research methods Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q

what is primary data?

A

information collected by sociologists themselves for their own purposes, may be to obtain a first-hand picture or to test a hypothesis

e.g. surveys, participant observation ect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

advantages and disadvantages of primary data?

A

advantages: sociologists can gather precisely the information they need to test their hypothesis
disadvantages: costly and time consuming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is secondary data?

A

information that has been collected or created by someone else for their own purposes, which the sociologist can then use

e.g. official statistics, documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

advantages and disadvantages of secondary data

A

advantages: quick and cheap
disadvantages: may not provide exactly the information that sociologists need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is quantitive data?

A

information in a numerical form

e.g. official statistics, surveys, opinion polls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is qualitative data?

A

gives a feel for what something is like

e.g. participant observation, in depth interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are practical issues?

A

time and money
personal skills and characteristics (may affect their ability to use different methods)
research opportunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ethical issues

A

informed consent
confidentiality and privacy
vulnerable groups (e.g. children)
covert research (can’t get informed consent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

theoretical issues

A

validity: produces a true or genuine picture of what something is really like
reliability: replicable, can be repeated for another research
representativeness: typical cross-section of the group we are interested in, so generalisations can be made
methodological perspective: positivists or interpretivists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what factors influence choice of topic?

A

sociologists perspective (e.g. feminist more likely to study domestic violence)
society’s values (e.g. rise of feminism/ environmental issues, green crimes)
practical factors: inaccessibility of certain situations to the researcher
funding bodies: research requires funding from external body, they determine topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what sampling techniques can be used to obtain a representative sample?

A

random sampling: selected by chance, large sample should reflect population

systematic sampling: every nth person in the sampling frame is selected

stratified random sampling: researcher stratifies sampling frame by age, class gender etc, sample is created in the same proportions

quota sampling: populations is stratified and then each interviewer is given a quote of a certain characteristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

researching pupils

A

power and status: between teachers/researchers and pupils, overcome by group interviews instead of one on one

ability and understanding: pupils vocabulary, thinking skills, confidence more limited, overcome by taking care when wording questions

vulnerability: pupils limited power and ability, informed consent from parents, pupil should also be informer, ‘gatekeepers’ create practical issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

researching teachers

A

power and status: teachers have more power and status and have a duty of care towards their pupils, classroom reinforces power so researchers develop a ‘cover’

impression management: teachers are used to being observed and scrutinised, highly skilled at ‘impression management’, manipulating the impression others have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

researching classrooms

A

classroom is a highly controlled setting (activities, noise, language) so behaviour may not accurately reflect what they really think and feel

mostly two social roles in the classroom - teacher and pupil, so straightforward to observe and analyse

gatekeepers: access to classrooms controlled by head teachers and child protection laws, difficult to obtain access

peer groups: when in school-based groups pupils more sensitive to peer pressure and the need to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

researching schools

A

schools’ own data: marketisation means lots of secondary data publicly available about schools (exams results, truancy), some records confidential so researchers can’t gain access, schools could falsify data to look better

the law: law requires pupils to attend school, so researcher knows where everyone is, but since role is education, teachers see research as interfering in schools function

gatekeepers: head teachers and governors can refuse access, often view research negatively (discipline adversely affected, bad for classroom relationships)

school organisation: have rules and hierarchies and researchers could become part of hierarchy (students see them as teachers, teachers view them as inspectors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

researching parents

A

parents can influence education e.g. primary socialisation, parental choice

access to parents: most parent-child interaction takes place in the home which is closed to researchers. difficult to contact without schools cooperation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

researchers own experience of education

A

researchers need to be aware that their personal characteristics and their own experience of education can influence their research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

advantages of lab experiments

A
  • generates quantitive data
  • control of variables
  • reliable
  • experimenter detatched
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

disadvantages of lab experiments

A
  • artificial (low validity)
  • Hawthorne effect
  • ethics
  • small scale (unrepresentative)
  • interpretivists say innapropriate for studying people because they have freewill
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

advantages of field experiments

A
  • less artificial, set in real-world situations

- validity, in usual social environment so people will act normally and genuine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

disadvantages of field experiments

A
  • less control over variables
  • limited application, few situations that can be adapted to be a field experiment, only measure what they do, not why
  • ethical problems, don’t usually gain informed consent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is the Hawthorne effect?

