Rule Of Law Flashcards

1
Q

What is the formal perspective on rule of law?

A
  • legal procedure = clear and certain
  • prospective
  • law = clear
  • applied equally
  • independent judiciary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is different about the substantive perspective?

A

Moral component also necessary

No rule of law without fundamental rights and freedoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are Dicey’s 8 fundamental principles of the rule of law?

A
  1. Accessible, clear and predictable
  2. Legal issues resolved through legal processes
  3. Apply equally to all
  4. Protect human rights
  5. Access to justice without inordinate expense/delay
  6. Public officials exercise powers in good faith/within limits
  7. Fair
  8. Comply with international law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the requirement of legality?

A
  • govt interference should be sanctioned by legal authority
  • legality principle - parliament must expressly restrict rights and freedoms
  • public bodies - statutory provisions will define and limit capacity
  • independence of judiciary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are three examples of retrospective legislation?

A
  • War Damage Act - not paying damages for property destroyed in war
  • War Crimes Act - punishing war crimes by non british people
  • Jobseekers Back to Work Schemes Act - judgement to give rebate for those who refused to take part overriden
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the ruling in R v Somerset County Council ex parte Fewings?

A

Ban on stag hunting for ethical reasons was not using their powers for its intended purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does legislation often confer?

A

Discretionary power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the exceptions to the rule of law applying equally to everyone?

A
  • Monarch is above (criminal) law
  • Judges in higher courts immune to civil litigation for acts done within their official jurisdiction
  • Parliamentary privilege (against defamation)
  • Diplomatic immunity
  • Children not subject to same laws as adults
  • Cuts to legal aid funding?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the most obvious barrier to obtaining justice?

A

Not enough money to pay legal fees
Not being able to secure pro bono
Cuts to legal aid
Court fees and potentially paying other side costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are examples of objective differences that justify/don’t justify differentiation?

A
  • age of criminal responsibility
  • deporting non British nationals
  • not justified - detaining non nationals terrorism suspects without charge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an example of rule of law being undermined by unequal application of the law?

A

Asian/ethnic minorities being targeted more by Terrorism Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Do we have human rights without the HRA and why is it needed?

A

Yes under common law but HRA provides clarity + mechanisms of enforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What has Liberty identified as significant threats to the right to fair trial?

A
  • fast track extradition treaties
  • widespread use of Asbos and civil orders
  • closed material procedures for terrorism suspects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the basis of the JISC report on breaking international rule of law?

A

Overseas Detainee mistreatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does rule of law mean for government criticising judges?

A

They should respect the role of judges as the final arbiters of what the law means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are developing challenges to the rule of law?

A
  • proposed repeal of HRA
  • EU withdrawal
  • increased automation of public decisions
  • parliamentary sovereignty
17
Q

What powers does the EU withdrawal act create for the government?

A

Henry VIII powers: allowing govt to change primary legislation with statutory instruments without recourse to Parliament

18
Q

What was the principle in Entick v Carrington?

A

Govt power can only be exercised on identifiable authority in a lawful manner

19
Q

What is one of the principal sources of legislative restriction over the use of executive power?

A

Human Rights Act 1998

20
Q

What are the important implications of the HRA?

A
  • court redress for convention rights breaches
  • public authorities must act in accordance with convention rights
  • parliament ensures new laws are compatible with convention
21
Q

What are the different types of rights in the ECHR?

A
  • absolute: never restricted
  • limited/qualified rights
22
Q

When can qualified rights be interfered with?

A
  • legitimate aim
  • in accordance with/prescribed by law
  • necessary in a democratic society
23
Q

What was the result in the Belmarsh case?

A

Govt could not derogate from the right to personal liberty for terrorist suspects detained without trial as it was based on their nationality

24
Q

What are constitutional statutes?

A
  • conditions legal relationship between citizen and state or
  • enlarges/diminishes scope of fundamental constitutional rights
25
Q

What are old examples of constitutional statutes?

A
  • Bill of Rights 1689; Act of settlement 1701
  • Parliament Act 1911
  • representation of the People Act 1918
26
Q

What are recent examples of constitutional statutes?

A
  • European Communities Act 1972
  • Scotland Act 1998
  • Constitutional Reform Act 2005
27
Q

What is the doctrine of implied repeal?

A

New statutes which are inconsistent with an existing statute will automatically supersede

28
Q

Can implied repeal apply to constitutional statutes?

A

No, only by express words in later statute/words so specific that the inference of an actual determination was irresistible