Robberey Flashcards
(17 cards)
Theft act 1968
S8 - a person is guilty of robbery if he steals and immediately before or at the time of doing son and in order to do so he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force
Key elements of robbery
Theft
Force
Or putting any person in fear of force - the force must be immediately before or at the time of the theft and in order to steal
Mr
Intention to use force to steal
R v zerei
D pulled a knife. Punched v and took his car keys.
Robbery requires a completed theft to take place
R v waters 2015
D snatched v phone from her abd told her that she could have it back if one of her friends would speak to D. The police were immediately called to the scene and d was charged abd convicted of robbery. The court of appeal quashed the conviction because the evidence dud nit establish an intention to permanently deprive V of the phone. Ds condition of returning the phone could have been fulfilled in the near future. This meant that there was no theft, therefore, no robberies.
Theft or robbery
Of force is used then robbery has happened the theft is complete
Carcoran v Anderson 1980
R v zereri
If no theft take place, e.g the v does not let go of the bag, then there is attempted theft and the dcould be charged with attempted robbery.
Corcoran v Anderson 1980
One of the d hit a woman in the back and tugged her bag. She let go of the bag abd it fell to the ground. D ran off without the bag as the women was screaming and attracting attention
It was held the theft was complete so the d was guilty of robbery
Legal principle - when force is used to steal, the movement a theft is comeplte there is robbery
R v Dawson and James
Needs to be a small amount of force
Legal principle - small amount of force can also be robbery
R v clouden
Wrenched a shopping basket out the v handConfirmed the fact that a degree of force is needed even if it is a small amount
R v DPP 2012
There was no need to show that v felt threatened, the d on,y has to seek to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force.
Threat of force
If a v is unaware of the force (pickpocketing) then there is no robbery on,y theft
However fear of force is sufficient if the v is aware of it
The victim does not need to be frightened, it is enough that the d is trying to cause fear
Fear immediately before or at the time of the theft
There are 2 issues with this doscription
- How immediate is immediately before
. A gang attack a bank finial in order to get the codes for the safe. The gang then drive to the bank and steal the money. Theft has taken place sometime after the force is this still robbery
2 when is the theft complete
This needs to be decided so it can be confirmed that the force was at the time of the ft
R v hale 1979
Force needs to be before or during the theft
R v lockley 1995
D was caught shoplifting cans of beer. He sees force on the shopkeeper who tried to stop his from escaping. D appealed on the basis that the theft was complet when he used dice but the court of appeal followed the decision in hale and unheld his conviction.
Legally - Followed the precedent in Hal’s that theft can be a continuing act
Force in order to steal
Force mufirce has to be used with the purpose of stealing not hitting someone then seeing money and stealing it
Mens Rea
,r of theft (dishonest and intention to permanently deprive)
Intention to use force to steal