research methods ch 10 Flashcards

1
Q

dependent variable/outcome variable

A

how a participant asks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how many dependent variables can an experiment have

A

at least two, could be more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how are the variables shown on a scatterplot

A

the independent variable is almost always not eh x-axis, dependent on the y-axis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

control variable

A

any variable that the experiment holds constant on purpose, not really variables don’t vary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

three rules of causal claims

A

covariance, temporal precedence, internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

comparison group/comparison condition

A

only an experiment can provide, no in our personal experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

control group

A

level of an independent variable that is intended to represent “no treatment” or the natural condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

placebo group/placebo control group

A

when the control group is exposed to an inert treatment such as a sugar pill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

confounds

A

possible alternative explanations, potential threats to internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

design confounds

A

an experimenter’s mistake in designing the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

unsystematic variable

A

if it’s across both groups, not a confound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

selection effect

A

in an experiment, when the kinds of participants in one level of the independent variable are systematically different from those in the other + when participants can choose their own groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

random assignment - simulation

A

up to 98% of the time it creates similar groups with as little as 4 participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

matched groups/matching

A

first measure participants on a particular variable, match up participants in pairs, within that set randomly assign each one to conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

independent-groups design

A

separate groups of participants are place into different levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

within-groups design

A

each person is presented with all levels of the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

posttest-only design

A

participants are randomly assigned to independent variable groups and are tested not eh dependent variable once

18
Q

pretest/posttest design

A

participants are randomly assigned to at least two groups and are tested on the key dependent variable twice, once before and once after exposure to the independent variable

19
Q

when is pretest/posttest used

A

for improvement over time + when researchers want to make sure random assignment made groups equal

20
Q

types of within-groups design

A

repeated-measures design, concurrent-measures design

21
Q

repeated-measures design

A

participants are measured on a dependent variable more than once, after exposure to each level of the independent variable

22
Q

concurrent-measures design

A

participants are exposed to all the levels of an independent variable at roughly the same time, and a single attitudinal or behavior preference is the dependent variable

23
Q

order effects

A

being exposed to one condition first changes how participants react to the later conditions

24
Q

types of order effect

A

practice effects/fatigue effects and carryover effect

25
Q

practice effects/fatigue effects

A

long sequence might lead participants to get better at the task or to get tired or bored toward the end

26
Q

carryover effect

A

some of the contamination carries over from one condition to the other

27
Q

counterbalancing

A

presenting the levels of the independent variable to participants in different sequences

28
Q

how to fix order effects

A

counterbalancing

29
Q

types of counter balancing

A

full counterbalancing, partial counterbalancing, Latin square

30
Q

full counterbalancing

A

all possbile condition orders in a randomized order for every subject

31
Q

partial counterbalancing

A

only some of the possible condition orders are represented, present the condition in a randomized order for every subject

32
Q

Latin square

A

formal system to ensure that every condition appears in each position at least once

33
Q

three disadvantages for within-subject design

A

potential for order effects (no internal validity), might not be possible or practical (learning how to ride a bike), when people see all levels of the independent variable they can change how they normally act

34
Q

demand characteristic/experimental demand

A

a cue that can lead participants to guess the experiment’s hypothesis

35
Q

manipulation check

A

extra dependent variable that researchers can insert into an experiment to convince them that their experimental manipulation worked

36
Q

when is manipulation check most oftenly used

A

when the intention is to make participants think or feel a certain way

37
Q

pilot study

A

a simple study, using a separate group of participants that is completed before (or after) the study of primary interest to confirm the effectiveness of the manipulation

38
Q

how can effect size be expressed

A

in original units or r, also in d (standardized effect size, takes into account both the difference between means and the spread of scores within each group - when d is large, the independent variable caused a large change)

39
Q

when are original units useful

A

when you want to estimate the real-world impact

40
Q

when is d useful

A

when you want to compare the results found in one study to a body of knowledge