Research Methods Flashcards
(154 cards)
1
Q
Research methods
A
The means by which explanations are tested
2
Q
Experimental method
A
A research method method using random allocation of participants and the manipulation of variables to determine cause and effect
3
Q
Independent variable (IV)
A
The factor manipulated by researchers in an investigation
4
Q
Dependent variable (DV)
A
The factor measured by the researcher in an investigation
5
Q
Operationalisation of variables
A
The process of defining variables into measurable factors
6
Q
Extraneous variables (EV)
A
Variables other than the IV that might affect the DV
7
Q
Extraneous variable factors
A
- Guessing the purpose of research and trying to please researcher by giving the ‘right results
- “”trying to annoy the researcher by giving the wrong results called the screw you effect
- Acting unnaturally out of nervousness or fear if evaluation
- Acting unnaturally due to social desirability bias
8
Q
Single blind procedure
A
Teaching that reduces demand characteristics, involves ppts having no idea which condition of a study they are in
9
Q
Participant variables
A
Concerns factors such as ppts age and intelligence
10
Q
Situational variables
A
Concern the experimental setting and surrounding environment eg temp and noise levels
11
Q
Experimenter variable
A
Concerns in the personality, appearance and conduct of the researcher, eg female researcher may gain different results to a male one
12
Q
Confounding variables
A
Uncontrolled extraneous variables that negatively affect results
13
Q
Control
A
Random allocation and counterbalancing, randomisation and standardisation
14
Q
Random allocation
A
All individuals in sample have equal chance of getting picked, decreases systematic error so individual difference in responses/ ability are far less likely to consistently affect results
15
Q
Counterbalancing
A
Method used to deal with extraneous effects when using repeated measures design
ABBA
Half do Condition A followed by Condition B
Other half Condition B followed by Condition A
Order effects BALANCED OUT by the opposing half of ppts
16
Q
Randomisation
A
Used in presentation of trails to avoid any systematic error that the order of the trails might present
17
Q
Standardisation
A
Refers to the process in which procedures used in research are kept the same
18
Q
Demand characteristic
A
Features of a piece of reseats which allows an ppt to work out aim or hypothesis. Ppts May then change their behaviour and so frustrate the aim of the research
19
Q
Investigator effects
A
A researcher effect where researcher influence ppts response
20
Q
Factors affecting investigator effects
A
Physical characteristics- age or ethnicity
Less obvious personal characteristics- tone of voice
Investigator may be unconsciously bias in their interpretation of data and find what they expect to find
Double blind
21
Q
Double blind
A
Procedure to reduce investigator effects, neither ppts or investigator knows what condition ppts are in
22
Q
Laboratory experiment
A
Experiment conducted in a control environment allowing the establishment of causality
23
Q
Adv and Dis of laboratory experiment
A
Adv High degree of control Replication Cause and effect Isolation of variables
Dis Experimenter bias Problems operationalising the IV and DV Low external (ecological) validity Demand characteristics
24
Q
Field experiment
A
Experiment conducted in a naturalistic environment where the researchers manipulate the independent variable
25
Natural experiment
An experiment where the independent variable varies naturally
26
Quasi experiment
Where the researcher is unable to freely manipulate the independent variable or randomly allocate ppts to the different conditions
Used when the researcher is interested in independent variables that cannot be randomly assigned
27
Adv and Dis of field and natural experiments
Adv
High ecological validity
No demand characteristics
```
Dis
Less control
Replication
Ethics
Sample bias
```
28
Observational techniques
Involves watching and recording behaviour
Most observations are naturalistic (occurs in real world setting)
Control conditions eg Milgrams 1963
29
Types of observations
Participant observation
-observed become activity involved in situation being studied to gain a more hands on perspective eg Zimbardo’s
Non participant observations
-involves researchers not become actively involved in the behaviour being studied eg Ainsworth strange situation
30
Overt and covert
Overt - where participants are aware they are being observed eg zimbardo 1971
Covert - where participants remain unaware of being observed eg festinger 1957) study where he infiltrated a cult who were prophesying the end of the world
31
Adv and dis of observational techniques
Adv
High external validity
Practical method
Few demand characters
```
Dis
Cause and effect
Observer bias
Replication
Ethics
Practical problems
```
32
Sampling procedures
Event sampling - counting the number of times a behaviour occurs in a target individual/s
Time sampling - counting behaviour in a set time frame eg recording what behaviour is being exhibited every 30 seconds
33
Behaviour categories
When conducting stricter observations, psychologists have to decide which specific behaviours should be examined, operationalise the behaviour through the use of behaviour categories
34
Inter rater reliability
Where observers consistently code behaviour in the same way
35
Self report techniques
Participants giving info about themselves without researcher interference
36
Questionnaire
Self report method where ppt record their own answers to a pre set list of questions
37
Questionnaires - types of questions
Closed (fixed questions) - involves yes/no answers - easy to quantity but restrict answers
Open questions - allow ppts to answer in their own words. There are more difficult to analyse but allow freedom of expression and greater depth of answers
38
Adv and Dis Questionnaires
```
Adv
Quick
Lack of investigator effects
Quantitative and qualitative analysis
Replication
```
```
Dis
Misunderstanding
Biased sample
Low response rate
Superficial issues
Social desirability
```
39
Questionnaire construction
```
Aim
Length
Previous questions
Pilot study
Measurement scale
```
40
Interviews
Self report method where participants answer questions in face to face situations
41
Types of interviews
Structured - identical closed questions, interviewers do not need much training
Unstructured - informal discussion on a particular topic, asking follow up questions. Interviewers need training and skill
Semi structured - combining both producing quantitative and qualitative
42
Adv and Dis interviews
```
Adv
Complex issues
Waste misunderstandings
Data analysis
Replication
```
```
Dis
Interviews effects
Interview training
Ethical issues
Participant answers
```
43
Design of interviews
Gender and age
Ethnicity
Personal characteristics and adapted role
44
Correlational studies
The factors measured in a correlational study to assess their direction and strength of relationships
45
Co- variable
The variables investigated in a correlation
46
Positive n negative correlation
P- occurs when one co variable increases as another co variable increases
N- when one co variable increases with another co variable decreases
47
Scattergrams
Type of graphs used to display the extent to which two variables are correlated
48
Adv and Dis of correlational analysis
Strength
Allows predictions to be made
Allows quantification of relationships
No manipulation
```
Weaknesses
Quantification problem
Cause and effect
Extraneous relationships
Only works for linear relationships
```
49
Case studies
In depth detailed investigation of one individual or small group
50
Case studies Adv and Dis
Adv
Rich detail
Sometimes only possible method
Useful for theory contraction
Dis
Not representative
Researcher bias
Reliance on memory
51
Difference between experiment and correlation
E- isolated and maniples IV to observe its effect on DV and controls environment (EV) Establish cause and effect
C- identified variables and looks for a relationship between them
52
Scientific process
Aim is precise statement of why a study is taking place
| Hypothesis is a precise, testable prediction
53
The experimental/ alternative hypothesis
Predicts that differences in the DV will be beyond the boundaries of chance ( they will occur as a result of manipulation of IV)
54
The null hypothesis
Is ‘the hypothesis of no differences’ predicts that he IV will not affect the DV
55
Directional (one tailed) hypothesis
Predicts the direction of the results eg significant reduction in speed of reaction times as a result of caffeine consumption
56
Non directional (two tailed)
Predicts there will be a difference but does not predict the direction of the results
57
Example of hypothesis
There is a difference in number of verbal errors made by ppts who believe there are 5 listeners (small audience) and by ppts who believe there are 100 listeners (large audience)
58
Sampling
The selection of ppts to represent a wider population
59
Population vs sample
Main difference is to do with how observations are assigned to the data set.
A population includes all of the events from a set of data.
