Rights and Responsibilities Flashcards
(41 cards)
Church definition
The community of Christians (with a small c it means a Christian place of worship).
Conscience definition
An inner feeling of the rightness or wrongness of an action.
The Decalogue definition
The Ten Commandments.
Democratic processes definition
The ways in which all citizens can take part in government (usually through elections).
Electoral processes definition
The ways in which voting is organised.
The Golden Rule definition
The teaching of Jesus that you should treat others as you would like them to treat you.
Human rights definition
The rights and freedoms to which everyone is entitled.
Political party definition
A group which tries to be elected into power on the basis of its policies (e.g. Labour, Conservative).
Pressure group definition
A group formed to influence government policy on a particular issue.
Situation Ethics definition
The idea that Christians should base moral decisions on what is the most loving thing to do.
Social change definition
The way in which society has changed and is changing (and also the possibilities for future change).
Bible definition
The holy book of Christians.
How do Christians make moral decisions?
- The Bible
- Church teachings (Pope, Archbishop of Canterbury)
- Conscience
- Situation Ethics (what would Jesus do?)
Christians SHOULD only use the Bible
- Fundamentalist Christians believe that the Bible is the literal word of God and he speaks to them directly through the Bible. Also that the Bible has no errors. They believe in miracles and want to go back to the fundamentals (basics) of Christianity.
- It contains rules accepted in society for example, the Decalogue. It has laws such as ‘do not murder’ and ‘do not steal’.
- It contains Jesus’ teachings and what he would do in moral situations. E.g. The Good Samaritan “treat others as you would like to be treated”.
- The bible is not influenced by present culture and society. E.g. Evangelical and Roman Catholic Christians believe homosexual relations are condemned by God.
Christians should NOT only use the Bible
- Liberal Christians believe that, although inspired by God, the Bible was written by humans and therefore needs to be seen in the context of history. The OT is about promoting monotheism over polytheism. Noah’s flood is based on the Babylonian story of the Epic of Gilgamesh.
- There appear to be contradictions in the Bible and guidelines that would today seem immoral (slavery, genocide, rape - Joshua. There was a mistake when translation “Virgin”. The story of the flood is 40 days in one account an 150 days in another.
- Priests, Bishops, encyclicals, the conscience and situation ethics should also be used.
- The Bible doesn’t contain information about all moral issues - like stem cell research or cloning.
Christians SHOULD use Church Teachings
- The Bible teaches that the Church is the Body of Christ on Earth and therefore the Church has he same authority as Jesus did - “so Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers, to equip his people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up.” The church is how Jesus wanted to act in the world today.
- Everyone who works in the Church will have had training and will have studied the Bible and their chosen denomination extensively. Those in the Church can be trusted that what they are teaching is God’s will.
- Christ is called the Head of the Church in the New Testament so Church teachings come from Jesus. “ Then Jesus came to them and said ‘All authority in heaven and on Earth has been given to me’”. (Matthew 28:18-20)
- The Holy Spirit is present in the Church today so can guide leader in modern-day issues that aren’t covered in the Bible - like stem-cell research, euthanasia and organ donation.
Why would some people not use Church teachings as the only source of moral guidance?
- Don’t take modern morals into account.
- Human beings can make mistakes.
- In the Roman Catholic Church all men, covering female problems.
- A Christian’s conscience may tell them to act in a different way.
Christians SHOULD use the conscience
- It is an inner feeling of right or wrong and helps people to choose the ‘right’ answer because “people basically tend towards good and away from evil. Conscience is the ‘reason making right decisions.’” (Thomas Aquinas)
- Church teachings support the use of the conscience - “in all his activity a man is bound to follow conscience faithfully, in order that he may come to God for whom he was created. It follows that he is not to be forces to act in a manner contrary to his conscience.” (Declaration on Religious Freedom, Vatican)
- Helps Christians know what to do in specific circumstances. E.g. Dietrich Bonhoeffer ‘Christians are…faced with a dilemma: when assaulted by evil, they must oppose it through direct action… Any failure to act is simply to condone evil.’
- It is a natural guide given to us by God. Joseph Butler (Anglican priest and theologian) said that it is “our natural guide, the guide assigned us by the Author of nature.”
