Remedies - non-pecuniary losses Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [1909]

manner of firing

A

Establishes the general rule that there is no reward of damages for mental distress or loss of reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jarvis v Swan’s Tours [1973]

holiday; non-pecuniary losses

A

Where the object of the contract is to provide pleasure and that is prevented by breach of contract, damages can be awarded for mental distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Jackson v Horizon Holidays Ltd [1975]

holiday; non-pecuniary losses

A

Lord Denning states that a party can recover for the distress of third parties he contracted to benefit, but this was rejected in later cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Watts v Morrow [1991]

no non-pecuniary losses unless the ‘very object’ of contract

A

Where a contract does not have the object of providing pleasure, damages for mental distress can nonetheless be awarded if it is the result of physical inconvenience caused by breach of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (no 1) [2001]

rejects damages for mental distress and anxiety, and aggravated damages for manner of breach

A

A shareholder may sue in respect of breach of duty that is independently owed to him (rather than the company) which resulted in a separate and distinct loss from any loss to the company. In such situations the Foss v Harbottle rule does not apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Godley v Perry [1960]

physical discomfort related to injury; non-pecuniary losses

A
  • severe injuries to boy from toy
  • damages for daily removal of artificial eye
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hobbs v L&S Railway Co [1875]

physical inconvenience and non-pecuniary losses

A

what it says

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ruxley Electronics and Construction v Forsyth [1996]

loss of amenity damages

A

Recovery for cost of reinstatement is subject to a reasonableness test of whether the cost of reinstatement is all out of proportion to the loss suffere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Farley v Skinner [2001]

house near airport; non-pecuniary losses; an object of the contract

A
  • Damages can be awarded for mental distress where pleasure is not entire or central object of the contract, only an important one
  • In relation to damages for ‘physical’ inconvenience and discomfort, ‘physical’ includes any displeasure derived from the physical senses of sight, touch, hearing, smell, taste
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly