Rylands V Fletcher Flashcards
(8 cards)
Describe
The C and D
British Celanese v Hunt
Apart RvF
C
Must be a person who has a interest in the land affected.
D
Must be in control or possession of their own land.
British Celanese v Hunt - The D must have some control over the land on which the material is stored.
Introduce
Rylands v Fletcher
Rylands v Fletcher
Apart of RvF
Four part test from the case of Rylands v Fletcher
Describe
Bringing onto the land and accumulation
Giles v Walker
Apart of RvF
The D must bring the thing onto the land and accumulate it there.
Giles v Walker - There will be no liability if the thing naturally accumulates there.
Describe
The thing is likely to cause a mischief if it escapes
Apart of RvF
There must be an exceptionally high risk of danger, the thing does not need to be dangerous itself, only dangerous when it escapes.
Describe
The thing escapes and causes reasonably foreseeable damage to C property.
Stannard v Gore, Hale v Jennings, Cambridge Water Co
Apart of RvF
Stannard v Gore - The thing must actually escape and cause harm to C’s land. Hale v Jennings - The thing that escapes causes reasonable foreseeable damage. Cambridge Water Co - The D will not be liable if harm is unforeseeable and too remote.
Describe
An Extraordinary and unusual use of land.
Transco, Mason v Levy Autoparts
Apart of RvF
Transco - The use of land must be extra-ordinary and unusual considering the time and place. Mason v Levy Autoparts - The storage of combustible materials in large quantities is unreasonable.
Describe
Defences and Remedies
Perry v Kendrick
Apart of RvF
Volenti
Full defence if C consented to the thing accumulated.
Act of stranger
Perry v Kendrick - Full defence, is stranger D has no control over, has caused things to escape.
Act of God
Full defence, if thing caused by unforeseen and extreme weather conditions.
Act of C
Full defence if C caused thing to escape.
Public Benefit
Defence, if stored for common public benefit or C benefits from the storage.
Remedies
If successful, C gets compensatory damage to cover property damage, not for personal injury.
Apply to an Exam Question
Flip
Apart of RvF
The C is (who has legal interest in land?)
The D is (Who has control or possession of their own land)
1
1) What did D bring onto land?
How did this accumulate there?
2
2)
Why is there an exceptionally high risk of harm, if the thing escapes?
3
3)
The thing escaped because… (why?)
The escape of… causes the harm or damage of (What damage did it do?)
This is (what kind of harm of this?)
The D could/n’t forsee that harm could occur if things escapes because?
4
4) The storage amounts to a natural/non-natural use of the land.
What was the purpose of the land? Why is this a natural or non-natural?
Defence
Volenti - Explain how C consented to escape or damage?
Act of C - How has C contributed to the damage.
Act of Stranger - Who is the stranger? What did they do? Did D have control?
Act of God - Why is this act of god? Was it unforeseen? Extreme weather?
Public benefit - What is the benefit of the accumulation of the thing?
Remedies
What was the damage?
If C is successful, get compensatory damage to cover properly but not personal injury.