research methods Flashcards

(56 cards)

1
Q

what is primary data

A

researcher collects for themselves, first hand, timely and costly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is secondary data

A

data that already exists, quick and cheap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is q’n data

A

data in numerical form, favoured by positivists. tend to be large scale
find correlations and cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is q’l data

A

data on a smaller scale, more in-depth. empathy, versthn = to get meanings and motives. favoured by interpretivists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

practical: RM

A
  • time and money: large scale surveys need staff that’s costs a lot
  • personal characteristics: of the researcher can affect the study
  • subject matter: harder to study diff groups. eg. male researcher w a female group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ethical: RM

A
  • consent: p’s can refuse. c needs to be obtained.
  • confidentiality: p’s identity kept anon to avoid negative backlash
  • protection from harm: r should protect p from harm and understand potential effects on p
  • vulnerability: age, disability. DA victims need rapport, dobash and dobash
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

theoretical: RM

A

representative: if the study is typical of others then an assumption can be made. q’n= positivists.
reliable: consistency of results. q’n=positivists.
validity: true and genuine picture. true reflection?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

eg of unethical study

A

humphrey’s tearoom trade

  • pretended to be gay and find out about casual sex in male toilets
  • got license plates for name and address
  • went back a year later disguised for interview
  • deception, exploitation, illegal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

aims and hypothesis

step one of research process

A

hypothesis: an explanation that can be tested by evidence to prove it true/false
- gets cause and effect
- q’n methods
- positivists

aim: identifies what we need to find/intend to study
- meanings and motives
- actors pov
- intepretivists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

operationalising concepts

step two of research process

A

•before a concept in a RM can be studied, it needs to be defined so that everyone understands what it means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

pilot study

step three of research process

A

•small scale of real study

  • avoids wasting time and money
  • checks all questions
  • determines whether research goes ahead
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

samples/sampling

step four of research process

A

-sociologists make a sample of pop. to make it representative and allows generalisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

types of sampling

A

target pop=the group the R is interested in
sampling frame=relevant members of the research pop
sample= smaller sample from large pop
sampling unit= members within the pop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

types of questionnaires

A

face to face
telephone
postal
internet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

adv and disadv of face to face

A

adv- interviewer can clarify meaning

disadv- expensive, time consuming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

adv and disadv of telephone

A

adv- high response rate, cheap

disadv- time consuming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

face to face and telephone questionnaires are ?

A

structured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

adv and disadv of postal

A

adv- cheap, wide geographical area

disadv- low response rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

adv and disadv of internet

A

adv- cheap, wide geographical area

disadv- low response rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

postal and internet questionnaires are ?

A

self completed, unstructured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

types of questions

A

closed and open

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

brief explanation of closed and open questions

A

closed. adv- collects info quickly, easy to quantity, reliable. disadv- limited response level: positivists.
open. adv- find out meanings and motives, more complex, valid, able to elaborate: interpretivisists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

adv of questionnaires

A
  • reliability: if repeated and similar results

- representative: collects from a large number of ppl, can make generalisations

24
Q

disadv of questionnaires

A
  • response rate: low can be a problem
  • inflexible: w close ended questions
  • practical: data can be limited
25
types of interviews
structured, semi structured, unstructured and group
26
briefly explain structured interview
simply a questionnaire adv- high response rate, cheap and easy, representative/reliable disadv- lacks validity, no rapport POSITIVISTS
27
eg of structured interview
•willmott and young- 933 people. - representative - questions are precise - response rate : 100%
28
briefly explain semi structured interview
-same question style as structured but interviewer can probe INTERPRETIVISTS
29
briefly explain unstructured interviews
more of a convo, open questions. q’l adv- rapport, flexibility, valid disadv- not representative, not reliable
30
eg of unstructured interviews
dobash and dobash - 109 ppl for domestic abuse - interview length=2-12 hours - rapport and empathetic understanding
31
briefly explain group interviews
involves interviewer and 8-10 people adv- open up, ideas produce good data disadv- peer pressure, one person domination
32
types of observations
participant, non-participant, covert, overt, semi structured and structured
33
what is participant observation
researcher is involved in ALL of activities carried out the group
34
what is non participant observation
researcher stands apart from all activities
35
what is covert observation
subject will be unaware of researcher’s identity and purpose
36
what is overt observation
researcher reveals their identity
37
what is semi structured observation
observer records what they find and experience what they can
38
what is structured observation
researcher systematically observed bhv and logs it into categories
39
adv of observations
* validity: true and genuine * subjectivity: empathy * trust: based on rapport * flexible: no restrain
40
disadv of observations
* time and money: practical issues * personal characteristics: can affect the group * loss of objectivity:going native * validity: background info? * can’t quantity data * not reliable or representative
41
types of experiments
lab experiments, field experiments, thought experiments
42
explain lab experiments
controlled conditions, establishes cause and effect. iv- cause. dv-effect zimbardo
43
explain field experiments
natural conditions eg jacobson and rosenthal
44
explain thought experiments
only happens in the mind of the sociologist. doesn’t involve experimenting on ppl. discovers cause and effect
45
os are ?
q’n and secondary
46
types of os
hard- not easily manipulated | soft- easily manipulated
47
advantages of os
- readily available and cheap - large sample sizes, representative - govt produce, reliable
48
disadvantages of os
- not all data is reliable, some maybe incorrectly answered - politically biased to govt at the time - invalid, dark figure and soft stats
49
positivists view on os
reliable and representative because they’re quantitative | cause and effect
50
interpretivists view on os
invalid, value laden and subjective
51
marxists view on os
the powerful can control the stats to benefit them
52
what are docs
q’l and secondary
53
types of docs
public- produced by govt depts, schools, businesses etc. available for researchers to use personal- private. first person accounts of social events
54
pawson’s 3 ways to analyse docs
formal content: classifies and quanitifiea the content content: using coding frames to categorise thematic: motives and ideologies
55
adv of docs
- personal docs enable researcher to get close to social actor - cheap: already gathered - allows comparisons to be made
56
disadv of docs
- may not be representative of today’s pop - public docs are v subjective - no way of checking the accuracy