rfbt Flashcards
X received Php1,000 from Y which needs to be repaid in 90 days. In this situation:
Statement I: X is the active subject while Y is the active subject;
Statement II: The prestation involves doing something; and,
Statement III: The efficient cause or juridical tie is the law.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
B. All are false.
Active Subject- (Y) Passive (X): repaid in 90 days ; Contract
D was driving a bus owned by X. D tried to outrun a jeepney which had cut through the lane, but crashed into a car privately owned and driven by C. As result, the passengers in both the bus and car were all either killed or injured. Both vehicles were insured by ABC Insurance Corp. In this situation:
Statement I: The injured passengers may separately claim damages from their respective drivers based on contract;
Statement II: C may be able to claim damages from both D and X liable based on an act or omission punished by law; and,
Statement III: The heirs of the deceased passengers of the car may file suit against the X based on quasi-delict.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
C. Only two are true.
Delay or default is non-fulfillment of an obligation with respect to time. More paticluarly: Statement
I: Mora solved is delay on the part of the debtor; Statement II: Mora Accipiendi is delay on the part of the creditor; and, Statement III: compensation morae is default of both parties in any
obligation.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false
C. Only two are true.
Article 1170 of the Civil Code provides for the sources of liability for damages, such as:
Statement
I: Dolo causante; Statement II: Mora Solvendi; and, Statement III: Culpa contractual.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
C. Only two are true.
The Civil Code provides as a rule that no person shall be liable for fortuitous events and the corresponding loss of the thing shall extinguish the obligation to give, except:
Statement I: when the debtor has incurred delay;
Statement II: when the obligation involves the assumption of risk; and,
Statement III: when the debt is a result of a criminal offense.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
A. All are true.
The Civil Code provides a condition is a future and uncertain event which may result in the demandability or extinguishment of an obligation. The following are valid conditional obligations:
Statement I: X will give Php1M if A does not swim to the earth’s core;
Statement II: X will give Php1M if A’s ticket are does not win in the lottery; and,
Statement III: X will give Php1M if A’s marriage proposal is declined by B.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
A. All are true.
The Civil Code provides a “day certain” is that which must necessarily come, although it may not be known when. The following are valid obligations with a period:
Statement I: X will give Php1M when A celebrates her 100th birthday;
Statement II: X will give Php1M when A dies ahead of B; and,
Statement III: X will give Php1M when X recovers from his severe financial difficulties.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false
D. Only two are false
A, B and C are solidarily liable to X for Php18,000 in 1:2:3 proportion, subject to the following stipulations: A’s share is payable on demand, B’s share is payable on the last day of the next year’s October LECPA, and C’s share is due is X’s son gets accredited as an accounting teacher. In relation thereto:
Statement I: X may demand Php3000 anytime from A, but may only demand the same amount from either B or C when the respective stipulations are fulfilled;
Statement II: Upon arrival of the last day of next year’s LECPA, X may demand Php6,000 from either A or B, but may only demand from the same amount from C only upon fulfillment of the related stipulation; and,
Statement III: Upon X’s son is accredited as an accounting teacher, X may demand Php9,000 from any of the solidary debtors.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
B. All are false.
X has on obligation to give Php5M, which is secured by a specific horse also worth 5M, to A on July 31 of the current year. On the other hand, A is indebted to X for Php5M due on or before August 31 of the current year. Consider the following:
Statement I: If the horse suddenly dies on July 30, A can decide that the parties will no longer receive anything from each other due to extinguishment of their obligations;
Statement II: On July 31, A can choose not to pay and claim that the obligation as already extinguished; and,
Statement III: If on July 31, X offers the horse as payment instead of the cash and A accepts, the latter can them claim compensation so the parties will no longer have to perform their obligations.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
C. Only two are true.
D owes P2200 to C which is payable in eleven monthly installments beginning the end of the current month. In this case:
Statement I. D can use coins in denominations of 0.01 to 0.25 to pay only if C agrees to accept payment in such a manner;
Statement II. D can use coins in denominations of 1.00 to 20.00 only if C does not object to such payment; or,
Statement III. D can use BSP Bank Notes to pay with or without C’s consent thereto.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
D. Only two are false.
Consent is manifested by the meeting of the offer, which is certain, and the acceptance, which must
be absolute, upon the thing and the cause which are to constitute the contract. In relation thereto, consider the following:
Statement I. If at the time of making the offer or acceptance one of the parties was insane, the resulting contract is void; Statement II. If before the acceptance is conveyed to the offeror, either of the parties becomes insane, the resulting contract is voidable; and,
Statement III. If after the acceptance is conveyed to the offeror, either of the parties becomes insane, the resulting contract is unenforceable.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false
