religious language

Question 1

VP

Answer 1

an analytic proposition or verifiable in principle

Question 2

Against VP

Answer 2

A-eschatological verification is possible

R-We could not verify God’s existence, we can with empirical objects as they have spatial dimension, but God doesnt look like anything, is everywhere and outside of time

M- The experience of God is self authenticating
A-self refuting
R-The principle is analytic thus meaningful “every meaningful sentence is either analytic or verifiable “ is a definition of the world meaning

M- not analytic, can deny that its definition is that but not that a square has 4 sides

Question 3

FP

Answer 3

same as vp but
3)It is empirically falsifiable in principle

Question 4

against Wittgenstein

Answer 4

A-dismisses the role of evidence
R-Can accept religion if it makes sense of human experiences
M-denying the role of evidence diminishes religion
A-dismisses the view of believers themselves