Rylands v fletcher Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

What is the principle established in Rylands v Fletcher?

A

Harm done as a result of something dangerous escaping from neighboring land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can claim under Rylands v Fletcher?

A

Claimant can claim if they have interest in the land.

Example: Transco v Stockport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is required of the defendant in Rylands v Fletcher?

A

Defendant must be the occupier in control of the land.

Example: Read v Lyons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What must the defendant do regarding substances on the land?

A

Defendant must bring a substance onto the land, or it must accumulate there.

Example: Water brought to land and stays in reservoir, can’t be naturally present (Giles v Walker)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Lord Cairns state about the use of land?

A

Must be non-natural use of land, subjective and depends on the land; non-natural is an extraordinary or unusual use of land.

Examples: Transco v Stockport, Eastern countries leather, Charing cross

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must be likely if something escapes?

A

It must be likely to do mischief if it escapes; injury must be foreseeable.

Example: Hale v Jennings Bros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does ‘escape’ mean in the context of Rylands v Fletcher?

A

Escape means to leave a place that the defendant has control over to a place outside control; things that escape must be what the defendant brought onto the land.

Example: Stannard v Gore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What type of damage can be claimed under Rylands v Fletcher?

A

Claim property damage, not personal injury.

Example: Transco v Stockport

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What must be reasonably foreseeable in Rylands v Fletcher?

A

Must be reasonably foreseeable; a small amount of chemical contaminating water through ground is not foreseeable.

Example: Cambridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly