Research Methods Flashcards
What is a laboratory experiment?
A laboratory experiment is a type of experiment carried out in artificial controlled conditions, usually in a lab.
The IV is changed to see the effect on a DV with every other possible variable controlled to see a clear cause and effect.
What are the disadvantages and advantages of a laboratory experiment?
Advantages:
Highly controlled environment allows for a clear cause and effect to be established as confounding variables are removed
Since the experiment is strictly controlled, it is usually more reliable than other experiments
Disadvantages:
Low ecological validity - laboratory experiments are done in artificial conditions and so this cannot be representative of the general population.
Demand characteristics can occur often in laboratory experiments as it’s hard to get someone into an artificial, controlled setting without them even knowing they’re in a study.
What is a Field experiment?
A field experiment is an experiment similar to a laboratory experiment, but done in a natural, less controlled setting.
A field experiment aims to manipulate the IV to find the DV, but in a less controlled setting. These are usually done outside in a natural setting.
What are the disadvantages and advantages of a Field experiment?
Advantages:
Much easier to observe participants without knowing they’re in a study as they are in their normal, natural environment, therefore reducing the chance of demand characteristics.
Ecologically valid, as participants are in a natural setting and so field experiments are often more ecologically valid.
Disadvantages:
Field experiments often risk confounding variables because the environment used is not controlled. Due to this, it can be hard to establish clear cause and effect between 2 variables.
What is a Natural experiment?
A natural experiment is an experiment similar to a field experiment, however the IV is not able to get manipulated by the researchers because they physically can’t.
Researchers wait for the IV to happen to see the effect on the DV.
An example of an IV that can’t be manipulated is a natural disaster - you cannot manipulate it to happen at a certain point.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a Natural experiment?
Advantages:
Compared to a laboratory experiment, it is much easier to study people without knowing they’re in an experiment as this experiment is usually done in a natural setting.
As a result, demand characteristics is less likely.
Ethical - Some things are unethical to be manipulating but with a natural experiment you don’t manipulate anything at all, therefore you’re not being a disturbance.
Ecological validity is extremely high in Natural experiments as the environment they are used in are usually not artificial and so are more representative to the real world.
Disadvantages:
Cause and effect is much harder to establish because you cannot control anything, not even the IV - this means that you are much more likely to run into confounding variables you can’t fix.
As a result, natural experiments aren’t very reliable.
IV can’t be manipulated so researchers have to literally wait for the IV to happen naturally. This can take a while.
What is a Quasi experiment?
A quasi experiment is similar to a laboratory experiment, as it is done in controlled conditions to establish a casual relationship. However:
In a quasi experiment, the researcher is not able to use random allocation to put participants in different conditions.
This is usually because the independent variable is a particular feature of the participant, such as gender or the existence of a mental disorder.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a Quasi experiment?
Advantages:
Quasi experiments are often done in controlled conditions. This means that cause and effect is easily established.
This also means that the study is more reliable as confounding variables are eliminated.
Disadvantages:
Depending on the IV, Quasi experiments can be potentially ecologically invalid.
For example, if your IV is a mental illness, people may act much differently in an artificial environment, making cause and effect much less representative of the population with the same illness.
Cause and effect is harder to establish as you cannot directly manipulate the IV to your best interests.
You are not able to randomly allocate participants to each condition in an experiment.
This is because you are looking for certain unique participants, and to get a proper sample you may need to look outside your target population.
As a result of this, confounding variables may occur between the participants as the location at where the participant was raised would vary.
The way you are raised might cause confounding variables when trying to conclude cause and effect within the participants, therefore making quasi experiments less representative.
What is a Research Aim?
A general statement about what the researcher intends to investigate; the purpose of the study.
Dave, a middle-aged male researcher, approached an adult in a busy street. He asked the adult for directions to the train station. He repeated this with 29 other adults.
Each of the 30 adults were then approached by a second researcher, called Sam, who showed each of them 10 photographs of different middle-aged men, including a photograph of Dave.
Sam asked the 30 adults to choose the photograph of the person who had asked them for directions to the train station.
Sam estimated the age of each of the 30 adults and recorded whether each one had correctly chosen the photograph of Dave.
Identify one aim of this experiment.