A sample consists of one or more observations drawn from the population
60
Random sampling
Where each member of a population has an equal chance of being selected
61
Adv and Dis random sampling
```
Adv
Unbiased selection
Generalisation
Dis
Impractical
Not representative
```
62
Opportunity sampling
Involves selecting ppts who are available and willing to take part, for example asking people in the street who are passing
63
Adv and Dis opportunity sampling
Adv
Ease of formation
Natural experiments
Dis
Unrepresentative
Self selection
64
Volunteer sampling
People volunteering to participate
65
Adv and Dis volunteer sampling
Adv
Ease of formation
Less chance of screw you effect
Dis
Unrepresentative
Demand characteristics
66
Systematic sampling
Involves taking every nth person from a list to create a sample
67
Adv and Dis of systematic sampling
Adv
Unbiased selection
Generalisation
Dis
Periodic traits
Not representative
68
Stratified sampling
Is a small scale reproduction. Involves dividing a population into characteristics important for research eg age social class
69
Adv and Dis of stratified sample
Adv
Representative
Unbiased
Dis
Knowledge of population characteristics requires
Time consuming
70
Pilot studies
Small scale practice investigation
| Examine the feasibility of an approach that is intended to ultimately be used in a larger scale study
71
Experimental designs
Independent group design
Repeated measures design
Matched pairs design
72
Independent group design
Experimental design in which each participant performs one condition of an experiment
73
Adv and Dis independent group design
Adv
No order effects
Demand characteristics
Time saved
Dis
More participants needed
Group differences
74
Repeated measure design
Experimental design where each ppt performs all conditions of an experiment
75
Adv and Dis Repeated measure design
Adv
Group differences
More data/ fewer participants
```
Dis
Order effects
Counterbalancing
Demand characteristics
Takes more time
```
76
Matched pairs design
Experimental design where ppt are in similar pairs with one of each pair performing each condition
77
Adv and Dis Matched pairs
Adv
No order effects
Demand characteristics
Group differences
Dis
More participants
Matching is difficult
Time consuming
78
Ethical issues
The rules governing the conduct of researchers in investigations
79
Code of ethics include
```
Can Do Can’t Do With Participants
Informed consent
Deception
Confidentially
Debriefing
Withdrawal
Protection from harm
```
80
Observation research
Observations are only made in public places where people might expect to be observed by strangers
81
Incentives to take part
Participants should not be offered bribes or promised readers for their participant as this puts pressure on them to take part
82
Peer reviews
Process takes place before a study is published to ensure that research is of high quality, contributes to the field of research and is accurately presented
Without this, poor research might be disseminated which would damage the integrity of that field of research or that of the disciple as a whole
83
Adv and Dis of peer review
```
Adv
Maintains high standards in research
Helps prevent scientific fraud
Dis
Experts with conflict of interest may not approve finding to save own repulsion
File drawer effect
```
84
Implications of psychology research for the economy
Practical application
Effective therapies, developed through research, making huge savings in financial costs, allowing many people to return to work and contribute more fully to the economy
85
Evaluation of psychologist research for economy
Reduces costs eg psychologically healthy people less likely to incur costs of health services (risk factors)
Psychologists need to be aware that ethical consideration comes before profit, research should no be used to exploit people as this has negative consequences
86
Reliability
The extent to which a test or measurements produces consistent results
87
Types of reliability
Internal reliability
| External reliability
88
Internal reliability
Concerns the extent to which something is consistent within itself eg set of scales should measure same weigh between 50-100g as between 150-200g
89
External reliability
Concerns the extent to which a test measures consistently over time
90
Ways of assessing reliability
Split half method - measures internal reliability but splitting a test into toe and having the same ppt do both halves. If the two halves of the test provide similar results then this indicates the test has internal reliability
Test retest method - measures external validity, giving the same test to the same ppts on two occasions, if same results obtained then reliability is established
Inter rater reliability - is a mean of assessing whether different observers are viewing and rating behaviours the same way
91
Validity
The extent to which results accurately measure what they’re supposed to measure
92
Types of validity
Internal validity
| External validity
93
Internal validity
Concerns whether results are due to manipulation of the IV and have not been affect led by confounding variables - improved by reducing investigator effects, minimising demand characteristics, standardised instructors and random samples
94
External validity
Refers to the extent to which an experimental effect (the results) can be generalised to other settings (ecological validity) other people (population validity) and over time (temporal validity)
Eg milgrams study lacked external validity
95
Ways of assessing validity
Face validity - simple way involves the extent to which items look like what a test claims to measure
Concurrent validity - assessed validity by correlating scores on a test with another test known to be valid
