RESEARCH METHODS Flashcards

1
Q

QUALITATIVE DATA

A

EXPRESSED IN WORDS AND NON-NUMERICAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

QUANTITATIVE DATA

A

CAN BE COUNTED, USUALLY GIVEN AS NUMBERS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (IV)

A

VARIABLE THAT IS MANIPULATED BY RESEARCHER (OR CHANGES NATURALLY) SO EFFECT ON DV CAN BE MEASURED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DEPENDENT VARIABLE (DV)

A

VARIABLE THAT IS MEASURED BY THE RESEARCHER
ANY EFFECT ON DV SHOULD BE CAUSED BY CHANGE IN IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

INTERNAL VALIDITY

A

CONTROL OF VARIABLES TO ENSURE CHANGE IN DV SOLELY DUE TO CHANGE IN IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

EXTERNAL VALIDITY

A

DEGREE TO WHICH RESEARCH FINDINGS CAN BE GENERALISED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY

A

GENERALISED TO OTHER SETTINGS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

POPULATION VALIDITY

A

GENERALISED TO OTHER GROUPS OF PEOPLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TEMPORAL VALIDITY

A

GENERALISED OVER TIME

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

RELIABILITY

A

HOW CONSISTENT A MEASURING DEVICE IS - INCLUDES PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS OR OBSERVATIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS

A

PARTICIPANT THINKS THEY FIGURE OUT WHAT THE STUDY IS FOR SO ACT IN A WAY THEY THINK IS APPROPRIATE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RESEARCH QUESTION

A

A QUESTION THAT THE RESEARCH ENDEAVOURS TO ANSWER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AIM

A

GENERAL STATEMENT OF WHAT RESEARCHER INTENDS TO INVESTIGATE (PURPOSE OF STUDY)
ALWAYS BEGINS ‘TO INVESTIGATE’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HYPOTHESIS

A

CLEAR TESTABLE PREDICTION THAT STATES RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VARIABLES BEING INVESTIGATES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DIRECTIONAL HYPOTHESIS (ONE-TAILED)

A

IDENTIFIES DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LEVELS OF IV
USUALLY BASED ON PRIOR RESEARCH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NON-DIRECTIONAL HYPOTHESIS (TWO-TAILED)

A

STATES DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LEVELS OF IV BUT DOESN’T SPECIFY NATURE OF DIFFERENCES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

NULL HYPOTHESIS

A

STATES THERE WILL BE NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE IV AND DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

OPERATIONALISATION

A

HOW RESEARCHER DEFINES VARIABLES IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO MEASURE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

CONTROL VARIABLES - EXTRANEOUS

A

ANY VARIABLE THAT DOES NOT VARY SYSTEMATICALLY WITH IV, THEREFORE DOESN’T ACT AS ALTERNATIVE IV, BUT MAY HAVE EFFECT ON DV
NUISANCE VARIABLE

19
Q

CONTROL VARIABLES - CONFOUNDING

A

DOES VARY SYSTEMATICALLY WITH IV, MEANING CHANGES IN DV MAY BE DUE TO CF
CONFOUNDS CAUSE AND EFFECT RELATIONSHIP

20
Q

CONTROL VARIABLES - PARTICIPANT

A

CENTRED AROUND PARTICIPANTS USED, COULD CONFOUND RESULTS IF NOT CONTROLLED

20
Q

INTERNAL VALIDITY

A

EXTENT TO WHICH RESEARCHER CAN BE CONFIDENT THEIR RESEARCH IS MEASURING EFFECT OF IV ON DV AND CAN ESTABLISH CAUSE AND EFFECT RELATIONSHIP

20
Q

EXTERNAL VALIDITY

A

EXTENT TO WHICH RESULTS CAN BE GENERALISED TO OTHER SETTINGS, POPULATIONS AND OVER TIME

20
Q

ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY (EXTERNAL)

A

GENERALISABLE TO OTHER SETTINGS

20
POPULATION VALIDITY (EXTERNAL)
GENERALISABLE TO OTHER POPULATIONS
21
TEMPORAL VALIDITY (EXTERNAL)
GENERALISABLE OVER TIME
22
TYPES OF EXPERIMENT
- LAB - FIELD - NATURAL - QUASI
23
LAB EXPERIMENT
- CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT - MANIPULATE IV, RECORD EFFECT ON DV, STRICT CONTROL OF EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES
24
LAB EXPERIMENT STRENGTHS
- HIGH CONTROL - MORE CERTAINTY OVER CAUSE + EFFECT RELATIONSHIP -> HIGH INTERNAL VALIDITY - HIGHLY REPLICABLE - RELIABLE PROCEDURE
25
lab experiment limitations
- artificial environment - lack of generalisability - low external validity - low mundane realism - risk of demand characteristics
26
field experiment
- takes place in natural setting - manipulates IV and records DV
27
field experiment strengths
- higher mundane realisms (but not always) - more authentic behaviour - high external validity
27
field experiment limitations
- less control over EVs and CVs - difficult to establish c + e, difficult to replicate - ethical issues like consent and privacy
28
natural experiment
- change in IV not directly manipulated, naturally occurs in environment - records effect on chosen DV
28
natural experiment strengths
- opportunities for research that would otherwise be unethical to manipulate - real world environment - high external validity, generalisability
28
natural experiment limitations
- naturally occurring IV so difficult to replicate - limits generalisability - participants not randomly allocated - lab setting sometimes used
29
quasi experiment
(technically not experiment) - IV naturally occurs in participants - ie autism
30
quasi experiment strengths
- controlled conditions - highly replicable procedure
31
quasi experiment limitations
- cannot be randomly allocated - risk of confounding variables - IV not deliberately changed - difficult to confirm c + e relationship
31
31
32
32
32
33