The aim of the experiment was to:
Observe the effect that age has on the ability to identify a person previously seen from a photo line up.
It is thought that colors might affect our performance when carrying out certain tasks.
Research in this area has been inconclusive. Some studies have shown that red improves performance but others have found the opposite. It could be that these contradictory results have arisen because red is beneficial only for certain kinds of mental processing.
Some psychologists tested this hypothesis in a series of independent-groups design experiments using students at a Canadian university.
The experiments involved computer tasks, with either a red, blue or neutral background appearing on the monitor. The researchers found that participants were better at a word-recall task and a spell-checking task when the screen background was red rather than blue or neutral.
However, participants thought of more creative ideas when the screen was blue rather than red or neutral. The researchers concluded that red is beneficial for tasks that require attention to detail whereas blue aids creativity.
What were the researchers’ aims in this study?
The research aim in this study is to investigate the effect background color has on performance and creativity, projecting spell-checking and word-recall tasks onto a computer with a background that was either blue, neutral or red.
The researchers wanted to see how correct and creative the groups would be with the tasks given relating to the color background presented to them.
What is an Independent Variable (IV)?
The Independent Variable is the variable in the experiment that you directly change in order to see the effect on the Dependent Variable.
What is a Dependent Variable (DV)?
The Dependent Variable is the variable in the experiment that researchers are looking to measure, relating to the impact the Independent Variable has on it directly.
For example, the Independent Variable might be the type of pondweed used in water, and the Dependent Variable would be the rate of photosynthesis.
What does it mean to Operationalize something?
Operationalization is a process of defining the measurement of a phenomenon that is not directly measurable.
Which one is Operationalized, and which one isn’t?
1 - Number of words accurately recalled 2 - Resources selected 3 - Punishment given 4 - Reaction time in seconds 5 - Intelligence level 6 - Number of faces accurately recognized
1 - Operationalized 2 - Not Operationalized 3 - Not Operationalized 4 - Operationalized 5 - Not Operationalized 6 - Operationalized
Identify and operationalize the IV and the DV in the following hypotheses:
Male participants will throw a rugby ball further than female participants.
IV = Male or Female DV = Distance the rugby ball is thrown in meters
Identify and operationalize the IV and the DV in the following hypotheses:
Females with an eating disorder will score lower on a self-esteem questionnaire compared to females who do not have an eating disorder.
IV = Eating Disorder diagnosis or no Eating Disorder diagnosis
DV = Number of points scored on questionnaire
Identify and operationalize the IV and the DV in the following hypotheses:
Participants will move more counters when completing a counter moving task on their own compared to when observed by an audience.
IV = Observing audience or no observing audience DV = Amount of counters moved by the participant
A psychologist used an independent groups design to investigate whether or not a cognitive interview was more effective than a standard interview, in recalling information.
For this experiment, participants were recruited from an advertisement placed in a local paper. The advertisement informed the participants that they would be watching a film of a violent crime and that they would be interviewed about the content by a male police officer.
The psychologist compared the mean number of items recalled in the cognitive interview with the mean number recalled in the standard interview.
Identify the independent variable and the dependent variable in this experiment.
Independent Variable = Cognitive interview or standard interview
Dependent variable = Mean number of items recalled from the film of a violent crime
Identify the IV and DV for the following hypothesis:
Older people play more hours of video games in a week than younger people.
IV = Older or younger people
DV = Hours of video games played
What is a hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a statement made by the researcher of an experiment reflecting what they believe as true.
What’s a non-directional hypothesis?
A non-directional hypothesis simply states that there will be a difference between the two groups/conditions but does not say which will be greater/smaller, quicker/slower etc.
What’s a directional hypothesis?
A directional hypothesis is made by the researcher predicting a difference between two different groups in the experiment and stating what the difference will be between them.
For example, students who use a revision guide in a test will score higher marks on the test than students who don’t.
Independent Variables must feature two conditions.
List two conditions of an IV related to how often students use revision guides.
DV = Marks gained in test
State a directional and non-directional hypothesis from these conditions.
IV conditions:
Never
Always
Directional:
Students who always use revision guides will gain more marks on a test than students that never use it.
Non-directional:
There will be a difference in the marks gained on a test between students who always use a revision guide and students that never use them.