rules Flashcards

(89 cards)

1
Q

common law murder

A

-unlawful killing of another human being
-malice aforethought
–> intent to kill
–> intent to inflict substantial injury
–> reckless indifference to unjustifiably high risk to human life
–> FM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

felony murder

A

BARRK: burglary, arson, robbery, rape, kidnapping. analyze these elements first.

  • inherently dangerous felony
  • proximately caused or during commission of felony
  • foreseeable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FM death of bystander

A

killed by police officer or victim

majority/CA: D not liable
minority: D liable if foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FM death of co-felon

A

not guilty if police or bystander or victim kills the co-D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FM point of safety

A

killing after commission of felony and D reached place of safety, then no FM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

first degree murder

A

premeditated: enough time to reflect on idea or to plan

deliberate: decision to kill in cool or dispassionate manner

FMR if statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

second degree murder

A

common law murder
statutory definitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

voluntary manslaughter

A

-provocation that arouses sudden/intense passion in ordinary person
-D provoked actually
-insufficient time to cool off
-D didn’t cool off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

imperfect self defense

A

D’s use of deadly force was inappropriate but D unreasonably thought it was appropriate

–> voluntary manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

involuntary slaughter

A

killing with criminal/gross negligence +actual/proximate causation

OR

Malum in se misdo + causation/proximate cause
Malum in prohibitum does not count unless criminal negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

insanity tests

A

M’Naghten: mental disease means D did not know quality of act or wrongfulness

irresistible impulse: mental disease prevented him from being able to conform conduct

Durham: act was product of mental disease AND but for cause

MPC: didn’t have substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness or conform conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

self defense

A

use of reasonable force to protect oneself against unlawful force at a reasonable time

not initial aggressor

defense of others is same standard but to protect another person

duty to retreat ONLY if deadly force in some jxs (minority rule)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

defense of property

A

reasonable, nondeadly force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

voluntary intoxication

A

can be def to specific intent if prevents D from forming mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

involuntary intoxication

A

-unknowing or forced ingestion
-defense to all crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

duress

A

-unlawful threat
-causes D to reasonably and subjectively believe only way to avoid death or serious bodily injury to D or another
-immediate threat of harm
-causes the act

NOT ok for intentional murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

entrapment

A

-crime induced by govt official
-D not predisposed to commit crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

mistake of law

A

for specific intent crimes

o D relied on court decision/administrative order or official interpretation

o Statutory definition of malum prohibitum crime not available before conduct

NOT lawyer’s bad advice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

mistake of fact

A

for general intent crimes only if reasonable

for specific intent crimes always

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

necessity

A

defense if act was in response to natural forces at CL

modern law is natural and human forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

criminal battery

A

-intentional/general intent
-unlawful application of force
-another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

specific intent crimes

A

FIAT

first deg murder
inchoate crimes
assault w/ intent to commit battery
theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

assault

A

-attempt to commit a battery OR

-intentionally placing another in fear
-of imminent bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

