Research Methods Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

Hypothesis

A

A precise, testable statement about the predicted outcome of the investigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of hypotheses

A

Null - no diff
Non-directional - diff
Directional - specific diff, one higher etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Independent variable

A

The variable that is manipulated by the researcher. Assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dependent variable

A

The variable that the researcher measures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Any variable. which may effect the dependent variable other than the IV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Aim

A

A statement about the purpose of an investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Operationalising variables

A

Making something clear or unambiguous.

Process of devising a clear way of measuring something so that another person knows exactly what you have done.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experimental designs

A

Independent groups
Repeated measures
Matched pairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of independent groups

A
  • many differences between groups - participant variables
  • require more participants
    + eliminates practice/fatigue effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of repeated measures

A
  • takes longer for each participant to complete experiment as do it twice
  • two sets of materials
  • order effects or practice effects
    + controls differences between people that could affect dv
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of matched pairs

A
  • impractical to match people at beginning of experiment
    +researcher gains control over extraneous variables
    +no problems with order effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Counterbalancing

In repeated measures

A

Half the participants do conditions in one particular order and the other half do the conditions in the opposite order - to balance possible order effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Types of experiment

A

Laboratory
Field
Natural
Quasi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Quantitative data

A

Information that is gathered in the course of an experiment that is in numerical form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Standard deviation

A

Average amount that the scores differ from the mean.

Less affected by outliers compared to the range. More sensitive version of dispersion compared to range. Harder to calculate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Measure of central tendency

A

Mean
Median
Mode

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Sampling of participants

A

Random
Opportunity
Volunteer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Demand characteristics

A

Screw you effect
Social desirability
Guessing the aim of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Reliability

A

Extent to which a measure is consistent.

20
Q

Assessing reliability

A

Inter-observer - the extent to which all observers agree
Test-retest - the extent to which the results can be repeated
Split-half - he extent to which a questionnaire is consistent

21
Q

Improving reliability

A

Standardised instructions
Train observers
Operationalise variables
Controlled conditions

22
Q

Replicability

A

Being able to do a study again with a similar sample, the same methods and procedure, in the same similar setting.

23
Q

Validity

A

Results that are accurate and true. Its to the extent to which something accurately investigates what it intends to

24
Q

Internal validity

A

The extent the study measures what it sets out to measure

25
External validity
The extent to which we can generalise our findings accurately
26
Types of External validity
Population | Ecological
27
Population validity
The extent to which you can accurately generalise findings to other people
28
Ecological validity
He extent to which you can accurately generalise findings to real life
29
Types of internal validity
Face Temporal Concurrent
30
Face validity
Extent to which a measure appears on the surface to measure what it is supposed to measure
31
Concurrent validity
A way of assessing validity by comparing the results with another relevant measure.
32
Temporal validity
The extent to which we can accurately generalise from the results of a study that was conducted several years ago to today.
33
Meta-analysis
A way of drawing all the data from studies in a topic area together to make overall conclusions Uses secondary data
34
Strengths of meta-analysis
Large data set - improves power of statistical analysis. Only best studies included - increases validity. Differences between findings of different studies can be explored. Don't raise ethical problems as no testing.
35
Weaknesses of meta-analysis
Bias - what studies to include Only published studies included - less valid If studies poor quality - limited value Only work with quantitative
36
Primary data
All data gathered by the researcher deliberately for the purpose of the study
37
Observation
Research technique, where behaviour is watcher or recorded either in its natural context or in a laboratory setting
38
Event sampling
Where observer counts how often a specific behaviour happens.
39
Observation techniques
Naturalistic Controlled Covert - participants unaware of observation Overt Non-participant - observing not in situation(video link) Participant
40
Case study
In depth studies of an individual or a small group of individuals regarding a topic of interest to the researcher
41
Case study features
``` Interviews with individual Interviews with family Observations Medical notes Psychological tests ```
42
Strengths of case studies
Vital as rare Rich in detail Provide information that could change theories
43
Weaknesses of case studies
Difficult to generalise Single psychologist - bias Ethical - intrusive? As so unique its difficult/impossible to replicate (can't determine reliability)
44
Qualitative data
Information collected in non-numerical form. Descriptions of behaviour, quotes from interview etc
45
Strengths of observational research
Obtain true and accurate picture of natural behaviour. Usually high external validity. May be only practical way of collecting data
46
Weaknesses of observational research
Sometimes difficult to operationalise. Can be time consuming. Sometimes ethical issues. Observer bias may influence what is recorded - lower validity. Naturalistic observations are very hard to replicate as little control over variables -impossible to recreate conditions.
47
Research methods
Experimental Correlational Case study Meta-analysis