research methods ch 10 Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

dependent variable/outcome variable

A

how a participant asks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how many dependent variables can an experiment have

A

at least two, could be more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how are the variables shown on a scatterplot

A

the independent variable is almost always not eh x-axis, dependent on the y-axis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

control variable

A

any variable that the experiment holds constant on purpose, not really variables don’t vary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

three rules of causal claims

A

covariance, temporal precedence, internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

comparison group/comparison condition

A

only an experiment can provide, no in our personal experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

control group

A

level of an independent variable that is intended to represent “no treatment” or the natural condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

placebo group/placebo control group

A

when the control group is exposed to an inert treatment such as a sugar pill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

confounds

A

possible alternative explanations, potential threats to internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

design confounds

A

an experimenter’s mistake in designing the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

unsystematic variable

A

if it’s across both groups, not a confound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

selection effect

A

in an experiment, when the kinds of participants in one level of the independent variable are systematically different from those in the other + when participants can choose their own groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

random assignment - simulation

A

up to 98% of the time it creates similar groups with as little as 4 participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

matched groups/matching

A

first measure participants on a particular variable, match up participants in pairs, within that set randomly assign each one to conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

independent-groups design

A

separate groups of participants are place into different levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

within-groups design

A

each person is presented with all levels of the independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

posttest-only design

A

participants are randomly assigned to independent variable groups and are tested not eh dependent variable once

18
Q

pretest/posttest design

A

participants are randomly assigned to at least two groups and are tested on the key dependent variable twice, once before and once after exposure to the independent variable

19
Q

when is pretest/posttest used

A

for improvement over time + when researchers want to make sure random assignment made groups equal

20
Q

types of within-groups design

A

repeated-measures design, concurrent-measures design

21
Q

repeated-measures design

A

participants are measured on a dependent variable more than once, after exposure to each level of the independent variable

22
Q

concurrent-measures design

A

participants are exposed to all the levels of an independent variable at roughly the same time, and a single attitudinal or behavior preference is the dependent variable

23
Q

order effects

A

being exposed to one condition first changes how participants react to the later conditions

24
Q

types of order effect

A

practice effects/fatigue effects and carryover effect

25
practice effects/fatigue effects
long sequence might lead participants to get better at the task or to get tired or bored toward the end
26
carryover effect
some of the contamination carries over from one condition to the other
27
counterbalancing
presenting the levels of the independent variable to participants in different sequences
28
how to fix order effects
counterbalancing
29
types of counter balancing
full counterbalancing, partial counterbalancing, Latin square
30
full counterbalancing
all possbile condition orders in a randomized order for every subject
31
partial counterbalancing
only some of the possible condition orders are represented, present the condition in a randomized order for every subject
32
Latin square
formal system to ensure that every condition appears in each position at least once
33
three disadvantages for within-subject design
potential for order effects (no internal validity), might not be possible or practical (learning how to ride a bike), when people see all levels of the independent variable they can change how they normally act
34
demand characteristic/experimental demand
a cue that can lead participants to guess the experiment's hypothesis
35
manipulation check
extra dependent variable that researchers can insert into an experiment to convince them that their experimental manipulation worked
36
when is manipulation check most oftenly used
when the intention is to make participants think or feel a certain way
37
pilot study
a simple study, using a separate group of participants that is completed before (or after) the study of primary interest to confirm the effectiveness of the manipulation
38
how can effect size be expressed
in original units or r, also in d (standardized effect size, takes into account both the difference between means and the spread of scores within each group - when d is large, the independent variable caused a large change)
39
when are original units useful
when you want to estimate the real-world impact
40
when is d useful
when you want to compare the results found in one study to a body of knowledge