kidnapping

A

-unlawful confinement of person
-against person’s will
-movement of person OR concealment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
larceny
-trespassory: nonconsensual -taking: removal from owner's possession into another's control -carrying away: any movement -of personal property -of another -with specific intent to permanently deprive owner of property
26
embezzlement
-fraudulent -conversion -of property -of another -by a person who is in lawful possession of property An intent to return the exact property that is converted, coupled with the ability to do so at the time that intent is formed, negates the intent to defraud required for conversion.  But a mere intent to return similar property or the cash value of the property does not negate the requisite intent.  ## Footnote C FLOP
27
burglary
-breaking: using force to create an opening into a dwelling -and entering: any body part or instrument of D -into the dwelling of another: need not be inhabited at time but can't be abandoned -at night: period of darkness between sunset and sunrise -specific intent to commit a felony therein does not merge
28
robbery
-larceny -force or intimidation: more force than to do the taking -from V or in his presence
29
receipt of stolen goods
-receipt of stolen property -knowledge property was wrongfully taken -intent to deprive owner of property
30
false pretenses
obtain title by deception
31
larceny by trick
obtain possession by deception
32
accomplice liability
-aids or abets a principal -prior to or during crime -intent for crime to be committed also on hook for crimes that are natural and probable consequences
33
withdrawal as an accomplice
-repudiation of prior act -undoing prior assistance -notifying police -before chain of events are in motion and unstoppable ## Footnote BURN
34
accessory after fact
-aid felon to avoid apprehension -after felony committed -knew felony was committed
35
conspiracy
-agreement -2+ people -accomplish unlawful purpose -specific intent to agree and commit criminal objective -overt act in furtherance (majority, not needed in CL) no merger on hook for co-conspirator's crimes in furtherance of conspiracy ## Footnote AT USO
36
withdrawal from conspiracy
-can withdraw before conspiracy is formed and avoid all liability: communicate intent to all conspirators or inform law enforcement -can withdraw from conspiracy after overt act: thwart success -withdraw from conspiracy but limit liability for substantive crimes: inform other conspirators of withdrawal or timely telling police
37
attempt
-specific intent to achieve criminal act -substantial step OR dangerous proximity (CL) merger defs: legal impossibility and abandonment
38
solicitation
-entices/encourages/asks another person -to commit a crime -with intent that other person does commit crime merger
39
valid arrest
-D's home w/ warrant -public place and witnesses felony or misdemeanor -public place and probable cause that felony was committed
40
terry stop
RS that person engaged in or has engaged in criminal activity
41
police checkpoint
ok if not for general crime prevention
42
traffic stop
RS or PC of traffic violation
43
searches
-cannot violate reasonable expectation of privacy: possessory or ownership interest or -A search may also occur when the government physically intrudes upon private property for the purposes of obtaining information.
44
curtilage
four factors -proximity of area to home -enclosure surrounding home -nature of uses to which area is put -if area is protected from observation by passerby
45
technology
-sense-enhancing -not in use by general public -to learn something that would be otherwise unknowable without physical intrusion o Attaching a tracking device to a person without consent is a search; collecting cellsite location information from a wireless carrier to track a person requires a warrant o Physically intruding on a suspect’s property to install a technological device may be a search
46
valid search warrant
-detached and neutral magistrate -PC -described with particularity the D/crime or places to be searched and items to be seized
47
informants
reliable, known informant ok anonymous ok only if you also independently verify
48
search exceptions
G'S ESCAPE Good faith on defective search warrant Search incident to lawful arrest Exigent circumstances Stop and Frisk Consent Automobiles Plain View & protective sweep Evidence from administrative search
49
stop and frisk
-can pat outer clothing of D for purposes of officer safety and seize anything immediately recognizable as contraband. RS of crime to sotp. cars: -lawful stop -frisk if RS of weapons in places where weapons would be if suspicion leads to PC, can arrest
50
search incident to lawful arrest
-lawful arrest -contemporaneous search of arrestee and immediate surrounding area -->including glove compartments if D in reaching area
51
protective sweep
places adjoining of arrest in house where people may be hiding
52
automobile exception
-if they have PC that car has contraband -search any place of car that could contain contraband or evidence
53
plain view
-police lawfully present -criminal nature immediately apparent -the officer has lawful access to the item.
54
exigent circumstances
-hot pursuit of fleeing felon -danger of evidence destruction -public/police safety
55
consent
must be voluntary
56
exceptions to exclusionary rule
I Am Going Insane inevitable discovery attenuation good faith reliance on warrant or law Independent source
57
miranda
-custody: reasonable person would not feel free to leave or deprived of freedom -interrogation: questioning or conduct likely to elicit incriminating response --> govt informants or D doesn't know --> NOT interrogation
58
reapproaching D after Miranda
counsel: break in custody for 14+ days, then need fresh warnings and waiver silence: only if D was released and indicates desire to sepak
59
Miranda violation result
-exclude statements -can impeach w/ statements if D testifies -NOT physical evidence
60
sixth amendment right to counsel
-automatically applies -at critical stages of prosecution -after formal proceedings begin -offense specific note: photo arrays are not critical stages can't apply to preindictment line ups
61
jury trial right vs right to counsel
There is a right to a jury trial for offenses that carry an authorized sentence of more than six months, regardless of the actual penalty imposed. There is a right to counsel where defendant is actually imprisoned or there is authorized sentence of more than a year.
62
5th Am right to counsel
-not offense specific -unequivocally invoke -must cease questioning until counsel arrives
63
due process violations - lineups
-unnecessarily suggestive, or -substantial likelihood of misidentification
64