A

where the subjects of a research study know they are being studied and begin to behave differently as a result, thereby undermining the study validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is the comparative method?

A

a ‘thought experiment’ that involves identifying two groups that are the same except for one characteristics e.g. religion

Durkheim compared suicide rates of otherwise similar protestants and catholics, concluded that catholics lower suicide rate was caused by their higher levels of social integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

advantages and disadvantages of the comparative method

A

advantages: avoids artificiality, can be used to study past events and poses no ethical problems
disadvantages: no control over variables so can’t be certain if true cause is discovered

25
advantages of questionnaires
- quick and cheap - reliable - hypothesis testing about cause-and-effect relationships - detachment and objectivity (little or no personal contact between researchers and respondents) - representativeness
26
advantages of structured interviews
- reliable, fixed questions - representative, quicker than unstructured - quick and cheap - interviewer-interviewee contact, face to face means higher response rate than mailed questionnaires - limited interviewer effect, limited contact because questions fixed
27
disadvantages of structured interviews
- more expensive, time consuming than questionnaires - less reliable because interviews have different social characteristics so not easily replicable - closed Qs, limited opportunities for original responses so less valid - not free from interviewer bias, age, gender, class may influence their responses
28
what are structured interviews?
face-face or over the phone delivery of a questionnaire, a pre-set list of questions asked of all interviewees in the same way
29
what are unstructured interviews?
ask mainly open-ended questions with no fixed set of questions, are guided as much by the interviewee as by the interviewer
30
advantages of unstructured interviews
more valid, in several ways: - informal nature means rapport developed between interviewer and interviewee so more likely to open up and be honest - flexibility means interviewer can follow up any issues raised - open ended questioning allows interviewees scope to give detailed, in-depth responses
31
disadvantages of unstructured interviews
- not reliable, hard to classify and count responses so statistical evidence can't be created so correlations and comparisons not established - difficult to replicate - not representative, take time so smaller sample so can't make generalisations - cost, interviewers need to be trained in sensitivity - not as valid, more interviewer bias
32
typical characteristics of participant observation
- observer finding a role within the group that allows them to study group behaviour - researcher involves of fieldwork - can either be overt or covert
33
what is participant observation?
the researcher actually takes part in an event or the everyday life of the group while observing it
34
what is non-participant observation?
the researcher simply observes the group or event without taking part in it e.g. use a two way mirror to observe children playing
35
advantages of participant observation
high validity - rich qualitative 'real world' data that provides a picture of how they really live subjective insights - 'verstehen' German word meaning empathy, researcher gain empathy through personal experience flexibility - if a new issue arises during study observation can be adapted accordingly, no need for fixed hypothesis, as new situations encountered, explanations can be formulated and sociologist can change direction
36
advantages of overt observation
- avoids ethical problem of obtaining information by deceit - allows observer to ask naive but important questions that only an outsider could ask e.g. ask gang member why do you rob and steal? - observer can openly take notes
37
disadvantages of participant observation
- a group may refuse the researcher permission to observe them, or may prevent them from seeing everything e.g. Punch Amsterdam police officers 'we only let you see what we wanted you to see' - risks creating the Hawthorne effect which undermines validity
38
advantages of cover observation
practical - reduces risk of altering peoples behaviour and sometimes the only way to obtain valid information, especially when researching activities that people would rather key secret e.g. crime or promiscuity
39
disadvantages of covert observation
practical: - requires researcher to keep up an act and risk of cover being blown - cannot take notes openly and must rely on memory and opportunity to write them in secret - researcher cannot ask naive but important questions ethical: - immoral to deceive people, can't obtain informed consent and reveal purpose of study - may have to participate in immoral or illegal activities as part of their 'cover' role
40
disadvantages of participant observation
- unscientific, being open-ended and subjective research, no fixed procedure and not standardised system of measurement, can't be replicated - 'one-off' investigations of small social groups, unlikely to be representative so generalisations can't be made - not valid because: Hawthorne effect, 'going native' - practical problems: getting in, staying in, getting out
