Romanian orphan studies: Institutionalisation Flashcards

1
Q

What are orphan studies?

A

Study of children placed in care (parents were unable to care for them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is institutionalisation?

A

Effects of living in an institutional setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why was Romania significant due to a high level of orphans?

A
  • 1990s- President Nicolai Ceaucescu required women to have 5 children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was Rutter et al’s procedure?

A
  • Follow 165 Romanian orphans in the English and Romanian adoptee (ERA)
  • Adoption by UK families
  • Physical, cognitive, emotional development assessed at 4,5,6,11,15, 22-25 years
  • 52 UK adopted kids= control group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Rutter’s aim when studying Romanian orphans?

A
  • Investigate extent to which good care makes up for poor early experiences in institutions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Rutter find in his orphan study?

A
  • 1/2 adoptees showed signs of delayed intellectual development
  • Majority= severely undernourished
  • By 11, different rates of recovery occured, related to age of adoption
  • Mean IQ: pre 6 months= 102, between 6 months and 2 years= 86, after 2 years= 77
  • Adoption after 6 months led to disinhibited attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the symptoms of disinhibited attachment?

A
  • Attention-seeking
  • Clinginess
  • Social behaviour directed towards adults
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Zeenah et al’s procedure?

A
  • Bucharest early intervention (BEI)
  • Assess attachment in 95 Romanian kids, aged 12-31 months (90% lived in instutions most of their lives)
  • Compare to control of 50 kids, never lived in institutions
  • Attachment type measured (SS)
  • Carers asked about unsual social behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were Zeenah et al’s findings?

A
  • 74% of control group were securely attached
  • Vs 19% of institutional group
  • 44% of institutionalised kids displayed disinhibited attachment vs 20% of control kids
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 2 main effects of institutionalisation?

A
  • Disinhibited attachment
  • Intellectual disability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does research show about disinhibited attachment?

A
  • Lives spent in institutions= more likely to show signs of disinhibited attachment
    -Rutter- an adaptation to multiple caregivers during sensitive period
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does research show about intellectual disability?

A
  • Rutter’s study: most shows signs of intellectual disability
  • Before 6 months- caught up to control by 4 years
  • Damage can be recovered if adoption occurs before 6 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the strengths of Romanian orphan studies?

A
  • Real world application
  • Fewer confounding variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the limitations of Romanian orphan studies?

A
  • Introduction of confounding variables
  • Lacks of adult data
  • Social sensitive research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strength-
I- Real world application

A

D- Studies allow psychologists to prevent the worst of poor conditions. Led to improvements to the care system- e.g: avoid large numbers of caregivers per child
E- Means kids in institutions have a chance to develop ‘normal’ attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strength-
I- Fewer confounding variables

A

D- Other orphan studies (during WW2) experienced trauma, so it is difficult to disentangle effects of neglect, abuse, bereavement. Kids handed over by loving parents- so lack this extent of trauma
E- Means results are less likely to be confounded, so research is high in validity

17
Q

Limitation-
I- Introduction of confounding variables

A

D- Quality of care was poor, so kids had little intellectual stimulation or comfort
E- Means harmful effects may represent effects of poor institutional care

18
Q

Limitation-
I- Lack of adult data

A

D- Latest data from ERA study- kids are mid 20s. No current data to answer questions about long term institutional care, e.g: prevelance of mental health issues, success in forming/maintaining relationships
E- Means it will be a while before we understand long term effects

19
Q

Limitation-
I- Research is socially sensitive

A

D- Shows late-adopted children having poor developmental outcomes. Results published as kids grew up, so people may have lowered their expectations and treated them differently
E- Creates a self-fulfilling prophecy