confrontation clause
if: -testimonial statement -declarant is unavailable -no prior opportunity to cross W --> inadmissible codefendants: non-testifying codefendant statements are inadmissible against other defendant right to compel w's
65
guilty plea
must knowingly and intelligently waive right. judge must -inform of rights being waived -inform of possible sentences -immigration and collateral consequences -factual basis for plea -plea didn't occur from coercion, duress, threats ## Footnote CF RSV
66
right to discharge attorney and substitute attorney
-if D is not indigent, entitled to counsel of choice as long as --lawyer is properly admitted in jx -available in jx -no conflict of interest
67
right to represent oneself
entitled to rep yourself unless incompetent or untimely Competence: To be competent to stand trial, the defendant must understand the nature of the proceedings against him and the consequences of the proceedings. However, a defendant who is competent to stand trial may nevertheless be found incompetent to represent himself. not enough to not know legal knowledge to be incompetent untimely: how soon before trial?
68
right to speedy trial
due process: pre-accusation delay speedy trial, 6th amendment: delay between time of arrest/indictment and trial. balance factors: -length of delay -reason for delay -whether D asserted right to speedy trial -risk of prejudice to D
69
IAC
-fallen below objective standard of performance -resulting prejudice: reasonable probability of different result conflict of interest: representation of Ds with conflicting interests may amount to ineffective assistance of counsel; must show actual conflict and an adverse effect on counsel’s performance Actual conflict—occurs when a court determines that the defense attorney is subject to an obligation/unique personal interest that, if followed, would lead her to adopt a strategy other than that most favorable to the D Adverse impact—occurs when a plausible alternative strategy/tactic might have been pursued but was inherently in conflict with, or not undertaken, due to the attorney’s other loyalties or interests
70
principal
someone whose acts/omissions are actus reus
71
consent to enter home
voluntary. Police can lie but not about having a warrant. Totality of circumstances.
72
DP: confessions
involuntary confessions always inadmissible. totality of circumstances test. official compulsion needed for involuntariness
73
D's right to testify
due process right
74
transferred provocation
Under the doctrine of transferred provocation, when a defendant accidentally kills the wrong person, he will be guilty of voluntary manslaughter if that would have been his crime had he killed the provoker
75
accomplice to felony murder - when can you impose death penalty?
The death penalty cannot be imposed on an accomplice to felony murder who did not kill or intend to kill—unless the accomplice (1) significantly participated in the felony and (2) acted with reckless indifference to human life.
76
double jeopardy exception
Double jeopardy does not prohibit a second prosecution for the same offense when (1) the defendant was convicted of a lesser offense at the first trial, (2) the second prosecution involves a greater offense, and (3) the facts necessary to prove that offense did not exist during the first trial.  But the defendant must be indicted before the statute of limitations expires.
77
impossibility (factual vs legal)
Impossibility is not a valid defense to attempt if the crime attempted is factually impossible. If, however, the act intended is not a crime (i.e., a legal impossibility), then the defendant is not guilty of attempt.
78
MPC mens reas
Purposely: requires that D had conscious objective to engage in the proscribed conduct. Subjective test. Knowingly: requires awareness that conduct is of a particular nature or will cause a particular result. Subjective test. Recklessly: requires conscious disregard of a substantial known risk. Subjective test. Negligently: requires failure to be aware of a substantial risk. Objective test.
79
extortion
unlawful taking of money by another by threat (CL: by govt official)
80
forgery
makes a false document of legal significance + intent to defraud
81
use immunity vs transactional immunity
“Use” immunity prohibits only the use of the compelled testimony against the witness. If the government does prosecute the witness in such a case, the government has the burden to show that the compelled testimony did not provide an investigatory lead that was helpful to the prosecution. Transactional immunity is a legal protection that prevents a witness from being prosecuted for any crimes related to their testimony.
82
apprendi and exception
With respect to the sentence, generally only a jury is permitted to find a fact that serves to increase the maximum penalty that can be imposed for a crime. However, an exception exists if that fact is a prior conviction of the defendant.
83
LWOP and minors
A sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment" under the Eighth Amendment when the sentence is imposed for a non-homicide crime on a defendant who was a minor at the time that the crime was committed
84
heinous
Under the modern view, a heinous murder—ie, one that results from an especially egregious act, such as ambush, torture, bombing, terrorism, or poisoning—constitutes first-degree murder.
85
cell phone data
Under the third-party doctrine, individuals generally have no reasonable expectation of privacy in information voluntarily turned over to a third party, so a warrant is not required to collect such information.  However, a warrant is required to collect historical cell-phone site-location data—even if it is held by a third party.
86
mayhem
Mayhem usually requires a general intent to maim or cause bodily harm accompanied by an unlawful act of physical force that either permanently dismembered the victim or disabled the use of some part of their body.
87
prelim
1. Probable cause to detain * Must be held within 48 hours of arrest to determine PC * Fourth Amendment guarantees D right to be released if no PC * No remedy if detention is unlawful (other than exclusion of evidence) 2. Initial appearance—judge advises D of the charges and his rights and appoints counsel if the defendant is indigent; judge may also decide conditions of bail and accept a plea
88
right to bail
no constitutional right to bail, but denial of or excessive bail must comply with Due Process Clause
89
possession offenses
* D exercises dominion and control over a prohibited object or substance * D is not required to be aware that possession of the object is illegal * Duration of possession—must be for a period long enough to have provided D with an opportunity to cease such dominion and control