rules Flashcards
(89 cards)
common law murder
-unlawful killing of another human being
-malice aforethought
–> intent to kill
–> intent to inflict substantial injury
–> reckless indifference to unjustifiably high risk to human life
–> FM
felony murder
BARRK: burglary, arson, robbery, rape, kidnapping. analyze these elements first.
- inherently dangerous felony
- proximately caused or during commission of felony
- foreseeable
FM death of bystander
killed by police officer or victim
majority/CA: D not liable
minority: D liable if foreseeable
FM death of co-felon
not guilty if police or bystander or victim kills the co-D
FM point of safety
killing after commission of felony and D reached place of safety, then no FM
first degree murder
premeditated: enough time to reflect on idea or to plan
deliberate: decision to kill in cool or dispassionate manner
FMR if statute
second degree murder
common law murder
statutory definitions
voluntary manslaughter
-provocation that arouses sudden/intense passion in ordinary person
-D provoked actually
-insufficient time to cool off
-D didn’t cool off
imperfect self defense
D’s use of deadly force was inappropriate but D unreasonably thought it was appropriate
–> voluntary manslaughter
involuntary slaughter
killing with criminal/gross negligence +actual/proximate causation
OR
Malum in se misdo + causation/proximate cause
Malum in prohibitum does not count unless criminal negligence
insanity tests
M’Naghten: mental disease means D did not know quality of act or wrongfulness
irresistible impulse: mental disease prevented him from being able to conform conduct
Durham: act was product of mental disease AND but for cause
MPC: didn’t have substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness or conform conduct
self defense
use of reasonable force to protect oneself against unlawful force at a reasonable time
not initial aggressor
defense of others is same standard but to protect another person
duty to retreat ONLY if deadly force in some jxs (minority rule)
defense of property
reasonable, nondeadly force
voluntary intoxication
can be def to specific intent if prevents D from forming mens rea
involuntary intoxication
-unknowing or forced ingestion
-defense to all crimes
duress
-unlawful threat
-causes D to reasonably and subjectively believe only way to avoid death or serious bodily injury to D or another
-immediate threat of harm
-causes the act
NOT ok for intentional murder
entrapment
-crime induced by govt official
-D not predisposed to commit crime
mistake of law
for specific intent crimes
o D relied on court decision/administrative order or official interpretation
o Statutory definition of malum prohibitum crime not available before conduct
NOT lawyer’s bad advice
mistake of fact
for general intent crimes only if reasonable
for specific intent crimes always
necessity
defense if act was in response to natural forces at CL
modern law is natural and human forces
criminal battery
-intentional/general intent
-unlawful application of force
-another person
specific intent crimes
FIAT
first deg murder
inchoate crimes
assault w/ intent to commit battery
theft
assault
-attempt to commit a battery OR
-intentionally placing another in fear
-of imminent bodily harm
kidnapping
-unlawful confinement of person
-against person’s will
-movement of person OR concealment