B. All are false.
Three of the following contracts are void:
Statement I: A contract of pledge where the thing pledged remained with the pledgor;
Statement II: Sale of large cattle which does not follow the prescribed form; and,
Statement III: An undertaking to donate one’s kidneys to science in the event of death.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
C. Only two are true.
S, a minor, orally sold his only iPad Pro for Php50,000 to B, a demented person, during the latter’s lucid interval. The down payment of Php12,500 was paid at the point of perfection. In this situation:
Statement I: The contract is valid;
Statement II: Only one of the parties may file a case to nullify the contract; and/or,
Statement III: Either party may sue the other to compel performance of their respective obligations in case of breach.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
A. All are true.
Three of the following may objects of contracts: Statement I: All things which are not within the commerce of man; Statement II: All rights which are not transmissible; and, Statement III: All
services which are contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order or public policy.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
B. All are false.
Consider the following:
Statement I: Republic Act 386 recognizes both nominate and innominate contracts;
Statement II: Do ut des (I give that you may give) is a nominate contract; and,
Statement III: Facio u facias (I do that you may do) is an innominate contract.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
A. All are true.
Three of the following contracts are defective: Statement I: A court-approved sale by the guardian of a minor of property worth Php100,000 for a selling price of Php60,000; Statement II: Sale by
a mature-looking minor who pretended to be 25 years old of property worth Php100,000 for a selling price of Php600,000; and, Statement III: Sale of a minor for a selling price of Php6M in
consideration for a better life for the said minor.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false
D. Only two are false
The following contracts are valid: Statement I: Sale of an son’s prospective share in the net worth his dying father; Statement II: Sale of a car that is still to be manufactured the seller; and,
Statement III: Sale of a kidney the proceeds of which are earmarked for a new iPhone.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
D. Only two are false.
The following contracts are valid: Statement I: Sale of car on behalf of another without the latter’s consent; Statement II: Sale of a car that is still to be bought by the seller from a third person; and, Statement III: A contract of sale of a car where the true intention of the parties is to transfer it gratuitously.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
A. All are true.
In the rules on interpretation of contracts: Statement I. If the words of the contract are clear and leave no doubt on the intention of the parties, interpretation of contracts may be proper; Statement
II. In case of gratuitous contracts, doubts shall be resolved in favor of greatest reciprocity of interest; and, Statement III. In onerous contracts, the least transmission of rights and interests shall prevail.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false.
B. All are false.
Consider the following: Statement I. Mutual error as to the legal effect of an agreement when the
purpose of the parties is frustrated may result in the reformation of the instrument; Statement II.
Mutual mistake of the parties and the instrument does not express the true agreement will make
the contract voidable; and, Statement III. Mutual confusion as to the terms of the offer and acceptance will have no effect on the contract.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false
B. All are false.
X bought a residential house from ABC Realty Corp. for a total contract price of Php6M and made
a down payment of Php600,000 and the remainder is to be paid in equal monthly installments of Php50,000. Consider the following: Statement I. If X had paid a total of Php1,200,000, he would be entitled to a grace period of not less than 60days; Statement II. If X had paid a total of
Php3,600,000, he would be entitled to a Php1,800,000; Statement III. If X had paid a total of
Php5,400,000, he would be entitled to Php3,510,000.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false
A. All are true.
The Realty Installment Buyer Act or Maceda Law if Official designated as Republic Act No.:
A. 6550
B. 6551
C. 6552
D. 6553
C. 6552
The price in a contract of sale is certain if: Statement I. the price fixed at the closing price of
Meralco Shares on the last trading day of this week; Statement II. the price is pegged to the value of the one ounce of gold; Statement III. if the price if fixed by the seller.
A. All are true.
B. All are false.
C. Only two are true.
D. Only two are false
C. Only two are true.
Hamzi, an American citizen based in the USA, went to the Philippines for a vacation. While in
Boracay, she met went on a drinking spree and eventually met Jay, a bartender. While under a
state of drunkenness, Hamzi orally agreed to buy and paid via check the land of Jay in Boracay for P5,000,000, when its fair market value was P500,000 only. Upon receipt of the check, Jay immediately handed over the Transfer Certificate of Title to Hamzi. What is the status of the contract?
A. Rescissible
B. Voidable
C. Unenforceable
D. Void
D. Void