Research Designs Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

What types of Research Design exist?

A

Descriptive (PO)

Analytical (PICO)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the different sub-categories of Descriptive Research Design ?

A

Survey/case reports

Qualitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the different sub-categories of Analytical Research Design ?

A

Observational analytic

Experimental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the Descriptive Research Design

A
  • non analytical, not to quantify relationship, no hypothesis
  • without an “intervention” (retrospective)
  • N can be small but # of variables can be large
  • descriptive information to support or invalidate theories
  • reveal important findings = new hypothesis
  • examples : case reports, case series, single case design, qualitative studies and surveys, cross sectional studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the Analytical Research Design, observational analytic branch

A
  • quantify relationship between two factors : Effect of intervention/exposure on outcome
  • test hypothesis
  • measuring intervention, exposure (case control, cohort, cross sectional studies)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the Analytical Research Design, experimental branch

A
  • Researchers manipulate intervention/exposure
  • Quasi experimental: test causality with sub-optimal variable control (before/after design)
  • True experimental: test causality with optimal variable control (randomized control trial)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Description of Case-Study/ Case Series

A
  • Descriptive information, exposure, outcome
  • No control group
  • Explore new treatment/topic on which limited knowledge exists
  • Elaborate new hypothesis
  • Often qualitative research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Definition of Case-Study/Case series

A

A participant with a condition of interest will provide information about clinical outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Description of Case Control Design

A
  • Retrospective
  • Cases (with a specific characteristic or situation vs. controls allowing a comparison between differences
  • No active control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Definition of Case Control Design

A

A retrospective measurement consisting into a comparison between participants with and without outcomes of interest assessed regarding previous exposure to intervention or causal factor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the advantages of Case Control Design?

A
  • Quick and cheap
  • Feasible on very rare disorders or those with long lag between exposure and outcome
  • Fewer subjects needed than cross sectional studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the Disadvantages of Case Control Design?

A
  • Reliance on recall or records to determine exposure status
  • Confounders
  • Selection of control groups is difficult
  • Potential bias: recall, selection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Description of Cohort Design

A

-prospective (can also be retrospective)
-one group is not exposed to the situation of interest
VS.
-one group is exposed to the situation of interest
- the allocation of groups is not under control
-there are no causal relationships between the characteristics of groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Definition of Cohort Design

A

Prospective analysis of the outcome of a study taking place between participants exposed and not exposed to the intervention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the advantages of Cohort Design?

A
  • Ethically safe
  • Subjects can be matched
  • Can establish timing and directionality of events
  • Eligibility criteria and outcome assessments can be standardized
  • Administratively easier and cheaper than RCT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the disadvantage of Cohort Design?

A
  • Controls may be difficult to identify
  • Exposure may be linked to a hidden confounder
  • Blinding is difficult
  • Randomisation not present
  • For rare disease, large sample sizes or long follow up is necessary
17
Q

What are the characteristics of Cross Sectional Design?

A
  • At 1 point in time
  • Which factors influence particular outcome
  • Exploratory
  • Relatively inexpensive, easy
  • No causality
18
Q

Definition of Cross Sectional Design

A

Measurements on outcomes and factors made at one point in time on a group of participants.

19
Q

What are the Advantages of Cross Sectional Design?

A
  • Cheap and simple

- Ethically safe

20
Q

What are the disadvantages of Cross Sectional Design ?

A
  • Establishes association at most, not causality
  • Recall bias susceptibility
  • Confounders may be unequally distributed
  • Group sizes may be unequal
21
Q

What are the characteristics of Before/After Design ?

A
  • Prospective
  • Assess and compare outcomes before and after intervention
  • No control group, subjects serve as their own control
22
Q

Definition of Before/After Design

A

Participants -> Assessment -> Intervention -> Outcome studied in a prospective time

23
Q

What are the characteristics of Single Case design ?

A

-Prospective
-Cfr. Before/after design
-no control group : individual subject serves as his own control
-participants studied during multiple phases :
Minimum 2 designated by letters by convention
Baseline (A) and treatment intervention (B)

24
Q

Definition of Single Case Design

A

Individual client -> Baseline evaluation (A) -> Intervention (B) -> Evaluation (A) -> Intervention (B) studied prospectively

25
What are the characteristics of Randomized controlled trial (RCT) ?
- Experimental study : “does things to people in order to observe the effects” - Random allocation -> internal validity - 1 experimental group vs 1 control group (controlled manipulation of at least one independent variable) - test effectiveness of intervention (causality) - highly controlled
26
Definition of RCT
Participants -> Stratification -> Randomization -> Experimental group/Control group -> Outcome
27
What are the advantages of RCT ?
- Unbiased distribution of Confounders - blinding more likely - randomization facilitates statistical analysis
28
What are the disadvantages of RCT ?
- Expensive time and money - Volunteer bias - Ethically problematic at times
29
Compare RCT and SCD
-Major differences : Means by which the experimental control is achieved Number of participants in the study Both are scientifically credible when properly applied.
30
Characteristics of Experimental Design
-Random Assignment -Researcher controlled manipulation of independent variable -Researcher control of experimental situation and setting, including control / comparison group -control of variance : Clearly spelled out sampling criteria Precisely defined independent variable Carefully measured dependent variable
31
What are the types of variables ?
- independent variable - dependent variable - extraneous variable
32
What are the validity criteria of experimental trial ?
- comparability of the groups at the beginning - large numbers - blinding of assessors, raters and statisticians - no confounding factors - reliability of the measurements
33
What are the potential causes of bias in quantitative research ?
- Researchers - Components of the environment the settings - Individual participant or sample - How groups were formed - Measurement tools - Data collection process - Data and duration of the study - Statistical tests and analysis interpretation
34
Why is rigor important ?
- because the validity of the study depends on it - striving for excellence in research and adherence to detail - precise measurement tools, representative sample and tightly controlled study design - logical reasoning is essential - precision, accuracy, detail and order required
35
Definition of Internal Validity
Extend to which the independent variable caused the outcome of the study. Are you actually measuring what you were supposed to measure ? Avoiding confounding factors.
36
What is external validity ?
The possibility to generalize results.
37
Define reliability
- the accuracy and repeatability of the measured outcome, divided between inter rater and intra rater
38
Reliability vs validity
Reliability is about the consistency of a measure and validity is about the consistency of the measure