Research Methods Flashcards

(101 cards)

1
Q

Types of validity

A
Face 
Construct 
Concurrent 
Criterion 
Population 
Ecological
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Binomial sign test

A

Repeated measures

Nominal data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Chi-squared

A

Independent measures

Nominal data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mann-Whitney U

A

Independent measures

Ordinal data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Alternate hypothesis

A

There WILL be a significant difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Null hypothesis

A

There WON’T be a significant difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

One-tailed hypotheses

A

Directional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Two-tailed hypotheses

A

Non-directional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Spearman’s Rho

A

Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Unstructured interview

A

No pre-determined questions

✅ detailed, more comfortable

❌ time consuming, may go off topic, open to bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Closed questions

A

Restricted response

✅ easy to analyse

❌lacks detail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Negative correlation

A

As one increases the other decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Response bias

A

When people chose the middle option

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Criterion validity

A

Refers to the extent the test scores can predict a future behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Construct validity

A

Whether a measure is assessing it’s underlying constructs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Population validity

A

Evaluated whether the sample represents the entire population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ecological validity

A

Evaluated whether the results of a study can be generalised to real life situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Naturalistic observation

A

Carried out in a natural environment where you’d expect to see that behaviour occur

✅ ecological validity

❌ less control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Structured observation

A

The researcher has a behaviour checklist to tally

✅ clear direction

❌ behaviours that aren’t on the checklist don’t get recorded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Participant observation

A

Where the researcher is apart of the group that is being observed

✅ gain first hand data

❌ observer bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Non-participant observation

A

Researcher not apart of the group being observed

✅ less chance of observer bias

❌ miss certain behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Overt observation

