Religion and Beliefs Flashcards
(37 cards)
What did Durkheim say about religion?
Belief is based on totemism, all religions involve ceremony and rituals which bind people and society together (social solidarity) , collective conscience (shared norms and values) , function remains even if religion fades out
What did Marx say about religion?
Religion ‘a haven of a heartless world’ numbs suffering of poor, justification for inequality, should and will disappear (agrees with secular view)
What did feminists say about religion?
Religious ideology legitimates oppression and subordination of women (patriarchal) ‘marginalised’
What did Armstrong,Holm and woodhead say about the evidence for patriarchy?
Armstrong, Religious orgs: sees exclusion as evidence of marginalisation e.g. Catholicism forbids women to become priests
Holm, places of worship: often segregate sexes , ‘devaluation of women’
Sacred texts: largely feature male gods
Woodhead, religious laws and customs: may give women fewer rights such as dress code
What did El Saadawi, Woodhead and Gilliant ray say about it being the culture, not the religion?
El saadawi = undermines women, male dominated countries use religion to justify inequality e.g. Saudi Arabia and hijab
Woodhead = while many religious institutions are patriarchal, women can express freedom + self respect through faith
Gilliant Ray = found many British Muslims see hijab as sign of oppression but may also see it as liberating.
What do postmodernists say about religion?
And what did Giddens say about what this has caused?
Claim that traditional theories cannot explain religion today, beliefs vary, people in a postmodern society choose what best suits them, described as a diy cocktail/spiritual supermarket, religion more personalised, growth in new age movements result of this, GIDDENS = large amount in choice of beliefs available has caused rise in fundamentalism.
What do postmodernists Giddens, Baumann, Lyotard and Bruce say about religion?
Giddens = fundamentalism is quite new, grown because it provides rigid and simple truth in a changing world
Baumann = like Giddens sees fundamentalism as response to living in postmodernity as new religions emerge and it brings freedom choice Lyotard = some embrace new religions, some attracted to fundamentalism
Bruce = sees fundamentalism as being confined to monotheistic religions
What do Neo-Marxists Althusser, Marx and Gramsci believe about religion?
Althusser and Marx called it the ‘ideological state apparatus’ as it gives belief system that keeps people oppressed
Gramsci = believed in the ‘dual character of religion’ e.g. one side is a ‘hegemony’ (overall dominance) and the other is that it could also serve needs of the poor (good and bad side)
What is the Neo-Marxists liberation theory and which sociologists explain it?
Maduro = social movement that emerged from Catholic Church, particularly in SA, which believed that the church and its leaders had a responsibility to defend rights of poor
Casanova = argues although gone, values still hold
What are the reasons for secularisation and what sociologists stated each reason?
Weber = Rationalisation, people believing less in supernatural and development in science and tech > disenchantment since 16th century
Bruce = society has ‘technological worldview’ which replaces religious beliefs e.g. NHS
Parsons = Structural differentiation, religion was a huge institution that dominated pre-industrial society e.g. created laws and customs but in industrial society found other ways to deal with this eg. Government, charities
What are the other reasons for secularisation and the sociologists that stated them?
Wilson = Decline of small communities, pre industrial society made of SC with shared values, religion etc.
Bruce = Industrialisation, diversity in religion
Berger = Religious diversity, no longer single religion everyone follows
What does Lyotard, Davie and Hervieu-leger say about being against secularisation?
(New forms of religion)
Lyotard = society has moved to a postmodern state where traditional views no longer work > driven by globalisation, metanarrarives no longer apply.
Davie = Obligation > consumption, ppl no longer obliged to go to church, Believing without belonging e.g. e-church , Vicarious religion is increasing (practiced by active minority)
Hervieu-leger, Spiritual shopping, More personal choice due to cultural amnesia, 2 groups emerging: pilgrims (follow individual path) and converts (offer strong sense of belonging)
What did Lyon, Berger and Heelas and Woodhead say about being against secularisation?
Lyon = agrees with Davie, religious diversity, pick n mix, consumerism of religion, globalisation etc.
Berger = no monopoly of religions
Heelas+Woodhead = ‘Spiritual revolution’, new age beliefs and practices emphasise personal development > increased interest in spirituality, study of Cumbria found evangelical churches successful because they emphasise importance of spiritual healing and personal growth.
What are the Alternatives to secularisation and what sociologists stated them?
Stark and Bainbridge: Religious market theory, secularisation only focuses on decline in Europe, ignores rise in America and worldwide.
Supply not demand: e.g. CofE, inevitable decline
Finke = immigration of Asian communities to USA in 60’s led to steady growth of Buddhism
Norris+Inglehart: Existential security theory, people feel secure, low secular = Rwanda high = UK
What is the relationship between globalisation and religion and what did Meyer et Al and Singleton say about this?
Meyer et Al: says globalisation causes growing religious diversity + less tied to geographical locations e.g. deterritorialisation
Singleton: e.g. Islam reconstituted as a transnational religion > ‘Ummah’ (worldwide community of faith) in UK, China etc.
What is the impact of globalisation and what did Huntington, Kurtz, singleton and Nada say about this?
Huntington: Clash of civilisations, sees religion and identities as an important aspect of civilisations (can contradict one another)
Kurtz: globalisation has revitalised ‘culture wars’ e.g. islamaphobia
Singleton: rise of Islamic fundamentalism is the result of globalisation (‘cultural defence’)
India: Nada believes large majority of class believe in supernatural even though a lot are favouring secular worldview
What did Troeltsh and and Niebuhr day?
Troeltsh: two categories, churches +sects, churches are large and have a bureaucratic hierarchy and claim to be one truth, whereas sects are small/strict and often headed by a charismatic leader exclusive membership and claim to be one truth e.g. moonies
Niebuhr: 2 more, denominations+cults: denominations can vary in size membership less exclusive but don’t try to appeal to wider society with minor restrictions e.g. Methodist church, Jehovah’s witnesses
Cults - small and no hierarchy/ open to all and individualistic e.g. People’s temple
What did Bruce and Stark and Bainbridge say about these views?
Bruce: Troeltsh’s ides of churches no longer valid as no religious orgs have total religious monopoly. Sects and cults have flourished in recent years.
Stark and Bainbridge: Cults and sects are generally small religious groups that are in conflict with wider society.
What did Wilson, Giddens and stark and Bainbridge say about cults and sects?
Wilson: sects = charismatic leader; discipline
Giddens: Cults = focus on individual needs, works with other beliefs
Stark+Bainbridge: 3 categories of cults, Audience cult, Client cult and Cult movements
E.g. astrology, therapy and Scientology
What are the reasons for the growth of NRM’s?
Weber, Wallis, Stark+Bainbridge
Weber: Marginality, many ppl join NRM’s due to feeling marginalised from society e.g. poor
Wallis: Also applies to many middle class e.g. 60’s, hippies etc. not poor just disadvantaged
Wallis: Relative deprivation, many m/c felt deprived spiritually and morally
Stark+Bainbridge: when ppl felt ‘inadequate’ compared to those around them > joined cults
What are the other reasons for growth growth in NRM’s?
Wilson: Social change, Rapid social change leads to feelings of ‘anomie’ and ‘normalessness’ e.g. industrial revolution
Bruce = in modern society, secularisation moves ppl away from churches etc. But cults grow (less demanding)
NRM’s different to new age movements as new age not necessarily religious.
What caused the growth of new age movements and what did Heelas say about this?
Heelas: two common themes that characterise the New Age - Self spirituality (looking in yourself) And Detraditionalisation (rejects spiritual authority e.g. priest)
Heelas: Consumer culture - creates dissatisfaction because it never delivers the perfection it promises e.g. advertising whereas New Age offers alternative way to achieve perfection
What are the other reasons for the growth in New Age movements according to Drane and Bruce?
Drane: argues appeal is due to postmodern society as there is a loss of meta narratives
Bruce: feature of latest phase of modern society, not postmodernity e.g. modernity values individualism
Decline of organised religion is also a reason e.g. California lowest church going in USA > New Age the strongest
What did Wallis identify as the 3 types of NRM’s?
World rejecting: e.g. moonies, Manson family
World accomadating: often breakaways from churches or denominations, neither accept or reject the world
World affirming: Accept world as it is, optimistic, tolerant of others and claim to offer special knowledge e.g. Scientology, TM