Rules Flashcards
MEE rules (136 cards)
2 kinds of Actual Authority
Can be express–where agent expressly given authority to act for principal–or implied–where principal’s conduct leads agent to believe it has authority
Definition & Elements of Apparent Authority
Apparent authority is where a 3p reasonably believes the agent has authority
- The person dealing with the agent must do so with a reasonable belief in the agent’s authority AND
- The belief must be generated by some act/neglect on the part of the principal
When does vicarious liability impute an agent’s liability to the principal?
- Agent/ee acting in scope of employment
- Agent/ee made only a minor deviation from employment
- Agent committed an intentional tort that was solely for the principal’s benefit/authorized by principal/intentional tort arose naturally due to nature of employment
Contract liability of principal & agent for contracts entered into by agent
Agent is bound to the K if: 1. agent acts without actual or apparent authority; 2. Principal is undisclosed (ie 3p doesn’t know that an agent is acting on behalf of another); or 3. Principal is partially disclosed (3p knows that agent is acting on behalf of another but doesn’t know P’s identity)
Partnership formation
A partnership is the association of 2 or more people to carry on as co-owners a business for profit whether or not the persons intended to form the partnership. (Very easy to form general partnership)
Fiduciary duties of partners
Loyalty, Care, Account
Rights of Creditors in a general partnership
Partners are liable for debts of general partnership, but creditors must attempt to collect from partnership itself before it goes after personal assets of partners
Venue Rule
Venue proper where: 1. any defendant lives, if all defendants live in the same state; 2. in the district where a substantial part of the events/omissions giving rise to the claim occurred; or 3. where a substantial part of property that is subject to the action is situated
3 kinds of SMJ
- Diversity jurisdiction: complete diversity (based on domicile when action is filed) & amount over 75k
- Federal Question jurisdiction: Suit arises out of the constitution, US treaties, or fed law. Federal question must appear on the face of the complaint.
- Supplemental: If one claim already meets requirements of Diversity or FQJ, all other claims that are so related that they form the same case/controversy (e.g. common nucleus of operative fact) may also be brought in. (N.B. No SuppJx in diversity where additional claim would destroy complete diversity. Amt in controversy not relevant in SuppJx.)
Personal Jurisdiction - Analysis
Look to see if state long arm statute is satisfied (statutory analysis). If so, proceed to constitutional analysis by looking at defendant’s contacts w/forum state. Defendant must have at least minimum contacts such that the exercise of jx would be fair. Contact can’t be accidental–def must purposefully avail self of the privilege of conducting activities in forum state. Def must know/reas anticipate that contact w/forum state could cause def to be haled into court there.
PJ Source
14th Ad. DPC
PJ Types
specific (case stems from def’s contacts in forum) & general (defendant subject to jx where def is domiciled or where def’s contacts w/forum state are continuous & systematic such that def feels at home
2 kinds of transfers & choice of law used
- Transfer to a more appropriate forum–case properly brought in original venue but transfer made for the convenience of parties/witnesses or in the interest of justice. Apply law of transferor court (where case originally brought).
- Transfer to a proper venue: case filed in wrong venue to begin with. Apply law of transferee court (where case was transferred).
Removal Procedure
File notice in fed court & division where action is pending with copies to state court and opp parties. Must file within 30 days of receiving complaint. Notice must contain removal grounds. All defendants must join in removal. If removal on the basis of diversity, can’t remove after 1 year in state court unless bad faith by plaintiff
What is Permissive Joinder?
Can join parties when
- a claim is made by each plaintiff and against each defendant relating to/arising out of the same series of occurrences AND
- there is a question or law/fact common to all parties
What is the Klaxon rule?
Fed court in diversity must apply choice of law approach used by state in which it sites. E.g. NY pl vs MA def in NY fed court will apply NY choice of law rule. No incentive for parties to forum shop.
What choice of law to use in prenup enforcement?
If no choice of law clause in prenup, apply law of state in which prenup was executed OR the state with the most significant relationship with the parties
Elements of common law marriage
- cohabitation; 2. they hold each other out as spouses; 3. couple intends to be married (i.e. both agree that they are married)
Choice of law in postmortem distribution of decedents’ estates - personal property
personal property: law of state where decent was domiciled
Choice of law in postmortem distribution of decedents’ estates - personal property
Law of state where property is located
Commerce power
Cg has power to regulate channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, persons and things in interstate commerce, or anything that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce (very broad)
Dormant Commerce Clause
If Cg is silent, state may regulate commerce BUT if it facially discriminates against IC–> apply strict scrutiny (will probably fail). If not discriminatory on its fact, balance burden & benefit (will probably pass)
Rational basis test
Pl bears burden of proving that the law is NOT rationally related to a legitimate government interest
(P usually loses)
Intermediate Scrutiny
Govt bears burden of proving that the classification is substantially related to an important government interest
(gender, illegitimacy)