Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

philosophy > religious language > Flashcards

religious language Flashcards

(69 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

What does cognitive mean?

A

Factual claim; can be known + checked for being true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does non cognitive mean?

A

Not meant to be known or factual
More just a metaphor/expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which scholars believed religious language is meaningless?

A

Karl Popper, Antony Flew, A.J Ayer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which scholars believed religious language is meaningful?

A

John Hick, Hare, Wittgenstein, Aquinas, Pseudo-Dionysius + Maimonides, Tillich

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What principle did A.J Ayer come up w?

A

Verification principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the verification principle claim?

A

R.L is meaningless bc there’s no evidence to support (synthetic) + they’re not true by definition (analytic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What example can we use for the verification principle?

A

The statement ‘my car is parked outside’ can be checked by going out + seeing to verify the statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does A.J Ayer say in his book?

A

Theism + atheism are nonsense bc neither can be proved on the basis of evidence
God is metaphysical so isn’t discoverable or describable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When did Ayer believe a statement is only meaningful?

A

Analytic (true by def.) OR
Synthetic (empirically verifiable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Verification principle not about?

A

Whether a statement is true or false: but whether its meaningful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who gives the parable of the gardener?

A

Flew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is verification in practice? Give an example

A

When there’s direct sense experience to support a statement
‘Theres a dragon next door’ = meaningful
Bc it can be checked by looking next door

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What’s verification in principle? Give an example

A

When we know how a statement can be tested empirically
‘There’s intelligence life elsewhere’ = meaningful
Bc we know what we need to do to test it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Ayer say about meaningfulness when applied to statements about God?

A

‘God exists’/’God loves’ etc is meaningless bc it can’t be verified in principle or practice: theres no evidence + theres no way to know how to test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are 3 strengths of A.J Ayer’s verification principle?

A
  • Straightforward
  • Aligns w science
  • Encourages clear use of language; some religious claims are obscure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are 2 weaknesses of A.J Ayer’s verification principle?

A
  • Straightforward doesn’t make it right - many are convinced that human responses to the world (philosophy + ethics) are important
  • Makes the assumption that science tells us everything important in the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are 2 OTHER weaknesses of A.J. Ayer’s verification principle?

A
  • Some statements about religion aren’t any more irrational than any other scientific assumptions
  • V.P. principle itself is meaningless bc it’s not empirically verifiable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Which scholar’s (2) go w falsification principle?

A

Karl Popper + Antony Flew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Popper argue?

A

Science works primarily through falsification than verification
A good scientist tries to falsify their data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When did Popper say we can show smth as meaningful?

A

When it can be falsified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Why would statements about God be meaningless acc to Popper?

A

Bc they’re not falsifiable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What parable does Flew give?

A

Parable of the gardener

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What does the parable of the gardener prove?

A

That anytime you try to disprove God’s existence, a theist will always have a response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What does Flew’s parable mean in terms of falsification?

A

You can’t falsify statements about God bc a theist wouldn’t let you; so they’re meaningless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Who does Flew draw upon in the falsification principle?
Karl Popper
26
What is a strength of the falsification principle?
Flew shows the approach of some religious believers to beliefs - they refuse to take challenges to beliefs + just find excuses
27
What is a weakness of Flew's falsification principle?
The prob of evil makes many theists question/lose their faith
28
Which scholar goes w the Eschatological verification principle?
John Hick
29
What was Hick's main point in his theory? Who was this in response to?
Response to A.J Ayer We will be able to verify God's existence - just after death
30
What does Hick's eschatological verification mean?
Claims about God won't be verified now, but eschatologically (at the end of time)
31
What parable does Hick give?
Parable of the celestial city
32
What is the point of the parable of the celestial city?
We'll all reach the same place; but the journey is the important bit
33
What are 3 strengths of Hick's eschatological verification?
- Claims that heaven is a real possibility - appeals to theists - Support of the view that religious claims are cognitive - Whenever we describe an experience, we're interpreting it
34
What are 2 weaknesses of Hick's eschatological verification?
- Doesn't mean its true - atheists would dismiss it - It's a statement that'll be verified IF true but can't be falsified
35
Which scholar goes w Religious language as an expression of a blik?
Hare
36
What parable does Hare give?
Parable of the lunatic
37
What does Hare's parable of the lunatic tell us?
Nothing can disprove what the lunatic believes; this is a blik
38
What are bliks?
A view of the world that we may derive from those around us (like a superstition)
39
What is a religious blik?
A common + powerful view that is often difficult to disprove to theists
40
What was the difference in what Flew and Hare believed about religious statements?
FLEW - religious statement are assertions about the world + are intended to be cognitive HARE - religious statements are bliks which are non cognitive but are an interpretation
41
What was the difference is what Hare + Flew believed about religious believers?
FLEW - religious believers allow nothing to count against their cog belief so religious statements are non-falsifiable + meaningless HARE - religious blik are non-falsifiable BUT theyre meaningful
42
What was the quote from Flew about qualifications?
Religious statements die the death of a thousand qualifications
43
What's a strength of Hare's argument?
Explains why there are diff factual claims in different religions
44
What's a weakness of Hare's argument?
Makes religion subjective bc it depends on how you see smth
45
What did Wittgenstein propose?
Language games
46
What did Wittgenstein say about language?
Meaning is usage Words gain meaning based on how they're used - context is important
47
What are language games?
Language creates diff meaning in diff situations
48
What Wittgenstein say about the word 'God'?
Its not an object Its a word used in religious context
49
What are 2 strengths of Wittgenstein's language games?
- Allows a range of meaning for language - Allows religious statements to be 'belief in'
50
What are 2 weaknesses of language games?
- It's impossible to enter into debate w someone coming from another lang game (atheism) - Most religious believers think their statements are cognitive
51
What did Aquinas propose?
Religious language as analogical
52
What does Aquinas reject?
Univocal (the same thing each time) and equivocal (means diff things in diff situations) language
53
What's Aquinas' analogy of attribution?
Its possible to say smth about God We can say God is good, wise etc
54
What's the example of the bull for Aquinas' analogy of attribution?
Bull is healthy; bulls urine is healthy If the bull isn't healthy, the urine won't be healthy
55
What is the example of Vanessa for Aquinas' analogy of attribution?
God is good; Vanessa is good God created Vanessa (like how the bull created the urine) so God is causally responsible for Vanessa's goodness
56
What's Aquinas' analogy of proportionality?
Humans have the power to do things + God has the power to do things, but God's power is proportionality greater than humans power
57
What is Aquinas basically saying about religious language?
It's still meaningful if you say smth but don't have to explain it
58
What are 3 strengths of Aquinas' analogical language?
- Gets rid of the prob of anthropomorphising God - Analogy helps explain God - Analogies are based on human experience + is cognitive
59
What are 2 weaknesses of Aquinas' analogical language?
- God is unknowable so what we say is limited - Same approach could be used to argue negative aspects of God 'God is evil'
60
Who are the scholars for via negativa?
Pseudo-Dionysius + Maimondes
61
What did Pseudo-Dionysius develop Via negativa for?
Emphasise God's transcendence + separates him from any literal description that limits him
62
What is Via negativa?
God is somehow known, yet remains unknowable We know God but he remains beyond knowledge
63
What does via negativa say we can't do?
We can't talk about God w out lang wo demising him
64
What does Maimonides say about God?
Saying God is powerful means he is being compared to humans power; reducing him to smth measurable
65
What are 3 strengths about via negativa?
- Avoid making God a 'thing' - Avoids anthropomorphism
66
What are 3 weaknesses of via negativa?
- Leaves humanity w the inability to understand/say anything about God - How can we worship a God we know nothing about? - Via negativa goes against Bible
67
Which scholar goes w religious language as symbolic?
Tillich
68
What does Tillich say about symbols + God?
Symbols are associated w things like how God is associated w things (like king)
69
What does Tillich say symbols contain? Give example
Contain in itself what it reps (e.g. American flag contains pride + dignity)

philosophy (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions