexes adopt similar strategies when looking for long term relationships, both choosy
Evolutionary-
Bereczkei
Social changes limit consequences, due to things like birth control. So must not be the only explanation.
Attraction- self disclosure-
Altman and taylor
Social penetration theory
Attraction- self disclosure-
Reis and schaver?
Stated there needed to be a reciprocal element to self disclosure
Attraction- PA-
Shackelford and Larsen
Suggested that genetic fitness was defined by symmetrical faces
Attraction- PA-
Walster
At a dance, peoples attractiveness was rated (secretly), filled in questionaries, they were told this was a computer pairing, but it was in fact random.
This did not support the matching hypothesis as a 5 was happy with a 10. Showing they did not take their own attractiveness in to account.
Attraction- PA-
Berscheid
Pps bought tickets to a dance, attractiveness was assessed by four judges, completed a questionnaire about important factors in a relationship, they then chose their partner from a line up.
PA was deemed as the most important factor, they chose someone who matched themselves in the judges ratings.
Attraction- PA-
Dion
Physically attractive people were rated as more kind, strong, sociable, and successful compared to unattractive people.
Attraction- FT-
Kerschoff and Davis
Created the filter theory
Theories- SET-
Thibault and Kelley
Created the social exchange theory
Theories- SET-
Duck (1994)
CL alt will adapt based on the state of our current relationship
Theories- ET-
Walster (1978)
Profit in a relationship should be be similar
Theories- ET-
Walster (1978)
Partners rewards and costs in a relationship should be about the same
Theories- ET-
Utne (1984)
Survey on 118 recently married couples, ages 16-45, together for two or more years.
People who reported their relationship as more satisfied deemed their relationship as more equitable,
Theories- ET-
Berg and McQuinn (1986)
Equity did not increase over time, which would be predicted by the theory. Equity did not change between a relationship that would’ve end and one that would succeed.
Theories- ET-
Aumer-Ryan (2006)
Couples form individualistic cultures considered their relationship to be most satisfying when the relationship was equitable.
Couples from collectivist cultures more satisfied when they were over benefitting.
Theories- ET-
Huseman (1987)
Some partners are ‘benevolent’- happy to put more into the relationship than they receive.
‘Entitleds’ this is when people believe they deserve more rewards than they give into tthe relationship
Theories- RSM-
Rusbult (2001)
Created the Rusbults investment model