A

P’s know they’re being observed

✅ ethical

❌ demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Covert observation

A

P’s don’t know they’re being observed

✅ no demand characteristics

❌ less ethical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Observer bias

A

Where they interpret the behaviour they want

❌ less likely to measure what intends to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Random sampling
Equal chance of being chosen ✅ unbiased ❌ time consuming, less willing
26
Order of a report
``` Abstract Introduction Method Results Discussion Bibliography/references Appendices ```
27
Wilcoxon’s test
Repeated measures | Ordinal data
28
Report: abstract
``` General aims/hypothesis Sample Design/procedure Results Conclusions ```
29
Repeated measures
P’s complete all conditions ✅ don’t have to find double the amount of p’s, no individual differences ❌ experience order effects, demand characteristics
30
Matched pairs
P’s from different conditions are matched ✅ avoids order effects, less chance of demand characteristics ❌individual differences, more p’s
31
Lab
Controlled conditions, manipulate IV ✅ easily replicated ❌ lacks ecological validity
32
Snowball sampling
Asking p’s to nominate another person ✅ find people with rare characteristics ❌ time consuming, bias
33
Opportunity sampling
Selecting people who are readily available at the time ✅ quick, easy, cheap ❌ biased, unrepresentative
34
Volunteer sampling
Select themselves to participate ✅ p’s willing ❌ time consuming, unrepresentative
35
Ethnocentrism
When a sample is taken from one culture/area
36
Nominal data
Where data is in separate categories
37
Ordinal data
Data is ordered in some way
38
Measures of dispersion
How spread out the data is
39
Standard deviation
Measures how spread out the data is from the mean High - very spread out from the mean Low - close to the mean 0 - all the data values are the same
40
% of 1 standard deviations % of 2 standard deviations % of 3 standard deviations
1 - 68% 2 - 95% 3 - 99.7%
41
Field
In the field observing, manipulate IV on DV
42
Quasi
IV not manipulated, naturally occurring ✅ no demand characteristics ❌ difficult to see cause and effect
43
Structured interview
Pre-determined questions ✅ clear direction, easy to replicate ❌ may not ask questions as it’s focused on set questions, feel too formal
44
Semi-structured interview
Pre-determined questions but can go off topic if necessary ✅ flexible ❌ can go off topic, time consuming
45
Open questions
No restricted response ✅ gives reasons, detail ❌ difficult to analyse
46
Likert scale
Indicate how much they agree/disagree with a statement ✅ easy to analyse ❌ response bias
47
Correlation
How strongly 2 variables are related to each other ✅ strength in relationship, may suggest further research ❌ cannot assume cause and effect, don’t always get details behind data
48
Independent measures
P’s complete 1 condition ✅ no order effects, no demand characteristics ❌ individual differences, need more p’s
49
Positive correlation
Both co-variables increase/decrease together
50
No correlation
They are uncorrelated | No relationship
51
Correlation coefficient
Refers to a number between +1 and -1 and states how strong a correlation is +1 positive correlation -1 negative correlation Near 0 weak correlation 0 no correlation
52
Social desirability bias
People change answer as they want to look good
53
Threats to validity
``` Observer bias Researcher bias Demand characteristics Social desirability bias Order effects Individual differences Response bias ```
54
Face validity
Whether the study is measuring what it appears to on the surface if it
55
Concurrent validity
Comparing the results of one measurement to another
56
Unstructured observation
The researcher doesn’t have a pre-determined behaviour checklist ✅ not restricted ❌ lose sight of actual observation
57
Controlled observation
In a controlled setting, researcher controls who they observe and p’s often know ✅ more control ❌ demand characteristics
58
Behavioural categories
Where there are categories of behaviour/checklist to observe ✅ gives researcher direction ❌ restricted
59
Coding frames
Where behavioural categories are coded and can be rated for severity ✅ contain more detail ❌ observer bias
60
Inter-rater reliability
2 or more observers observe the same behaviour, time, behaviour checklist and compare data ✅ can see if they recorded data in similar way ❌ time consuming
61
Event sampling
Researcher recording a behaviour every time it happens ✅ less likely to miss behaviours ❌ difficult to keep track
62
Time sampling
The observer records what the participant is doing in fixed time categories ✅ less likely to miss behaviours ❌ miss some behaviours
63
Observer effects
When the presence of an observer in an overt observation changes the behaviour of the p’s ❌ demand characteristics
64
Report: introduction
Background research | 2 hypothesis
65
Report: method
Design Participants Materials Procedure
66
Target population
Group you’re trying to find out about
67
Interval data
Where units of equal measurements are used
68
Variance
Measures how much a set of values is spread out
69
Report: results
Descriptive statistics | Inferential statistics
70
Report: discussion
Draw conclusions from results Evaluate experiment Consider modifications for future research
71
Report: bibliography/ references
Reference from any source used | The background research from introduction
72
Report: appendices
Relate to method and results Materials Consent form Debrief
73
Questionnaires
✅ large numbers of participants, quick ❌ low response rates, less flexible, bias
74
Rating scales
Represent thoughts/feelings using a number Not at all 1 2 3 4 5 a lot ✅ easy to analyse ❌ response bias
75
Semantic differential scale
Measures a person’s attitudes towards something by putting something on a scale between 2 descriptive words ✅ easy to analyse ❌ response bias
76
Harvard referencing
Milgram.S (1963) Behavioural Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (in italics), 67, 371-378 Name, date, title of paper, journal published in, volume number, pages
77
Levels of measurement
Nominal Ordinal Internal
78
Raw data
Raw data = primary data (collected first hand)
79
Descriptive statistics
``` Mean Median Mode Variance Standard deviation Range ```
80
Measures of central tendency
Mean Median Mode
81
Measures of dispersion
Variance Standard deviation Range
82
Graphs
``` Bar chart - categories Scattergraph - correlation Pie chart - categories Line graph - compare 2 conditions Histogram- continuous data ```
83
Range
Biggest - lowest + 1
84
Standard deviation calculation
``` Calculate mean Subtract mean from each value Square each result Calculate squared differences (no. Of values -1) Square root ```
85
DAJO: own experiences
Observation - student behaviour in cafe, observing shopping behaviour in a mall Experiment - picture vs words Correlation - height vs shoe size Self-report - anything
86
Degrees of freedom
(Number of rows of data - 1) x (number of columns of data - 1)
87
Quantitative data
Data in form of numbers ✅ easy to analyse, make comparisons ❌ doesn’t give context, can distort truth
88
Qualitative data
Data in the form of words ✅ depth, less open to bias ❌ hard to analyse, open to interpretation
89
Type 1 error
False positive Wrongly accepted alternate instead of accepting the null
90
Type 2 error
False negative Wrongly accepted null instead of accepting the alternate
91
Probability
The likelihood of an event of numbers occurs due to chance P<0.05 5% chance 95% significant Accept alternate
92
Primary data
Researcher collects themselves ✅ fits needs of experiment ❌ time consuming, costs more
93
Secondary data
Collected by somebody else ✅ saves time, saves money ❌ not be appropriate for needs of study
94
Critical value
A critical value is a figure in a table of critical values that the answer from an inferential statistical test is compared with to check if the findings are statistically significant
95
Ranking
Test scores would be assigned a number, using rank 1 for the lowest score, rank 2 for the next score and so on for both the maths test and the physics test (but each set of scores ranked separately to each other).
96
Internal validity
Is the study measuring what it intends to within the study itself?
97
External validity
The extent that the results from a study that can be generalised beyond the current study
98
Independent variable
This is the variable/thing that the researcher wants to change (manipulate) to see what effect is has on something else.
99
Dependent variable
The variable the researcher measures.
100
Extraneous variables
Any variables controlled by the researcher.
101
Confounding variable
Any variables NOT controlled by the researcher that could ruin the results