41
what are the two main sources of secondary data?
official statistics | documents
42
what are official statistics?
quantitive data gathered by the government or other official bodies e.g. statistics on births, divorces, crime. the ten-yearly census of UK population is a major source
43
advantages of official statistics
practical - free source of huge amounts of sate which normally would be very expensive to collect and impossible to compel citizens to provide information, allow comparison and show trends over time representative - large numbers so generalisations can be made reliability - compiled in a standardised way by trained staff positivists say true and objective measures of the real rate of crime, suicide etc, scientific, can be used to test hypotheses
44
disadvantages of official statistics
practical - may not be statistics available for topic interested in e.g. Durkheim suicide religion, definitions state uses may be different from sociologists e.g. define poverty or truancy differently representativeness - some statistics not representative e.g. British crime survey only based on a sample of population validity - 'hard' statistics valid e.g. births, deaths marriages, 'soft' statistics less valid e.g. police statistics don't record all crimes interpretivists say statistics are socially constructed, represent the labels people give to the behaviour of others e.g. suicides represent number of decisions by coroners to label deaths as suicide
45
what are documents?
any written text e.g. personal diaries, government reports, newspapers etc
46
what are two types of document?
public documents - produced by organisations such as government departments e.g. ousted reports personal documents - first-person accounts of social events and personal experiences, include writers' feelings and attitudes
47
what is the criteria for evaluating documents?
authenticity - is the documents what it claims to be credibility - is the documents believable and accurate representativeness - is the evidence in the document typical meaning - researcher may need skills to understand a document, translated from a foreign language, interpret what document means to writer
48
advantages of documents
- personal documents enable researcher to get close to reality, richly detailed qualitative data (interpretivists favour) - sometimes documents are only source of information, e.g studying the past - offer an extra check on results obtained by primary data - cheap becase someone else has gathered information, don't take time
49
what is content analysis?
a method for dealing systematically with contents of documents, used when analysing documents produced by mass media enables sociologists to product quantitive data from qualitative documents
50
advantages of content analysis?
- cheap - easy to find source of material e.g. newspapers, television broadcasts - positivists say useful source of quantitive, scientific data
51
advantages of using official statistics in education
- make comparisons between achievements of social groups based on ethnicity or social class, statistics collected at regular intervals so comparisons over time - highly representative, school census three times a year
52
disadvantages of using official statistics in education
- state may not collect statistics on social class, only students entitled to free school meals, stigma around this so some pupils don't claim them - school may manipulate attendance figures by re-defining poor attenders as being on study leave, education market puts pressure on schools
53
advantages of using documents to investigate education
- easily accessible because of policies emphasising parental choice - few ethical problems with public documents because already in public domain - some official documents are legally required of all schools, so more representative
54
disadvantages of using documents to investigate education
- personal documents more difficult to access, some documents confidential e.g. pupils' disciplinary methods - sometimes deceitful to obtain personal documents - not everything included in statistics e.g. not all racist incidents documented
55
what is structured observation?
uses an observation schedule to identify and measure patterns of behaviour, categories on schedule are coded so data can be easily collected and turned into statistics
56
advantages of structured observation
- reliable because can be replicated using the same fixed categories - allows quantitive data to be produced quickly, comparisons and patterns
57
disadvantages of structured observation
lack validity: - counting frequency doesn't say about their meaning - events may not fit any category, or may overlap several categories - different observers may place same event in different categories (reliable) - intensive method so only useful in small-scale interactions
58
what are ethical issues?
ethics refers to moral issues of right and wrong, methods that sociologists use to study people may raise a range of ethical issues
59
what are theoretical issues?
refers to questions about what we think society is like and whether we can obtain an accurate, truthful picture of it. our views on these issues affect the kind of methods used