Christians should NOT use the conscience
- The conscience could be biased towards personal preferences - ‘apparent’ rather than ‘real’ goods (Aquinas).
- The conscience should not be used properly by itself as it may not have been understood properly. Christians should consult the Bible and Church teachings before conscience.
- The conscience is not from God it is from our environment (Freud). ‘The human psyche is inspired by powerful instinctive desires that must be satisfied’. Children learn that the world restricts desires. Humans create the ego, which accounts for societies desires. The ‘superego’ internalises and reflects anger and disapproval of others.
- The conscience may be mistaken - e.g. Peter Sutcliffe, who said God led him to do things, but God has no evil, his conscience was wrong - meaning one cannot always just follow their conscience.
Christians SHOULD use situation ethics
- Jesus’ teachings - Jesus taught use to ‘love one another’ (John 13:24). ‘Greater love has no man than the man who lays down his life for a friend’.
- Jesus is a role model for this approach - adulterous woman, Jesus breaks an absolute law (‘he who is without sin cast the first stone’). Jesus picks corn on the Sabbath, saying ‘sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath’.
- Situation ethics are personal and based on the well-being of others. In situations such as divorce, divorce may be the thing which makes everyone happiest.
- Situation ethics are a pragmatic way to deal with a something. It’s more flexible and useful than following Biblical rules for the sake of it - there will always be situations that break moral absolutes.
Christians should NOT use Situation Ethics
- It goes against fundamental commandments in the Bible - the Bible put these laws for us, for our well-being and we should stick to them.
- St. Paul points out that the law was put in place because humans are likely to be selfish and sinful if they try to decide themselves. Aquinas also believed this arguing that laws are put in place to curb self-interest. We can be selfish and argue the most loving this is what we want.
- It might lead to evil acts - we are not able to predict the consequences of what happens, therefore if evil arises it is our fault. In principal, murder could be condoned when applying Situation Ethics.
- The idea of love could be “subjective” - depending on the situation, our love can change and we help one person over someone else - e.g. if one is romantically involved. The most loving action could be different from the most loving consequence.
Why are human rights important to Christians?
- Every human being is created by God in his image and we are all equal in his eyes - ‘So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them, male and female he created them.’ (Imago Dei - Genisis 1:27). ‘From one human being he created all races on the Earth.’ (Acts 17:26)
- The teachings of the Bible uphold human rights - ‘Learn to do rights; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.’ (Isaiah 1:17). ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.’
- Church teachings uphold human rights. Pope John XXIII: ‘each individual is truly a person’. Desmond Tutu: ‘he does not tolerate a relationship with himself that excludes your neighbour’.
- Jesus is a role model for the protection of people’s human rights: Ten Commandments, The Sermon on the Mount, The Parable of the Sheep and Goats, The Parable of the Good Samaritan. Outcasts - lepers, prostitutes, tax collectors, Roman centurion, Good Samaritan.
Examples of human rights and Christianity
- Archbishop Desmond Tutu and the fight against Apartheid - speaking out in South Africa. “God is weeping” - about President Mugabe of Zimbabwe.
- William Wilberforce and the abolition of slavery - “God Almighty has set before me two great objects, the suppression of the Slave Trade and the Reformation of Manners”.
- Lord Shaftesbury and the Factory Act/Ragged Schools Union.
- Actions by Christians Against Torture - “Remember those who are being tortured, as though you yourselves were being tortured” (Hebrews 13:3) is a quote chosen by the association. Jesus was tortured.
- Christian Solitary Worldwide - produced a report called ‘North Korea : A Case to Answer, A Call to Act’ about religious persecution in North Korea.
Genetic Engineering is too dangerous for humans to experiment with
- There are long-term consequences of genetically modified creatures such as Dolly the Sheep - which suffered from a lung disease and lived for half the amount of time that an average sheep would.
- Use of embryos for Stem Cell Research. An embryo is a potential human life
- Technologies could be used for “evil” - biological weapons could be developed to carry out murders.
- Slippery slope - people could start to be altered just to make people disease free (e.g. finding out that a child in the womb had autism and then making them not autistic) - but it could continue into altering babies in the womb to be tall, athletic, beautiful, etc.