Predictive validity - assessed validity by prediction how well a test predicts future behaviour
Temporal validity - assessed to what degree research findings remain true over time
96
Scientific process
A means of acquiring knowledge based on observable measurable evidence
97
Scientific process method
Replicability - being able to repeat a study to check the validity of the results
Objectivity - observation made without bias
Falsification - that scientific statements are capable to be proven wrong
98
Paradigm
Consists of the basic assumptions, ways of thinking and methods of stuffy that are commonly accepted by members of a discipline or group
99
Paradigm shift + phases
Revolutionary changes in scientific assumptions
1) Inductive phase - observations yield info that is used to formulate theories as explanations
2) Deductive phase - predictions made from theories in the form of testable hypotheses, are tested and yield data that is analysed, leading to theory adjustments
100
What should be in a lab report
1. Title page
2. Abstract (last)
3. Intro
4. Method
5. Results
6. Discussion
7. References
101
Title page
Indicate what the study is about, must include IV and DV
| Shouldn’t be written as a question
102
Abstract
Write it last, provides concise and comprehensive summary of a research report
- Aim and rationale
- describe ppts and setting 5W
- describe method, what design, questionnaires or tests used
- Describe major findings statistics + significance
- contribution to knowledge (PA)
103
Introduction
Explain where hypothesis comes from
-general theory inc topic
-narrow down to specific and relevant theory
-logical progression of ideas, studies outlined lead to aims and hypothesis
AIM included in this para
HYPOTHESIS state the alternative hypothesis and make it clear inc variables
104
Method
```
Assume reader has no knowledge - so they could replicate it
Past tense
Don’t justify
Subheadings
-Design
-Participants
-Materials
-Procedure
```
105
Results
Present the descriptive statistics followed by inferential statistics, don’t interpret results
Don’t include raw data
2dp
Significant or not
106
Discussion
```
Outline your findings
Compare results to background material
How confident can you be in the results, acknowledge limitations only if they can explain results obtained (not necessary)
Constructive ways to improve
Implications
Idea for further research
Concluding paragraph
```
107
Reference
Books:
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of work. Location: Publisher
Journal articles
Author, A. A., Author, B. B., Author, C. C. (Year). Article title. Journal Title, volume number(issue number), page numbers
108
Types of data
Quantitative - data occurring in numerical form
Qualitative - non numerical data expressing meanings, feelings and descriptions
109
Primary data
First hand research, done by the research, through data collected on his participants that’s never been published before
110
Secondary research
Data originally collected towards another research aim which has been published before
111
Meta analysis
A process in which a large number of studies which involve the same research within and methods of research are reviewed together and the combined data is tested by statistical techniques to assess the effect size
112
Content analysis
Method of quantifying qualitative data through the use of coding units
113
Adv and Dis of content analysis
```
Adv
Ease of application
Complements other methods
Reliability
Dis
Descriptive
Flawed results
Lack of causality
```
114
Thematic analysis
A method of qualitative research that involves analysing data to identify patterns within it
115
Descriptive statistics
Provides summary of a set of data
| Includes measures of central tendency and measures of dispersion
116
Measures of central tendency
Methods do estimating mod point scores in set of data
Median
Mean
Mode
117
Median and Adv/Dis
```
Central score in a list of ranked ordered scores
Adv
Not affected by extreme freak scores
Easy to calculate
Dis
Not as sensitive as the mean
Unrepresentative
```
118
Mean and Adv/Dis
Midpoint of the combined values of a set of data and calc by adding up all scores then dividing by total number of scores
Adv
Most sensitive measure of central tendency (accurate)
Uses all data
Dis
Less useful is some scores are skewed
Mean score my not be one of the actual scores
119
Mode and Adv/Dis
Most common number in a set of scores
Adv
Less prone to distortion by extreme values
Makes more sense then other measures eg average number of children is 2 not 2.5
Dis
Can be more then one mode
Doesn’t use all of the scores
120
Measures of dispersion
Measurement of the spread of scores within a set of data
The variability of scores
Range
Standard deviation
121
Range and Adv/Dis
Calculated by subtracting lowest value from highest value in set of data
Adv
Fairly easy and quick
Takes full account of extreme values
Can be distorted by exerted freak values
Does not show if data are clustered Or spread evenly
122
Standard deviation
Measure of the variability of a set of data, larger the SD the larger the spread of the scores
Calc
1)Add up all scores together and divide by number of scores to calculate mean
2)Subtract the mean from each individual score
3)Square each of these scores
4)Add all the squares scores together
5)Divide the sum of by the number of scores minus 1 (this is the variance)
6)Use a calculator to work put square root of the variance
123
Standard deviation Adv and Dis
Adv
More sensitive dispersion measure than the range since all scores calculated
Allows for the interpretation of individual scores m
Dis
More complicated to calculate
Less meaningful of data are not normally distributed
124
Percentages
Types do descriptive statistics that show the rate, number or amount of something within every 100, can be plotted on a pie chart
125
Bar charts
Shows data in for or categories to be compared like males and female scores conceding chocolate consumption
Categories X axis (hori)
Amount Y axis (vert)
126
Histogram
Similar to bar chart, main difference is histograms used for continuous data such as test scores
Continuous Scores - X axis (hori)
Frequency of these scores - Y axis (vert)
No space between bars
127
Pie chart
Used to show the freq of categories as percentages
128
Results/ data tables
Result: Summarise the main findings
Often uses Measure of dispersion and central tendency
Data tables presents raw unprocessed scores
129
Normal distribution
Data with an evenly distribution of scores either side of the mean
130
Skewed distribution
Data that does not have an even distribution of scores either side of the mean
131
How to check if it’s normally distributed
Examine visually - look at the data to see if most scores are clustered around the mean
Calculate measures to central tendency - calc mean mode and median to see if similar
Plot the frequency distribution - plot the data on a histogram to see if it forms a bell shaped curve
132
Causes of skewed distribution
Outliers (extreme freak scores)
Positive skewed : occurs when there is a high extreme score/s
Negative skewed : occurring when there is a low extreme score/s
133
Sign test
A non parametric statistical test used for experiments where data is at least nominal and a repeated measures design has been used
134
Correlation coefficient
Correlation study produces it
‘A numerical value showing the degree to which two co variables are related
Range from +1 perfect positive correlation to -1 perfect negative correlation
Little correlation will be near to zero
Data from correlation analysed by spearmans rho and pearsons
135
Inferential testing
Statistical procedures that makes predictions about populations from mathematical analysis of data taken from a sample
136
How to decide what inferential test needs to be used
1) whether a difference or relationship between 2 sets of data is being tested for
2) what level of measurement the data is (nominal, ordinal and interval/ratio
3) what design has been used : IGD, RMD(inc MPD)
137
Levels of measurement
NOIR
Nominal data
Ordinal data
Interval/ratio
138
Nominal
Involves counting frequency data eg how many days of week were rainy or sunny
Tally charts used to record data
Nominal data crudest, most uninformative eg does tell us how many hours sunny
139
Ordinal
Involves ranking data into place order with rating scales often being used to achieve this
More informative than nominal but lacks being fully informative eg athletes finishing places in race 1st, 2nd ... but doesn’t Inform the distances between individuals
Similarly one persons subjective rating of 7 may be very different to another rating of 7
140
Interval / Ratio
Standardised measurement units like time, weight, temp abs distances are interval/ratio measurements
Most informative and accurate as they use equal measurement intervals
141
Probability
The likelihood is events being determined by chance
142
Type | and type || errors
| when a difference / relationship in a data set is accepted as a real one but in fact is not
Eg significance level has been set too high so null hypothesis is wrongly rejected
|| when a difference / relationship in a data set is rejected but actually does exist
Eg significance levels been set too low
Null hypothesis wrongly rejected
143
Sign test
Used when a difference is predicted between two sets of data, the data is of at least nominal nature and RMD has been used
144
Chi squared
Used when a difference is predicted between two sets of data, data is at least of nominal and IGD has been used, Chi squared as a test of association (relationship)
145
Mann whitney
Used when a difference is predicted between two sets of data, data at least ordinal level and IGD has been used
146
Wilcoxon signed matched ranks
Used when a difference is predicted to occur between two sets of data, data at least ordinal level and RMD or MPD has been used
147
Independent (unrelated) t-test
Used when a difference is predicted between two sets of data, data is normally distributed data is of interval/ ratio level and IGD has been used
148
Repeated (related) t-test
Used when a difference is predicted between two sets of data, data is normally distributed data is of interval/ ratio level and A RMD or MPD has been used
149
Spearmans rho
Used when a relationship (correlation) is predicted between two sets of data, the data is of at least ordinal level and the data are pairs of scores from the same person or event
150
Pearson product moment
Used when a relationship (correlation) is predicted between two sets of data, the data is of at least interval/ratio level and the data are pairs of scores from the same person or event
151
One tailed or two tailed
A one tailed test is where you are only interested in one direction. Of a mean is x, you might want to know if set of results is more or less than x. A one tailed is more powerful than a two tailed test as you aren’t considering an effect in opposite direction
One- directional
Two - non directional
152
Tests that need observed value to be equal or less than the critical value to be accepted, allowing null hypothesis to be rejected
Mann whitney
Wilcoxon
Sign test
153
Tests that need observed value to be equal or greater than the critical value to be accepted, allowing null hypothesis to be rejected
```
Chi squared
Independent (unrelated) t-test
Repeated (related) t-test
Spearmans rho
Pearson product moment
```
154
How to remember inferential tests
I Read Comics
Naughty Children Swear Continuously
Only Men Want Sausages
Reading Usually Raises Psychology marks
